On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 00:54:48 +1100 Stuart Prescott wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 November 2021 18:05:57 AEDT Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > I've looked at them and fixed most of the tests locally without issues. I
> > guess I should push that somewhere so that it is visible. I'll start a
> > draft PR
On November 24, 2021 1:54:48 PM UTC, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>On Wednesday, 24 November 2021 18:05:57 AEDT Stuart Prescott wrote:
>> I've looked at them and fixed most of the tests locally without issues. I
>> guess I should push that somewhere so that it is visible. I'll start a
>> draft PR
On Wednesday, 24 November 2021 18:05:57 AEDT Stuart Prescott wrote:
> I've looked at them and fixed most of the tests locally without issues. I
> guess I should push that somewhere so that it is visible. I'll start a
> draft PR with upstream for it.
Now done:
Hi Scott
> > The tests look easy enough to fix, so it's worth trying to do that. (and
> > it's in the Debian group on salsa to make that easy :)
I've looked at them and fixed most of the tests locally without issues. I guess
I should push that somewhere so that it is visible. I'll start a draft
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 01:30:55 +1100 Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Hi Scott & Tobias
>
> On Monday, 15 November 2021 21:13:09 AEDT Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:30:06 -0500 Scott Kitterman
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I looked at this a bit today and it looks like the test failures
Hi Scott & Tobias
On Monday, 15 November 2021 21:13:09 AEDT Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:30:06 -0500 Scott Kitterman
>
> wrote:
> > I looked at this a bit today and it looks like the test failures are due
> > to
> > updates in the iso-codes data used by the tests, not
On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:30:06 -0500 Scott Kitterman
wrote:
I looked at this a bit today and it looks like the test failures are due to
updates in the iso-codes data used by the tests, not any real failures. I
think disabling the failing tests for now would be a reasonable way to keep
this in
I looked at this a bit today and it looks like the test failures are due to
updates in the iso-codes data used by the tests, not any real failures. I
think disabling the failing tests for now would be a reasonable way to keep
this in testing (I'm interested to avoid transitive removal of
8 matches
Mail list logo
