On 20210916@20:39, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Michele,
>
> On 16-09-2021 19:58, Michele Martone wrote:
> > You are (well, your CI is) building librsb with support for a limited
> > threads
> > count, but invoking it on a machine with lots of cores, without specifying
> > the limited threads count.
Hi Michele,
On 16-09-2021 19:58, Michele Martone wrote:
> You are (well, your CI is) building librsb with support for a limited threads
> count, but invoking it on a machine with lots of cores, without specifying
> the limited threads count.
I don't understand what you're saying here. Is the
On 20210916@13:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Michele,
>
> On 16-09-2021 12:26, Michele Martone wrote:
> > I suggest to set OMP_NUM_THREADS to something small before tests -- say,
> > min(nproc,4) -- for all purposes of testing librsb and octave-sparsersb.
> > For architectural reasons, using all
Hi Michele,
On 16-09-2021 12:26, Michele Martone wrote:
> I suggest to set OMP_NUM_THREADS to something small before tests -- say,
> min(nproc,4) -- for all purposes of testing librsb and octave-sparsersb.
> For architectural reasons, using all the cores (e.g.160) is nonsense here.
> Is that
On 20210916@11:53, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16-09-2021 09:20, Michele Martone wrote:
> >> root@autopkgtest-lxc-bexxro:/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.ghhdpc6_/downtmp/build.J9f/src#
> >> rsbench -CERROR 0xfc00 : The requested feature (e.g.:blocking) is
> >> not available because it was opted out
Hi,
On 16-09-2021 09:20, Michele Martone wrote:
>> root@autopkgtest-lxc-bexxro:/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.ghhdpc6_/downtmp/build.J9f/src#
>> rsbench -CERROR 0xfc00 : The requested feature (e.g.:blocking) is
>> not available because it was opted out or not configured at built time.
> You have up to
On 20210916@08:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Michele,
>
> On 16-09-2021 02:40, Michele Martone wrote:
> > Dear Paul,
> >
> > The problem seems librsb-sided.
> >
> > Assuming librsb fails at detecting cache memory size, maybe can you
> > first export e.g.
> >
Hi Michele,
On 16-09-2021 02:40, Michele Martone wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
> The problem seems librsb-sided.
>
> Assuming librsb fails at detecting cache memory size, maybe can you
> first export e.g.
> RSB_USER_SET_MEM_HIERARCHY_INFO="L2:4/64/512K,L1:8/64/32K"
> and see if this avoids that?
>
On 20210915@22:12, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: octave-sparsersb
> Version: 1.0.8-3
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Tags: sid bookworm
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: flaky timesout
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> I looked at the results of the
Source: octave-sparsersb
Version: 1.0.8-3
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky timesout
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on armhf
because with a recent upload of
10 matches
Mail list logo
