Bug#978564: src:gst-plugins-bad1.0: fails to migrate to testing for too long: dependency is not migrating

2021-01-08 Thread Paul Gevers
HI Sebastian, On Thu, 07 Jan 2021 12:56:42 +0200 Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dr=F6ge?= wrote: > That seems like something for the maintainer to figure out IMHO but > they didn't even respond to #971754 yet. They orphaned the package today after I inquired on the progress. > There's going to be

Bug#978564: src:gst-plugins-bad1.0: fails to migrate to testing for too long: dependency is not migrating

2021-01-07 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 19:09:04 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > > This is solely blocked on srt currently, and the maintainer will have > > to figure out a solution there for the ABI breakage. > > Ack. Although, you *could* help them find a solution. RC bugs in key > packages are a shared

Bug#978564: src:gst-plugins-bad1.0: fails to migrate to testing for too long: dependency is not migrating

2021-01-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sebastian, On 05-01-2021 10:46, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:40:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: >> >> If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to >> issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. >> In this case, I think it may be

Bug#978564: src:gst-plugins-bad1.0: fails to migrate to testing for too long: dependency is not migrating

2021-01-05 Thread Sebastian Dröge
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 18:40:38 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to > issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team. > In this case, I think it may be wise to upload to > testing-proposed-updates and ask for an

Bug#978564: src:gst-plugins-bad1.0: fails to migrate to testing for too long: dependency is not migrating

2020-12-28 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: gst-plugins-bad1.0 Version: 1.18.0-2 Severity: serious Control: close -1 1.18.2-1 Tags: sid bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 976288 Dear maintainer(s), As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that