Le 2021-05-19 20:58, Paul Gevers a écrit :
unblocked.
Thank you very much Paul!
On 15/05/2021 07:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Are commits f8bc235 and 10263b1 the head of the OpenJDK archive?
Yes, but these commits refer to the AdoptOpenJDK Git mirror [1] of the
upstream Mercurial repository [2]. src:openjdk-11 pulls directly from
Mercurial but the source tree is identical.
>
Hi Emmanuel,
On 15-05-2021 00:58, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've compared DCEVM 11.0.10 [1] and 11.0.11 [2],
Are commits f8bc235 and 10263b1 the head of the OpenJDK archive? Does
OpenJDK in Debian carry any patches you want to have too?
I start to realize that src:openjdk-11 is probably more than
Hi Paul,
On 14/05/2021 21:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I missed so far that apparently DCEVM is a patch set to the same OpenJDK
> we already have in the archive. Is it feasible, i.e. does it make sense
> and would it help us review it, if you generate a diff of patches,
> instead of the source diff
Hi Emmanuel,
On 01-05-2021 14:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I agree the diff is not reviewable, but it can be seen as an update of
> the DCEVM code to the same state as the OpenJDK code that was already
> accepted in testing. The extra DCEVM patches were simply rebased with no
> changes on top of
Le 03/05/2021 à 10:15, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
>> If your package is so tightly tied to the version of openjdk I would
>> expect mechanisms to be in place to warn you of the upload and to prevent
>> migration of openjdk-11 in case of breakage. E.g. autopkgtest is very
>> well suited to prevent
Hi Paul,
Le 02/05/2021 à 21:38, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> But OpenJDK 11.0.11 was uploaded two months ago, when we were still in
> the soft freeze. Why didn't you fix openjdk-11-jre-dcevm then?
OpenJDK 11.0.11+3 was uploaded in February, but this wasn't a GA
release, OpenJDK 11.0.11 was only
Hi Emmanuel
On 01-05-2021 14:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Every time OpenJDK is
> updated in Debian, the corresponding DCEVM package has to be updated as
> well, otherwise it's likely to fail or crash. That's exactly what
> happens currently in testing, we have OpenJDK 11.0.11 with DCEVM
>
Le 30/04/2021 à 21:39, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> Please unblock package openjdk-11-jre-dcevm
>
> 333 files changed, 8389 insertions(+), 2196 deletions(-)
> That's not reviewable.
>
>> openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.10+1-1 in testing is currently unusable, it
>> throws an error because the version
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Emmanuel,
On 27-04-2021 13:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Please unblock package openjdk-11-jre-dcevm
333 files changed, 8389 insertions(+), 2196 deletions(-)
That's not reviewable.
> openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.10+1-1 in testing is currently unusable, it
> throws an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package openjdk-11-jre-dcevm
openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.10+1-1 in testing is currently unusable, it
throws an error because the version isn't aligned with the openjdk-11
11 matches
Mail list logo
