Bug#980671: bmtk: FTBFS: Signal: Aborted (6)

2021-02-05 Thread Shayan Doust
Hello, I've finally had the chance to look at this, and I have also not been able to reproduce this issue using sbuild. Kind regards, Shayan Doust On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:29:25 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:49:20PM +0100, Étienne

Bug#980671: bmtk: FTBFS: Signal: Aborted (6)

2021-01-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: severity -1 important On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:49:20PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > Control: tag -1 unreproducible > ... > Anyone else is able to reproduce the problem ? The package builds nicely in my pbuilder chroot as well. So I'm setting severity

Bug#980671: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#980671: bmtk: FTBFS: Signal: Aborted (6)

2021-01-21 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: tag -1 unreproducible Hi there, Lucas Nussbaum, on 2021-01-20 21:53:58 +0100: > Relevant part (hopefully): > > reading sources... [ 87%] tutorial_NetworkBuilder_Intro > > A process has executed an operation involving a call > > to the fork() system call to

Bug#980671: bmtk: FTBFS: Signal: Aborted (6)

2021-01-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: bmtk Version: 0.0+git20201018.018da0a+ds-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering