Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-12-06 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Andy, thanks for the confirmation. Happy to hear that. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@sury.org > On 6. 12. 2021, at 14:25, Andy Dorman wrote: > > Hi Ondrej, > > named/bind9.17.20 has been running without a problem for 48 hours now. > > So it appears that this was one of the

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-12-06 Thread Andy Dorman
Hi Ondrej, named/bind9.17.20 has been running without a problem for 48 hours now. So it appears that this was one of the dispatch code bugs that you have fixed. Thanks again for all your work. Have a great holiday season. Andy On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 07:32:35 -0600 Andy Dorman wrote: Hi

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-12-04 Thread Andy Dorman
Hi Ondrej, I have updated the bind9 package to 9.17.20-3 and enabled a core dump in case it crashes. I will report and submit a core dump if anything happens. Thanks again and have a happy holiday. Andy On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 08:23:06 -0600 Andy Dorman wrote: Hi Ondrej, Thanks for looking

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-12-01 Thread Andy Dorman
Hi Ondrej, Thanks for looking at this. I will try it this weekend on the server that had all the problems with 9.17.19. Andy On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 12:15:14 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej_Sur=C3=BD?= wrote: Hi Andy, do you have spare cycles to retest this with 9.17.20? We did fix some bugs

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-11-27 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi Andy, do you have spare cycles to retest this with 9.17.20? We did fix some bugs related to the dispatch code and I was wondering that maybe we fixed this in the process. Cheers, Ondrej On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, at 20:53, Andy Dorman wrote: > Hi Ondrej. > > Bind finally crashed after almost 7

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-11-06 Thread Andy Dorman
I downgraded bind9 to stable, 9.16.15-1, and the crashes have stopped. -- Andy Dorman Ironic Design, Inc. AnteSpam.com

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-11-05 Thread Andy Dorman
Thank you Ondrej, This is Andy. Michael set up the server many years ago and has left us, and I never got around to changing the user address. I have set up the system to produce a core dump on the next crash and restarted named. I will submit the core dump as soon as I have it. Again,

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-11-05 Thread Ondřej Surý
Michael, do you have full coredump available? Ondřej > On 5. 11. 2021, at 3:09, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > > Package: bind9 > Version: 1:9.17.19-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > Named began crashing several times a day after updating from bind 9.16.21-1 > to 9.17.19-1

Bug#998618: bind9.17.19: crashes with INSIST assertion fail resp->disp->active.tail or .head == or != resp

2021-11-04 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.17.19-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Named began crashing several times a day after updating from bind 9.16.21-1 to 9.17.19-1 on Oct 30. Wanted to report this before dropping back to 9.16.21. Some examples of the logs during a crash: