Hi Andreas
> BTW, I did some
>
>apt-key del 578A0494D1C646D1
>
> added my key to /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/fam-tille.gpg and added an
> according
>
>[signed-by=/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/fam-tille.gpg]
>
> option to the sources.list line ... and it does not yet work. So I
> think it is
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:27:31PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > I disagree, and think this bug is a minor documentation issue,
> > > your issue here is likely outside the computer.
> >
> > I stick to the opinion that apt-secure pointing to apt-key which
> > is deprecated is simply the
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:18:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:02:43PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 minor
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:51:22PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I have some packages for my own use (I
Hi Julian,
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 02:02:43PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Control: severity -1 minor
>
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:51:22PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I have some packages for my own use (I mean there is no reason to expect
> > that someone wants to pull things from
Control: severity -1 minor
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 01:51:22PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a (quite) up to date testing and recently I stumbled upon
>
> $ sudo apt update
> ...
> Err:8 http://fam-tille.de/debian local InRelease
> The following signatures couldn't be
Hi,
I'm running a (quite) up to date testing and recently I stumbled upon
$ sudo apt update
...
Err:8 http://fam-tille.de/debian local InRelease
The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 578A0494D1C646D1
...
W: GPG error:
6 matches
Mail list logo
