Hi Simon,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 17:27:48 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
If you really think another upload is too much hassle, you could
convince us to unblock regardless if you build twice and show with
diffoscope that the compat bump doesn't impact the (binary) packages at all.
I'm not the
On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 17:27:48 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> If you really think another upload is too much hassle, you could
> convince us to unblock regardless if you build twice and show with
> diffoscope that the compat bump doesn't impact the (binary) packages at all.
I'm not the maintainer,
Hi Ralf,
On 03-06-2021 13:00, Ralf Jung wrote:
>> Changing compat levels is no longer acceptable for bullseye. Please
>> revert.
>
> Ah, that's a bummer. I was not aware of this policy, sorry for that.
> Doing a revert upload sounds like a lot of hassle though that this
> package is probably not
Dear release team,
osspd maintainer here. Version 1.3.2-12 has hit unstable now that my new key is
finally in the keyring.
> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index c412732..9481d07 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
> +osspd
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2021-05-01 11:03:07 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi release team!
>
> I'm writing on behalf of the maintainer of the osspd package (I intend
> to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi release team!
I'm writing on behalf of the maintainer of the osspd package (I intend
to sponsor the potential upload).
We'd like to upload the osspd package to fix #986662 (see [1] for
6 matches
Mail list logo
