Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-17 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo


On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:36:50 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote:

[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > [notify-osd](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/notify-osd/filelist)
> > does not seem to.
> 
> Indeed, thanks!
> 
> > On the other hand,
> > [xfce4-notifyd](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/xfce4-notifyd/filelist)
> > seems to ship one.
> 
> That one clearly works. :-)
> 
> > Should I give systray-mdstat/1.2.0-1 another try, after installing
> > xfce4-notifyd?
> 
> Yes, please, at least for the checking other issue which I assume that
> it is solved with the upload.

Let's try:

  $ apt policy xfce4-notifyd
  xfce4-notifyd:
Installed: 0.6.1-1
Candidate: 0.6.1-1
Version table:
   *** 0.6.1-1 800
  800 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ apt policy systray-mdstat
  systray-mdstat:
Installed: 1.2.0-1
Candidate: 1.2.0-1
Version table:
   *** 1.2.0-1 500
  500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.1.0-1 800
  800 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
  $ systray-mdstat &
  [1] 16468
  $

It does not complain and it produces a notification, as shown in the
attached xfce4-notifyd_screenshot.png !

[...]
> Hm, now that I think about. Could this issue be also the reason
> for your initially reported issues in #886419, just that
> Desktop::Notify is less tolerant about this?

  $ apt policy systray-mdstat 
  systray-mdstat:
Installed: 1.1.0-1
Candidate: 1.1.0-1
Version table:
   1.2.0-1 500
  500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
   *** 1.1.0-1 800
  800 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
  $ systray-mdstat &
  [1] 13746
  no notify because setup failed:
  $ killall -TERM systray-mdstat
  [1]   Terminated  systray-mdstat
  $ /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon &
  [2] 13767
  $ systray-mdstat &
  [3] 13782
  no notify because setup failed:
  $ killall -TERM systray-mdstat
  [3]+  Terminated  systray-mdstat
  $ killall -TERM notification-daemon
  [2]+  Terminated  /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon

It complains even when notification-daemon is running...

[...]
> A potential third variant, but much more ugly in implementation, would
> be to rely on passing the messages to /usr/bin/notify-send on the
> commandline or STDIN, i.e. forking for every notification.

I agree that this would _not_ be an elegant solution!

[...]
> Which actually leads me to the suspicion that maybe the cause is that
> notification-daemon is not running on your desktop system for whatever
> reason (like using a classic X Window Manager which doesn't care about
> autostart desktop files — which I consider to be a totally valid
> reason btw. :-)

I use Fluxbox as a standalone window manager: I don't use a
full desktop environment.
I start my X session with startx and a custom ~/.xsession file.

> 
> And since you have none of the other notification daemons installed,
> which could be activated over D-Bus automatically, the reported issue
> sounds like a probable outcome of that scenario.
> 
> 
> 
> Could you check on your system if
> /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon is actually running?
> 
> 

It is not! I get not output from:

  $ ps aux | grep notification-daemo[n]
  $

> 
> If it is not running, we have found the cause (dependency still
> missing, though :-) and I probably should catch that case in
> systray-mdstat.

Let's try the following:

  $ apt policy systray-mdstat
  systray-mdstat:
Installed: 1.2.0-1
Candidate: 1.2.0-1
Version table:
   *** 1.2.0-1 500
  500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.1.0-1 800
  800 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
  $ systray-mdstat &
  [1] 15080
  org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files
  [1]+  Exit 11 systray-mdstat
  $ /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon &
  [1] 15081
  $ systray-mdstat &
  [2] 15085
  $

It does not complain and it produces a notification, as shown in the
attached notification-daemon_screenshot.png !

Should I add:

  /usr/lib/notification-daemon/notification-daemon &

somewhere near the beginning of my ~/.xsession file?
And:

  killall -TERM notification-daemon

somewhere near the end of my ~/.xsession file?

Or should I install xfce4-notifyd and have it autostarted
via DBus?

> 
> I nevertheless think that this then would be a bug in
> notification-daemon as it only starts properly depending on the
> desktop environment.

If there's a way to automatically start 

Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-17 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

Hi Francesco,

(Hint: The reason for the moreinfo tag is near the end of the mail.)

Francesco Poli wrote:
> > So despite it's name "notification-daemon" looking like being the most
> > generic one of all of them, it looks to me as if it does not to
> > provide that interface. Very unexpected.
[...]
> I found [bug #918385](https://bugs.debian.org/918385), which seems to
> request this .service file.

Thanks!

> Sadly, it looks like it's still unaddressed.

No comment.

> > So
> > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Name%3Dorg.freedesktop.Notifications
> > leads to this package list:
> > 
> > ukui-notification-daemon
> > deepin-notifications
> > plasma-workspace
> > mako-notifier
> > xfce4-notifyd
> > mate-notification-daemon
> > notify-osd
> 
> But not all of them actually ship a .service file:

And actually dunst is missing in that list. Maybe it constructs the
.service file I found on my system only during the package build.

JFTR: On my system, it seems to be xfce4-notifyd which is running (a
few other notification daemons are installed via dependencies, too).

So I'm quite sure that it at least works with xfce4-notifyd. IIRC I
used dunst in the past for a while, too. So I assume that one still
works, too.

> [notify-osd](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/notify-osd/filelist)
> does not seem to.

Indeed, thanks!

> On the other hand,
> [xfce4-notifyd](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/xfce4-notifyd/filelist)
> seems to ship one.

That one clearly works. :-)

> Should I give systray-mdstat/1.2.0-1 another try, after installing
> xfce4-notifyd?

Yes, please, at least for the checking other issue which I assume that
it is solved with the upload.

> Or maybe I should try with:
> [ukui-notification-daemon](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/ukui-notification-daemon/filelist)

ukui-notification-daemon und deepin-notifications come from cultural
(IIRC Russian and Chinese) focussed desktop environments, so I'm not
sure what actually makes them different from (an older) GNOME or
MATE notification daemon. But yeah, would be interesting to know if
and only if it works if such a file is present.

Hm, now that I think about. Could this issue be also the reason
for your initially reported issues in #886419, just that
Desktop::Notify is less tolerant about this?

> > So a short-term workaround seems to depend on only an alternative list
> > of these notification daemons.
> 
> Well, please check which of them actually ship the required .service
> file, first...

Good point, yes. Codesearch just searches through the source code and
not every source code in there is used in the actual binary packages.

> > Not sure though if it's really related, because the commit message
> > seems to sound more like they just disabled starting
> > notification-daemon via D-Bus and starred it always by default.
> 
> Mmmh, I do not know for sure, because I am totally ignorant about
> notification daemons,

Well, yeah, similar here. :-)

> but that commit seems to explain that DBus activation causes issues.

Well, it more refers to problems, but doesn't really explain anything.
Which doesn't really help much in understanding what actually caused
them to remove that.

> And it seems to say that a .desktop file may be used instead (?).

Yes. Which does autostart notification-daemon. But even then: How do
they communicate. I though GNOME does nearly everything via D-Bus
nowadays.

> Is there a way for systray-mdstat to use the .desktop interface, rather
> than the .service interface?

Well, it's actually the D-Bus interface. D-Bus just happens to use
.service files like systemd, but it still seems to be something
different.

The Perl module Desktop::Notify which I switched to (because it seemed
to work better than the old implementation in
Glib::Object::Introspection) hasn't seen much love in the past few
years, so I suspect it hasn't been adapted to whatever GNOME's
notification-daemon now uses to communicate with it. At least the
documentation clearly says:

  This module serves the same purpose as "libnotify", in an
  object-oriented Perl interface. It is not, however, an interface to
  "libnotify" itself, but a separate implementation of the
  specification using Net::DBus.

So I strongly assume it only works via D-Bus.

A potential third variant, but much more ugly in implementation, would
be to rely on passing the messages to /usr/bin/notify-send on the
commandline or STDIN, i.e. forking for every notification.

Would have the advantage that it uses a more maintained library, at
least. (I think.)

Then again, libnotify's package descriptions contain the phrase "sends
desktop notifications to a notification daemon, as defined in the
Desktop Notifications spec". That spec seems to be this one:
https://developer.gnome.org/notification-spec/

And this clearly states "all notifications are controlled by a single
session-scoped service which exposes a D-BUS interface." So it's still
a D-Bus thing 

Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-17 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:38:42 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote:

[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Package notification-daemon does not seem to ship any *.service file:
> > 
> >   $ dpkg -L notification-daemon | grep -i service
> 
> But other notification daemons seem to do.
> 
> So despite it's name "notification-daemon" looking like being the most
> generic one of all of them, it looks to me as if it does not to
> provide that interface. Very unexpected.

I see.

I found [bug #918385](https://bugs.debian.org/918385), which seems to
request this .service file.
Sadly, it looks like it's still unaddressed.

> 
> > P.S.: I dropped the moreinfo tag, but, of course, feel free to re-set
> >   it, in case you need any other answer from me!
> 
> Perfectly fine. Need to think about this and investigate further.
> 
> So
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Name%3Dorg.freedesktop.Notifications
> leads to this package list:
> 
> ukui-notification-daemon
> deepin-notifications
> plasma-workspace
> mako-notifier
> xfce4-notifyd
> mate-notification-daemon
> notify-osd

But not all of them actually ship a .service file:
[notify-osd](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/notify-osd/filelist)
does not seem to.

On the other hand,
[xfce4-notifyd](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/xfce4-notifyd/filelist)
seems to ship one.

Should I give systray-mdstat/1.2.0-1 another try, after installing
xfce4-notifyd?

Or maybe I should try with:
[ukui-notification-daemon](https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/ukui-notification-daemon/filelist)

> 
> So a short-term workaround seems to depend on only an alternative list
> of these notification daemons.

Well, please check which of them actually ship the required .service
file, first...

> 
> It's though clearly not all notification-daemons in Debian. At least
> lxqt-notificationd and some window manager/desktop environments seem
> to provide "notification-daemon", but not have such a file, too.
> 
> But since at least ukui-notification-daemon, deepin-notifications and
> mate-notification-daemon are AFAIK based on GNOME's
> notification-daemon, I tried to find something in it's changelog,
> but I only found this in the upstream changelog from 2011 (!):
> 
>   NEW in 0.7.1:
>   ==
>   - Don't use DBus activation
> 
> And this upstream commit:
> 
> commit 1ad20d22098bc7718614a8a87744a2c22d5438d0
> Author: Matthias Clasen 
> Date:   Tue Feb 15 09:52:11 2011 -0500
> 
> Don't use dbus activation
> 
> Dbus activation causes a race with gnome-shell at session startup.
> Instead, install a regular desktop file, so we can make
> notification-daemon a required component of the fallback session.
> Finally, install notification-daemon in bindir to avoid fiddling
> with libexecdir when generating the desktop file.
> 
>  data/Makefile.am  | 8 +---
>  data/notification-daemon.desktop.in   | 7 +++
>  data/org.freedesktop.Notifications.service.in | 3 ---
>  src/Makefile.am   | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Not sure though if it's really related, because the commit message
> seems to sound more like they just disabled starting
> notification-daemon via D-Bus and starred it always by default.

Mmmh, I do not know for sure, because I am totally ignorant about
notification daemons, but that commit seems to explain that DBus
activation causes issues.
And it seems to say that a .desktop file may be used instead (?).

Is there a way for systray-mdstat to use the .desktop interface, rather
than the .service interface?

> 
> But maybe I'm also looking at the wrong place. At least
> "org.freedesktop.Notifications" shows up all over
> notification-daemon's source code:
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=package%3Anotification-daemon+org.freedesktop.Notifications+package%3A%5CQnotification-daemon%5CE=1
> 
> Then again, not having such a service file seems to fit with your
> observations.

Maybe there's another way to access the org.freedesktop.Notifications
interface, without relying on the .service file. I don't know!

I suspect it is worth researching in this direction...

> 
> Since I'm neither well-versed in GNOME stuff nor in D-Bus stuff, I'm
> bit out of (better) ideas at the moment.

I am sure you are way more knowledgeable than me about this subject.
It probably just needs a little more research, and you'll figure
everything out!   :-)


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgp0ibV4YFdcY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-17 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Francesco,

Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > I have notification-daemon installed on my system:
> > 
> > That's strange.
> > 
> > Can you send me the output of this command on the system where this
> > happened?
> > 
> > $ fgrep org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
> 
>   $ fgrep org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
>   $ fgrep -i org.freedesktop.Notifications 
> /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
>   $ fgrep -i Notification /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
>   $
> 
> No output at all.

Ok, that's _not_ what I expected and hence leads us closer.

> Which file did you expect me to find?

Something like this:

$ fgrep org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/com.deepin.dde.freedesktop.Notification.service:Nameorg.freedesktop.Notifications
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.freedesktop.mate.Notifications.service:Name=org.freedesktop.Notifications
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.kde.plasma.Notifications.service:Name=org.freedesktop.Notifications
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.kde.plasma.Notifications.service:Exec=/usr/bin/plasma_waitforname
 org.freedesktop.Notifications
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.knopwob.dunst.service:Name=org.freedesktop.Notifications
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.xfce.xfce4-notifyd.Notifications.service:Name=org.freedesktop.Notifications

> Package notification-daemon does not seem to ship any *.service file:
> 
>   $ dpkg -L notification-daemon | grep -i service

But other notification daemons seem to do.

So despite it's name "notification-daemon" looking like being the most
generic one of all of them, it looks to me as if it does not to
provide that interface. Very unexpected.

> P.S.: I dropped the moreinfo tag, but, of course, feel free to re-set
>   it, in case you need any other answer from me!

Perfectly fine. Need to think about this and investigate further.

So
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Name%3Dorg.freedesktop.Notifications
leads to this package list:

ukui-notification-daemon
deepin-notifications
plasma-workspace
mako-notifier
xfce4-notifyd
mate-notification-daemon
notify-osd

So a short-term workaround seems to depend on only an alternative list
of these notification daemons.

It's though clearly not all notification-daemons in Debian. At least
lxqt-notificationd and some window manager/desktop environments seem
to provide "notification-daemon", but not have such a file, too.

But since at least ukui-notification-daemon, deepin-notifications and
mate-notification-daemon are AFAIK based on GNOME's
notification-daemon, I tried to find something in it's changelog,
but I only found this in the upstream changelog from 2011 (!):

  NEW in 0.7.1:
  ==
  - Don't use DBus activation

And this upstream commit:

commit 1ad20d22098bc7718614a8a87744a2c22d5438d0
Author: Matthias Clasen 
Date:   Tue Feb 15 09:52:11 2011 -0500

Don't use dbus activation

Dbus activation causes a race with gnome-shell at session startup.
Instead, install a regular desktop file, so we can make
notification-daemon a required component of the fallback session.
Finally, install notification-daemon in bindir to avoid fiddling
with libexecdir when generating the desktop file.

 data/Makefile.am  | 8 +---
 data/notification-daemon.desktop.in   | 7 +++
 data/org.freedesktop.Notifications.service.in | 3 ---
 src/Makefile.am   | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Not sure though if it's really related, because the commit message
seems to sound more like they just disabled starting
notification-daemon via D-Bus and starred it always by default.

But maybe I'm also looking at the wrong place. At least
"org.freedesktop.Notifications" shows up all over
notification-daemon's source code:
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=package%3Anotification-daemon+org.freedesktop.Notifications+package%3A%5CQnotification-daemon%5CE=1

Then again, not having such a service file seems to fit with your
observations.

Since I'm neither well-versed in GNOME stuff nor in D-Bus stuff, I'm
bit out of (better) ideas at the moment.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-17 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo


On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:58:17 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote:

[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I have notification-daemon installed on my system:
> 
> That's strange.
> 
> Can you send me the output of this command on the system where this
> happened?
> 
> $ fgrep org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service

  $ fgrep org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
  $ fgrep -i org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
  $ fgrep -i Notification /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service
  $

No output at all.

Which file did you expect me to find?
Package notification-daemon does not seem to ship any *.service file:

  $ dpkg -L notification-daemon | grep -i service
  $

> 
> TIA!

Thanks to you!

P.S.: I dropped the moreinfo tag, but, of course, feel free to re-set
  it, in case you need any other answer from me!


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgpeDg4VhBAg_.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-17 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo

Hi Francesco,

Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > >   $ org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
> > > > org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files
> > 
> > Seems to be a missing dependency on notification-daemon.
> 
> I have notification-daemon installed on my system:

That's strange.

Can you send me the output of this command on the system where this
happened?

$ fgrep org.freedesktop.Notifications /usr/share/dbus-1/services/*.service

TIA!

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-16 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:30:19 +0100 Axel Beckert wrote:

> Hi Francesco,

Hi Axel!
Thanks for your prompt reply.

> 
> Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> > >   $ systray-mdstat &
> > >   [1] 64881
> > >   $ org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
> > > org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files
> 
> Seems to be a missing dependency on notification-daemon.

I have notification-daemon installed on my system:

  $ apt policy notification-daemon
  notification-daemon:
Installed: 3.20.0-4
Candidate: 3.20.0-4
Version table:
   *** 3.20.0-4 800
  800 http://deb.debian.org/debian testing/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Hence, I would say that adding a dependency on notification-daemon
won't change anything...

> 
> I though wonder how the 1.1.0 version then worked without. :-)

notification-daemon was already installed.



-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgp7GgpjvCHAX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-16 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Francesco,

Axel Beckert wrote:
> Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> >   $ systray-mdstat &
> >   [1] 64881
> >   $ org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
> > org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files

Seems to be a missing dependency on notification-daemon.

I though wonder how the 1.1.0 version then worked without. :-)

Anyway, will fix it, but maybe no more this night.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-16 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Francesco,

Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
>   $ systray-mdstat &
>   [1] 64881
>   $ org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
> org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files
>   
>   [1]+  Exit 11 systray-mdstat
> 
> This seems to render the package unusable.

Thanks for the bug report! This looks like there's still a dependency
missing for the new backend. Probably something related to D-Bus.

> Please investigate and fix the bug.

For sure! :-)

Thanks again!

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#974949: systray-mdstat: fails to start with org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown

2020-11-16 Thread Francesco Poli (wintermute)
Package: systray-mdstat
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hello,
I've just given the new version from unstable a try.

It seems to completely fail to start:

  $ systray-mdstat &
  [1] 64881
  $ org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name 
org.freedesktop.Notifications was not provided by any .service files
  
  [1]+  Exit 11 systray-mdstat

This seems to render the package unusable.
I am setting grave severity accordingly: this should prevent migration
to testing, until the bug is fixed.

Please investigate and fix the bug.
Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages systray-mdstat depends on:
ii  libdesktop-notify-perl  0.05-2
ii  libfile-sharedir-perl   1.118-1
ii  libgtk3-perl0.037-1
ii  libtry-tiny-perl0.30-1
ii  perl5.30.3-4

systray-mdstat recommends no packages.

Versions of packages systray-mdstat suggests:
ii  fbpanel 7.0-4+b1
pn  smart-notifier  

-- no debconf information