On Saturday, January 22, 2022 12:15:25 P.M. CST Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Tille, on 2022-01-16:
> > I think the roadmap that ITK4 will be deleted as soon as possible
> > is clear. However, if it might serve as an intermediate means
> > to support some remaining
Thanks a lot!
Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 07:15:25PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Tille, on 2022-01-16:
> > I think the roadmap that ITK4 will be deleted as soon as possible
> > is clear. However, if it might serve as an intermediate means
> > to support some remaining
Am Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:51:43AM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> At some point I tried investigating how to reproduce the tiff
> test failure with minimum requirements, to determine whether the
> problem comes from the way itk4 calls the library, or if the
> library itself is at fault, but I
Am Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 07:07:01AM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
> On 1/15/22 21:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > There is no RM bug for insighttoolkit4 yet,
> >
> > Steve simply bumped the version right in d/changelog[1]
>
> How does the insighttoolkit5 package in unstable cause the
On 1/15/22 21:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Bas,
Am Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 08:30:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
Insighttoolkit4 will be removed from Debian. We are now building
insighttoolkit5 and do not support insighttoolkit4 any more.
Good to know.
OTB won't support ITK5 for
Hi Bas,
Am Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 08:30:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
> > Insighttoolkit4 will be removed from Debian. We are now building
> > insighttoolkit5 and do not support insighttoolkit4 any more.
>
> Good to know.
>
> OTB won't support ITK5 for quite a while, though:
>
>
On 1/15/22 20:11, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 06:45:11PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:58:42 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote:
This bug has been fixed in the meantime.
insighttoolkit4 still FTBFS with GCC 11:
error: ISO C++17 does not allow dynamic
Am Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 06:45:11PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
> reopen -1
>
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:58:42 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > This bug has been fixed in the meantime.
>
> insighttoolkit4 still FTBFS with GCC 11:
>
> error: ISO C++17 does not allow dynamic exception
reopen -1
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:58:42 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:25:59PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 04:02:09PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > About the build error I caught with itk4 on , this
> > looks to be caused by a gcc bug in the
Am Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 05:25:59PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 04:02:09PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > About the build error I caught with itk4 on , this
> > looks to be caused by a gcc bug in the headers files [1],
> > causing failures to build
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 04:02:09PM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> About the build error I caught with itk4 on , this
> looks to be caused by a gcc bug in the headers files [1],
> causing failures to build source code including with
> clang, compiler which is in use through
On Saturday, December 11, 2021 3:02:02 A.M. CST Étienne Mollier wrote:
> I considered pushing a change yesterday to disable those tests
> on insighttoolkit4,
Let's please agree to NEVER do that.
> not to hide dust under the carpet, but to
> give a chance to reverse dependencies to make it to
12 matches
Mail list logo
