Am 23.08.21 um 22:29 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
We are talking about this 2-line change in update-rc.d:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/init-system-helpers/-/commit/552e993488a403bf88aa342f73bf0b22ce62ff16
We are talking about this 2-line change in update-rc.d:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/init-system-helpers/-/commit/552e993488a403bf88aa342f73bf0b22ce62ff16
I think it's feasible to add that in buster in the next point release, and
with it allow debhelper to safely move the .service files also
Michael Biebl:
> Hi Niels
>
> Am 23.08.21 um 08:19 schrieb Niels Thykier:
>> [...]
>
> systemd in buster (v241) does support reading unit files from
> /usr/lib/systemd/system (see systemd-analyze unit-paths).
> The changes to init-system-helpers (namely update-rc.d) to also consider
> unit files
Hi Niels
Am 23.08.21 um 08:19 schrieb Niels Thykier:
Hi systemd maintainers,
I have been asked to backport debhelper to bullseye-backports.
Before I do that, I would like to confirm whether this is sake to
backport for people upgrading from oldstable (+backports) to buster
(+backports)[1].
Hi systemd maintainers,
I have been asked to backport debhelper to bullseye-backports.
Before I do that, I would like to confirm whether this is sake to
backport for people upgrading from oldstable (+backports) to buster
(+backports)[1].
As I understand it, support for "usr/lib/systemd/system"
Hi,
This change to debhelper's doc-base installation paths [1] also
requires a debhelper backport to bullseye in order to re-calibrate
Lintian's test suite automatically. Thanks!
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
[1]
Package: debhelper
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 992465 by -1
Hi,
Will you please provide a backport of a recent debhelper version to bullseye?
I use Debian stable (now bullseye) when working on Lintian and cannot
test several important changes to existing checks without the new
debhelper
7 matches
Mail list logo
