Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding

2021-06-03 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Bastian" == Bastian Germann writes: Bastian> There are H.264 patents that are applicable. I do not know Bastian> how the existing H.264 implementations in Debian handle Bastian> this, e.g. x264 or ffmpeg. According to the legal FAQ, Bastian> these seem to be ignored. I

Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding

2021-06-02 Thread Walter Landry
Bastian Germann writes: > Am 02.06.21 um 17:33 schrieb Tobias Frost: >> Is this RFS package now a downloader or the library itself? > > It's both. The -dev package is created from the source files and > resides in main. The library package contains the downloader as a > postinst script, which

Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding

2021-06-02 Thread Bastian Germann
Am 02.06.21 um 17:33 schrieb Tobias Frost: On Fri, 14 May 2021 00:04:52 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: This is fine. The package must not reside in main. If you plan to release the package (the downloader) under a DFSG-compatible license, please submit it to contrib rather than non-free. I am

Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding

2021-06-02 Thread Tobias Frost
On Fri, 14 May 2021 00:04:52 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding > > On Sat, 8 May 2021 18:28:35 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > > This is fine. The package must not reside in main. If you plan to > > release the package (the

Bug#974678: ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding

2021-05-13 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: retitle -1 ITP: openh264 -- H.264 encoding and decoding On Sat, 8 May 2021 18:28:35 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: This is fine. The package must not reside in main. If you plan to release the package (the downloader) under a DFSG-compatible license, please submit it to contrib rather