Bug#991036: Bug#993849: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2022-02-09 Thread Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
Le mercredi 09 février 2022 à 09:32 +0100, Guido Günther a écrit : > Hi, Hello Adrian, Guido, > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:27:50AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Control: severity -1 serious > > > > libhandy is about to be removed from bookworm due to this, > > gnome-authenticator and

Bug#991036: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2022-02-09 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:27:50AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > libhandy is about to be removed from bookworm due to this, > gnome-authenticator and gnome-metronome need to be updated. Just to confirm: I think removal is fine, this API version is unmaintained

Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2022-02-08 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: severity -1 serious libhandy is about to be removed from bookworm due to this, gnome-authenticator and gnome-metronome need to be updated. cu Adrian

Bug#991036: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2021-09-07 Thread Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
Le mardi 07 septembre 2021 à 10:07 +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit : > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 13:36:17 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > A more recent version is already available in src:libhandy-1. > > > > Both versions will be in bullseye, but still shipping both in > > bookworm would feel wrong. >

Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2021-09-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 10:07:10AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 13:36:17 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > A more recent version is already available in src:libhandy-1. > > > > Both versions will be in bullseye, but still shipping both in > > bookworm would feel wrong. > > I

Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2021-09-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 at 13:36:17 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > A more recent version is already available in src:libhandy-1. > > Both versions will be in bullseye, but still shipping both in > bookworm would feel wrong. I think you're right, but I think it might also be too soon for this to be

Bug#991036: [Debian-on-mobile-maintainers] Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2021-07-13 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 01:36:17PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: libhandy > Version: 0.0.13-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: bookworm sid > > A more recent version is already available in src:libhandy-1. > > Both versions will be in bullseye, but still shipping both in > bookworm would

Bug#991036: libhandy: Should this package be removed in bookworm?

2021-07-13 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: libhandy Version: 0.0.13-3 Severity: serious Tags: bookworm sid A more recent version is already available in src:libhandy-1. Both versions will be in bullseye, but still shipping both in bookworm would feel wrong. Please reply in case I am wrong here.