Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-26 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
So, I think I "found" the problem, will need to verify. But I wanted to drop a few lines as reply here: On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 07:30:25AM -0700, ian_br...@mail.ru wrote: > Does that not suggest that the problem is some peculiarity of the build > environment, rather than any specific problem

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-23 Thread ian_bruce
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:03:07 +0200 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > concerning the ftbfs of 1.1. I know of it of course. Just that I've > been busy over the past month. I'm as weirded out by that test failure > as you, especially since I couldn't reproduce it anywhere else. Does that not suggest that

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-22 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:31:36PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > On 2021-09-21 20:03, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Then, concerning the ftbfs of 1.1.  I know of it of course.  Just that > > I've been busy over the past month.  I'm as weirded out by that test > > failure as you, especially since I

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-22 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2021-09-21 20:03, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Then, concerning the ftbfs of 1.1.  I know of it of course.  Just that > I've been busy over the past month.  I'm as weirded out by that test > failure as you, especially since I couldn't reproduce it anywhere else. > But no, I'm not going to ignore a

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-21 Thread ian_bruce
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:57:41 +0300 Andrius Merkys wrote: > I cannot reproduce the failure myself on amd64. I tried building on a > machine without a display, and yet the test succeeds. I will try a > porterbox next. If the test succeeds, is the overall build then successful? Is that the cause

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-21 Thread ian_bruce
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:33:07 +0300 Andrius Merkys wrote: > if(${CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P} EQUAL 8) > set(RENDERING_TESTS_64bit > # .otf font with compressed SVG glyphs > # (test not stable on 32bit Windows) > text-gzipped-svg-glyph > ) > endif() > > Thus this

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-21 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Come on, inkscape 1.0 is not _that_ buggy. It has been around for a whole year (with a few fixing releases in-between), and it's the version present in Debian 11. If it really has grave bugs (I really mean grave), then those should be filed separately, and I should work on getting them fixed as

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-21 Thread Andrius Merkys
On 2021-09-21 18:03, ian_br...@mail.ru wrote: It appears that my assumption that this regression test failure was the cause of the overall build failure on amd64, was incorrect. According to the build logs, this test also fails on ppc64 and sparc64, and yet the builds for those architectures

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-21 Thread ian_bruce
The Inkscape v1.1 build fails on amd64, because of a regression test called "text-gzipped-svg-glyph", which can be found here: https://sources.debian.org/src/inkscape/1.1-1/testfiles/rendering_tests/text-gzipped-svg-glyph.svg/ from the build log: Start 301:

Bug#994741: regression tests: skipped vs failed

2021-09-21 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hi Ian, On 2021-09-21 09:52, ian_br...@mail.ru wrote: On i386, the build succeeds, apparently because this test does not run at all: Start 301: render_text-glyphs-vertical 301/302 Test #301: render_text-glyphs-vertical Passed2.65 sec Start 302: