Oops, link missing.
On 26-04-2023 22:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
We discussed this during the Release Team IRC meeting [1]
[1]
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-release/2023/debian-release.2023-04-26-18.59.html
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
We discussed this during the Release Team IRC meeting [1], and we
decided that it's too late in the release cycle to fix this. We'll
accept the de-facto baseline bump for bookworm and document the fact in
the Release Notes.
Having said that, without
Followup-For: Bug #973414
X-Debbugs-Cc: fierel...@gmail.com
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 23:07:35 +0200, Fierelier wrote:
> * In terms of confusion: I think using the Rust i586 toolchain, and
> building for i586 with Rust might be less confusing, because altering
> the i686 definitions for rustc will make
* In terms of efficiency: I believe that if people are on the hunt for
efficiency on CPUs at the top-end of x86, they shall use distros that
target Pentium 4 explicitly. There are a few of them out there, now.
Archlinux32 for example carries packages for i486, i686 and Pentium 4
where possible,
Package: rustc
Followup-For: Bug #973414
X-Debbugs-Cc: fierel...@gmail.com
Hi Fierelier - thanks for your previous comment, here's my reply, slightly
later than I'd hoped:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:10:52 +0200, Fierelier wrote:
> - issue 1: i386, i486, i586, i686 are considered as Pentium 4 in
Package: rustc
Followup-For: Bug #973414
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-toolch...@lists.debian.org, martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi,
fierel...@gmail.com
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 patch
A caution: there's a good chance I'm wasting everyone's time with this patch
and much of the preceding
Package: rustc
Followup-For: Bug #973414
X-Debbugs-Cc: fierel...@gmail.com
After a few false starts, I've built libstd-rust-dev:i386 targeting i686 in the
way I'd expected (and to clarify: the interpretation I'm using is to match
Debian's baseline and a strict-ish reading of what P6 / i686 was
@jay - I hope this helps you:
- issue 1: i386, i486, i586, i686 are considered as Pentium 4 in LLVM,
which might be relevant if Rust is compiled with it:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61347
- issue 2: Rust considers i686 as Pentium 4, and i586 as Pentium:
Package: rustc
Followup-For: Bug #973414
> Today I plan to rebuild rustc on Debian i386 with RUSTC_FLAGS (different to
> RUSTFLAGS) configured for i686 during the build. That's inspired by a comment
> here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/31110#issuecomment-174327810
>
> To implement
Package: rustc
Followup-For: Bug #973414
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:23:18 +, James wrote:
> > In particular, one area to look at:
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-14.0.6/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp#L25-L70
>
> Line range correction:
>
>
>
Followup-For: Bug #973414
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:23:18 +, James wrote:
> In particular, one area to look at:
>
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-14.0.6/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/X86.cpp#L25-L70
Line range correction:
Package: rustc
Followup-For: Bug #973414
X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi, fierel...@gmail.com, s...@debian.org,
ru...@packages.debian.org
I've been trying to track down 'NOPL' opcodes in Debian's i386 bookworm archive
and many of the affected cases appear Rust and/or LLVM-related.
The
12 matches
Mail list logo
