I can't help but feel this needs to be rethought.
If I install the current Debian 12 via netinst and choose not to install
'standard system utilities'... a choice many people take if they prefer
to install their own set of utilities instead... and a choice which
doesn't
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukas Pirl
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 13:51
> To: Limonciello, Mario
> Cc: 980...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#980049: fwupd: Should fwupd specify dbus as a dependency?
>
> Thanks for your quick reply, Mario.
>
Thanks for your quick reply, Mario.
On Wed, 2021-01-13 16:10 +, Limonciello, Mario wrote as excerpted:
> I don't think it's a true dependency. You can use fwupdtool without it.
> It's only needed for fwupdmgr.
> Perhaps a Recommends would be better?
I didn't know if fwupd is really useful
age-
> From: lukas
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 6:55
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Subject: Bug#980049: fwupd: Should fwupd specify dbus as a dependency?
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Package: fwupd
> Version: 1.5.3-2
> Severity: importan
Package: fwupd
Version: 1.5.3-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainers,
thanks for maintaining this package and taking the time to consider this bug
report.
On a minimal system, it happened to me that when installing fwupd, dbus is
has not been installed as a dependency.
Without dbus, fwupd
5 matches
Mail list logo
