* Julien Cristau:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>>
>> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
>> > you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
>>
>> To avoid
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:20:16PM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Julien Cristau:
>
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> >> Christoph Biedl wrote...
> >>
> >> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>
> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
> > you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
>
> To avoid this gets lost I've just
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
> you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
To avoid this gets lost I've just uploaded http-parser 2.8.1-1+deb10u2.
Updated debiff attached, only editorial changes since the previous
Julien Cristau wrote...
> Would you mind providing the old/new/proposed versions of http_parser.h?
> (this is me being lazy, sorry, if I'm being too much of a pain I can go
> and figure them out for myself, just let me know).
Not that much on my side, so find the files attached. The name for the
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 12:01:51AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote...
>
> > Do you already have a proposed new upload / debdiff?
>
> After many more tests and some more discussion with Hilko, find attached
> a debdiff that in my opinion is ready for upload. The patch itself
Adam D. Barratt wrote...
> Do you already have a proposed new upload / debdiff?
After many more tests and some more discussion with Hilko, find attached
a debdiff that in my opinion is ready for upload. The patch itself is
unmodified, I just enhanced the description for posterity.
About next
Thanks for your swift and kind response.
Adam D. Barratt wrote...
> On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 09:18 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > ## Rework the patch
> >
> > Revert the ABI break by reworking the patch to restore the previous
> > struct layout - while maintaining the purpose of the change:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Folks,
perhaps I should start with an outright confession: When doing
http-parser version 2.8.1-1+deb10u1 for a buster point release,
I messed up things horribly. Nobody noticed in time, it's
On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 09:18 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> As described in #996939: The fix for CVE-2019-15605 changed, among
> other things, the layout of "struct http_parser", by increasing the
> size of the "flag" field and also its position¹ within the struct.
>
> The latter ought not to do
10 matches
Mail list logo
