Bug#976801: Bug#982871: lintian-brush: Should not set "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" if debian/tests/control is present
Hi Felix, On 2021-02-16 12:29, Felix Lechner wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Andrius Merkys wrote: >> >> I filed that as a bug in lintian, #976801. > > Your bug was resolved for both teams in Git on the day you filed. It > was not marked pending, however, because I accidentally appended a > digit to the bug number in the commit message. (I had just started to > use a keyboard layout [1] that reverses the Shift function on digits > for easier access to the symbols; the closing parenthesis became a > zero.) Here is the corresponding commit: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/920143ae57ed8b7607ac3160ba8f7ef766b3407a Thank you for letting me know! > Please note that, in any event, the fix came too late for 'bullseye'. > In consideration of public opinion, we are not presently updating > Lintian in the archive. [2] Thank you! Sure, no problem. > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/lechner/rocket-layout > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/01/msg00236.html Best wishes, Andrius
Bug#976801: Bug#982871: lintian-brush: Should not set "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" if debian/tests/control is present
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 08:41:05AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hello, > > On 2021-02-15 22:12, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:29:51 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > >> Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > So please stop adding "Testsuite:" headers if debian/tests/control is > already present. > > Luckily the testsuite declared in debian/tests/control was still run, so > it didn't completely break autopkgtest for this package, but at least > caused unnecessary tests being tried to run, but then skipped. > >>> Thanks for the bug report. > >>> > >>> It looks like this is also a bug in lintian, since it reports > >>> team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests for equivs: > >>> > >>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests.html > >> > >> Hmmm, I have recently worked on debsums (similar case of a native > >> pkg-perl-team package which also has a debian/tests/control file) and > >> I can't remember having seen that warning. Then again I had the > >> feeling that the lintian tags on the web are often outdated. > >> > >> Just checked: Yeah, it's overridden there. (Overridden by myself in > >> 2015. :-) > > > > Heh :) > > > > I think that's a know, hm, behaviour lintian. I thought there even > > was a bug report about it but I can't find it right now. > > I had similar (same?) experience with lintian's > team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests due to the package having both > "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" and debian/tests/control. I filed that > as bug in lintian, #976801. This seems to be a slightly different issue. Should autopkgtest-pkg-perl still be added to Testsuite if there are other testsuites present, i.e. should this lintian issue still be raised as the team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests description suggests if "autopkgtest-pkg-perl" is not present but some other Testsuite setting is? Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#976801: Bug#982871: lintian-brush: Should not set "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" if debian/tests/control is present
Control: tags -1 +pending Hi Andrius On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Andrius Merkys wrote: > > I filed that as a bug in lintian, #976801. Your bug was resolved for both teams in Git on the day you filed. It was not marked pending, however, because I accidentally appended a digit to the bug number in the commit message. (I had just started to use a keyboard layout [1] that reverses the Shift function on digits for easier access to the symbols; the closing parenthesis became a zero.) Here is the corresponding commit: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/920143ae57ed8b7607ac3160ba8f7ef766b3407a Please note that, in any event, the fix came too late for 'bullseye'. In consideration of public opinion, we are not presently updating Lintian in the archive. [2] Thank you! Kind regards Felix Lechner [1] https://salsa.debian.org/lechner/rocket-layout [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/01/msg00236.html
Bug#976801: Bug#982871: lintian-brush: Should not set "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" if debian/tests/control is present
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:41:05 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > > I think that's a know, hm, behaviour lintian. I thought there even > > was a bug report about it but I can't find it right now. > I had similar (same?) experience with lintian's > team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests due to the package having both > "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" and debian/tests/control. I filed that > as bug in lintian, #976801. Ha, that was the bug I vaguely remembered yesterday but couldn't find! Thanks. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #321: Scheduled global CPU outage
Bug#976801: Bug#982871: lintian-brush: Should not set "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" if debian/tests/control is present
Hello, On 2021-02-15 22:12, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:29:51 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: >> Jelmer Vernooij wrote: So please stop adding "Testsuite:" headers if debian/tests/control is already present. Luckily the testsuite declared in debian/tests/control was still run, so it didn't completely break autopkgtest for this package, but at least caused unnecessary tests being tried to run, but then skipped. >>> Thanks for the bug report. >>> >>> It looks like this is also a bug in lintian, since it reports >>> team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests for equivs: >>> >>> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests.html >> >> Hmmm, I have recently worked on debsums (similar case of a native >> pkg-perl-team package which also has a debian/tests/control file) and >> I can't remember having seen that warning. Then again I had the >> feeling that the lintian tags on the web are often outdated. >> >> Just checked: Yeah, it's overridden there. (Overridden by myself in >> 2015. :-) > > Heh :) > > I think that's a know, hm, behaviour lintian. I thought there even > was a bug report about it but I can't find it right now. I had similar (same?) experience with lintian's team/pkg-perl/testsuite/no-team-tests due to the package having both "Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-perl" and debian/tests/control. I filed that as bug in lintian, #976801. Best, Andrius
