Hello Mattia,
thank you for providing more background on this.
On 2021-09-30 Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
[...]
> Realistically, package-wise, I think they would good by not placing PNGs
> in arch:any packages, that would side-step this issue. And it's the
> proper thing to do anyway so why not.
If
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:27:50PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Unless I am mistaken, this means that any package which
> installs a shared PNG breaks at every binNMU, unless the binNMU is for all
> architectures. Wouldn't it be better if dh_strip_nondeterminism used
Hi Mattia,
Il 29/09/21 19:28, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto:
This is triggered by the binNMU, which varies the date of the changelog,
so that dh_strip_nondeterminism will normalize the metadata of the .png
to the binNMU build time instead of the time of the source upload as it
was before.
Thanks
Control: severity -1 serious
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:57:29PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> libp11-kit-dev:amd64 cannot be installed together with :i386:
a ma:same failing to coinstall is RC in my own book at least, so raising
the severity.
> Unpacking libp11-kit-dev:amd64 (0.24.0-2+b1)
Package: libp11-kit-dev
Version: 0.24.0-2+b1
Severity: important
Hi!
libp11-kit-dev:amd64 cannot be installed together with :i386:
# LANG=C apt install libp11-kit-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were
5 matches
Mail list logo