Bug#988329: ITA: usbredir/0.9.0-1 -- Simple USB host TCP server
Hi Tobi, > > I retargeted the package to unstable since Debian released recently. I > noticed there was a new version of usbredir released last week. Should I > reupload the package with that version? > I uploaded version 11 so it's up to date now. I'm very excited to have it uploaded! I'm planning on attending the conference next week, maybe I'll see you on IRC :) Lin Qigang GPG Fingerprint: 8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223 03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, August 18th, 2021 at 8:47 PM, Lin Qigang wrote: > Hi Tobi, > > > (- as said in the mail before, dont close the RFS bug in the changelog) > > > > - you could add yourself to the debian/* section in d/copyright, > > - d/control > > - has still the old S-V of 4.2.1... > > > > - the long description for usbredirserver, the deprecation notice > > should > > > > possibly have its own paragraph? > > > > - is the B-D on cmake necessary? (as the package uses meson) > > > > I made the changes, it should be good now > > > As othewise the package looks good, so lets finish the polishing > > and then do the upload! > > > > I retargeted the package to unstable since Debian released recently. I > noticed there was a new version of usbredir released last week. Should I > reupload the package with that version? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#988329: ITA: usbredir/0.9.0-1 -- Simple USB host TCP server
Hi Tobi, > (- as said in the mail before, dont close the RFS bug in the changelog) > > - you could add yourself to the debian/* section in d/copyright, > - d/control > - has still the old S-V of 4.2.1... > - the long description for usbredirserver, the deprecation notice should > > possibly have its own paragraph? > - is the B-D on cmake necessary? (as the package uses meson) I made the changes, it should be good now > As othewise the package looks good, so lets finish the polishing and > then do the upload! I retargeted the package to unstable since Debian released recently. I noticed there was a new version of usbredir released last week. Should I reupload the package with that version? Lin Qigang GPG Fingerprint: 8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223 03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#988329: ITA: usbredir/0.9.0-1 -- Simple USB host TCP server
Hi Lin, (- as said in the mail before, dont close the RFS bug in the changelog) - you could add yourself to the debian/* section in d/copyright, - d/control - has still the old S-V of 4.2.1... - the long description for usbredirserver, the deprecation notice should possibly have its own paragraph? - is the B-D on cmake necessary? (as the package uses meson) As othewise the package looks good, so lets finish the polishing and then do the upload! -- Cheers, tobi
Bug#988329: ITA: usbredir/0.9.0-1 -- Simple USB host TCP server
(Sorry, I've missed your mail.) On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 04:38:26PM +, Lin Qigang wrote: > retitle 911431 "ITA: usbredir/0.10.0 -- Simple USB host TCP server" > tags 988329 - moreinfo > thanks > > Hi Tobi and everyone else, > > I added #911431 and #988329 to the changelog. I hope retitling this bug > solves the "package closes bug in a wrong way" lintian error. Otherwise could > you please help me fix this? RFSs bugs are not closed using the debian changelog, so remove that one from the changelog. (I try to take a look later today on the package itself) -- tobi
Bug#911431: Bug#988329: ITA: usbredir/0.9.0-1 -- Simple USB host TCP server
retitle 911431 "ITA: usbredir/0.10.0 -- Simple USB host TCP server" tags 988329 - moreinfo thanks Hi Tobi and everyone else, > Please update the package, remove the moreinfo tag and ping me for an > follow up, and I will take a look again. Thanks again for your feedback. I think I fixed all the issues you previously told me about, and am ready for follow up. Here is the package https://mentors.debian.net/package/usbredir/. > Debian is currently frozen I have targeted experimental instead > Regarding the adoption, you should reply to the orphaning bug (#911431), > indicating there that you want to adopt the package by retitling ^this^ bug to > start with "ITA:" (stands for Intent to Adopt) and set yourself as maintainer. > the #911431 with the changelog (the developers reference should have a > paragraph I added #911431 and #988329 to the changelog. I hope retitling this bug solves the "package closes bug in a wrong way" lintian error. Otherwise could you please help me fix this? > Otherwise, the mentors package page lists a few lintian messages, which should > be fixed as well, like those: > - upstream has released 0.10.0 in the meantime. > - compat level is at the ancient level "9". Please consider updating it… > - Standards Version is also quite old. Please consider updating that as well. > (see the upgrade checklist appendix of the Debian Policy) I have fixed all of these lintian messages except for the one that I mentioned. I have updated from 0.8 to 0.10.0, fixed the compat level, updated the standards version, and fixed the remaining items. Thanks again! Lin Qigang GPG Fingerprint: 8CAD 1250 8EE0 3A41 7223 03EC 7096 F91E D75D 028F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
