Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-16 Thread François Mazen
Hello Anton, > When the package is successfully built on all relevant platforms, > you can ask the release team to unblock it. But it will unlikely > happen > due to release policy. I've requested the unblock, see [1]. Let me know if I've missed something. Thanks again for the sponsoring! Have

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-16 Thread François Mazen
Hi Nilesh, thanks for the pointer to the freeze policy. I understand that it's too late and I'm closing the unblock request. Best Regards, François Le lundi 17 mai 2021 à 00:30 +0530, Nilesh Patra a écrit : > Hi, > > On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 00:10, François Mazen wrote: > > Hello Anton, > >

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-16 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, On Mon, 17 May 2021 at 00:10, François Mazen wrote: > Hello Anton, > > > When the package is successfully built on all relevant platforms, > > you can ask the release team to unblock it. But it will unlikely > > happen > > due to release policy. > > I've requested the unblock, see [1]. Let

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread Anton Gladky
You are right. piparts was trying to install the current version in unstable to test the migration. But it failed, because version in unstalbe is uninstallable. I have uploaded the package, but pay attention, i have changed the version number to freefem++_3.61.1+dfsg1-6. When the package is

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread François Mazen
Hello Anton, thanks for your time testing my upload! Apparently, piuparts tries to install the package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1 instead of 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2, why? In the old package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1, the control file contains libmumps-seq-5.3.1 as libfreefem++ dependency which does not exist anymore in

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread Anton Gladky
Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts identified some problems with the installation of libfreefem++-dev [1]. Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not? [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984 Thanks Anton Am Do., 13. Mai

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

2021-05-13 Thread Anton Gladky
Control: tags -1 +pending Hi François, thanks for fixing this issue. I am testing it and if it works, I will upload it. I am not sure, whether it will be possible to reintroduce this package in testing on this stage of the freeze. Please contact the release team about that. Welcome to join

Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite

2021-05-13 Thread François Mazen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freefem++": * Package name: freefem++ Version : 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://www.freefem.org/ff++/