Source: rust-grcov
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
Source: smplayer
Version: 21.8.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
smplayer could not be built
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: roehl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear release team,
the draco library needs a transition after an ABI break due to a
refactored class
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 09:10:26AM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libvirt
> > Version: 7.6.0-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > When feasible, there is a new upstream
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:18:32AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-08-24 14:58:55)
> > for your convenience, I created a merge request on salsa, fixing #989567 as
> > well as #983425.
> >
> >
Source: pgtap
Version: 1.1.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libiksemel
Version: 1.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: ldc
Version: 1:1.24.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: golang-github-gotk3-gotk3
Version: 0.0~GOTK3~0~2~0+git20170418.0.96d4110-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Source: pglogical-ticker
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pgl-ddl-deploy
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: python-cogent
Version: 2021.5.7a+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: open-ath9k-htc-firmware
Version: 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: super
Version: 3.30.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: pgsphere
Version: 1.1.1+2020-10-20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: python-easygui
Version: 0.98.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: php-mockery
Version: 1.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: ring-clojure
Version: 1.6.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: silkaj
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: tiles
Version: 3.0.7-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: toastinfo
Version: 1.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: tensorpipe
Version: 0.0~git20210304.369e855-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: spatial4j-0.4
Version: 0.4.1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: rbac-client-clojure
Version: 0.9.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libdancer-plugin-dbic-perl
Version: 0.2104-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-retape
Version: 0.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: pgaudit
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: qscintilla2
Version: 2.11.6+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: pglogical
Version: 2.3.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/qiime2/q2cli/issues/259
Control: tags -1 upstream
Good day,
Upstream is aware of the issue and is working on a fix [1].
This it is still a work in progress at the moment.
[1]: https://github.com/qiime2/q2cli/pull/260
Have a nice day, :)
--
Étienne
Control: tags -1 + confirmed fixed-upstream pending
Good day,
This issue seems fixed in the latest upstream version 2.0.806.
I'm on it.
Have a nice day, :)
--
Étienne Mollier
Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/9, please excuse my verbosity.
Bastian Germann:
>> In fact there is nowhere in the d/copyright file format to put this
>> information; and it would not be efficient to do so since the information
>> already exists in the d/copyright of those other packages.
>
> Maybe there is nowhere in the DEP-5 format, which is not
Control: retitle -1 ITP: pass-import -- Pass extension for importing ata from
existing password managers
Dear Hans-Christoph,
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote in December 2019:
> * Package name: pass-import
> Version : 2.6
> Upstream Author : Alexandre Pujol
> * URL :
Hi,
On 24/10/21 at 00:23 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> I wasn't able to reproduce the FTBFS. If you look a bit more closely,
> the error is *NOT* "./conftest.c:48: undefined reference to `pow'" which
> is in fact just a warning of the configure script. The error is an test
>
Hi Sandro
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 at 17:35, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> pydata-sphinx-theme 0.7.1 (which contains that fix) has just been
> uploaded to unstable
Great, thanks! I see you temporarily disabled building the docs.
Would it be possible to temporarily drop the Build-Depends on
Package: v4l-utils
Version: 1.22.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Dear maintainer,
Since version 1.22.1-1, v4l-utils fails to build on riscv64:
| v4l2-compliance uses libv4l: yes
| v4l2-compliance-32 : no
| BPF
Quack,
Interestingly we used 8.046.00-1, with 4.19.0-17 until 2021-10-21 and it
worked fine.
Then we upgraded to bullseye and the package was upgraded to 8.048.03-3.
After rebooting the host never came back until we were able to reach the
sever and debug today.
It turns out modprobe was not
On 2021-10-23 08:12, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: fakechroot
> Version: 2.20.1-1
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 + jemalloc
>
> Hi,
>
> libjemalloc and fakechroot do not play well together on arm64 and
> riscv64. Faidon managed to analyze the situation. It follows
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 2:46 AM xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) wrote:
>
> The Salsa's host system, Can ssh to it?
I do not think either one of us can.
> Install locales package is preferably in Docker image,
> /etc/default/locale and /etc/locale.gen will exist in the docker after
> install it.
For
Hello Stephan,
> Possibly relevant:
> - Are you using X11 or Wayland?
Wayland
> - Do you have proprietary graphics drivers installed?
$ lspci -v | grep -A 10 VGA
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620
(rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 00:51 +0800, Marc Gallet wrote:
> Am I to understand that the expected path forward with what is supposed to be
> a minor update offered on oldstable is that everyone shall dump their
> databases,
> delete the data folder,
retitle 924121 RFP: libcassandra-client-perl -- Cassandra::Client - Perl
library for accessing Cassandra
noowner 924121
thanks
I no longer have enough time and enthusiasm to work on packaging
Cassandra-related code. I am starting with giving up ITPs, but I will
maintain already packaged
Hi,
lintian-explain-tags groff-message
[...]
N: You can see the warnings yourself by running the command used by
Lintian:
N:
N: LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 MANROFFSEQ='' MANWIDTH=80 \
N: man --warnings -E UTF-8 -l -Tutf8 -Z >/dev/null
[...]
The "LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8" strings is
The patch attached to this message allows the building of the gcc-avr
package against GCC 11.
It simply changes the type of member x_spill_indirect_levels of structure
target_reload, defined in file gcc/gcc/reload.h, from bool to int. This
member is only used in file gcc/gcc/reload1.c, where
Hello Feri,
Thank you for your advice.
> The upstream version number should be 0.7.0~rc2 with a tilde instead of
> a hyphen to ensure proper ordering (as Lintian warns about). To do such
> transformations automatically, put something like this in the watch file:
>
>
On 24 October 2021 at 11:38, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-10-23 19:44:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as
kindly
| > analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
| > just went
Hi Diane and Sylvestre,
Sorry to drop in, but I was also looking into this and am actually not
sure about Diane's patch. I found some completely different reasons for
why some log lines get missed.
I am also using fail2ban 0.11.2 with exim 4.94.2. Yes, I also see it
misses some lines, but I also
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 6:45 AM xiao sheng wen wrote:
>
> The "LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8" strings is outdated in this command.
With a Chinese default locale, you probably have a lot more experience
with all this, but I do not understand. Lintian does not use
en_US.UTF-8 but C.UTF-8. [1]
Should it
Package: command-not-found
Package version: 0.3
Python version: 3.7.3 final 0
Distributor ID: PureOS
Description: PureOS
Release: 9.0
Codename: amber
Exception information:
local variable 'cnf' referenced before assignment
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
reassign 997370 silversearcher-ag-el 0.48-1
affects emacs-wgrep
fixed 997370 silversearcher-ag-el/0.48-1.1
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Source: emacs-wgrep
> Version: 2.3.2+9.gf0ef9bf-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all
Package: brasero
Version: 3.12.2-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I cannot use brasero easily to burn an AUDIO cd.
When converting mp3 to cue and then burning cue project, brasero get
stuck in an infinite loop and eventually task get killed for inactivity.
Upon inspection it seems the CUE
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:09:53 +0200 Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Jelmer Vernooij:
> > Package: debhelper
> > Version: 13.5.2
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Dear debhelper maintainers,
> >
> > For lintian-brush, it would be really useful if it was possible to discover
> >
Source: rust-spotify-tui
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-rspotify-dev
Source: rust-rusty-tags
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
(I)Dose_applications: --checkonly specified, consider all packages as
background packages
(I)Dose_applications: Solving...
output-version: 1.2
native-architecture: amd64
report:
-
package:
Source: rust-sniffglue
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
report:
-
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package:
Source: rust-bat
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
This package currently FTBFS with:
package: sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy
version: 0.invalid.0
architecture: amd64
status: broken
reasons:
-
missing:
pkg:
package: librust-bindgen+logging-dev
version:
Control: reassign -1 xutils-dev
Control: affects -1 knews
Control: merge 994276 -1
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 11:18:35PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ar clq libWidgets.a ArtText.o ArtTree.o CloseSh.o Dialogue.o FileSel.o
> > Login.o Manager.o Menu.o MenuG.o MenuKnapp.o MenuShell.o
Source: pushpin
Version: 1.32.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: trapperkeeper-status-clojure
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.140
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: erlang-erlware-commons
Version: 1.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: fava
Version: 1.18-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: slony1-2
Version: 2.2.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: wal2json
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: pgfincore
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: skimage
Version: 0.18.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: puppetlabs-http-client-clojure
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: repmgr
Version: 5.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: node-proxyquire
Version: 2.1.3+~1.0.1+~1.0.2-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth
Version: 0.0.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: r-cran-git2r
Version: 0.28.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: trinityrnaseq
Version: 2.11.0+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]:
Source: pg-dirtyread
Version: 2.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Control: close -1
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> > Error: debian/control needs updating from debian/control.in. Run
> > 'pg_buildext updatecontrol'.
> > If you are seeing this message in a buildd log, a sourceful upload is
> > required.
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 5.45+dfsg1-2
Severity: important
I took the habit of running "xscreensaver-command -suspend" when
leaving my desk. However, after ten(s of) seconds, xscreensaver
unblanks and shows the password prompt screen. After timeout, it
blanks again, and after some time,
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:25:23 +0200 jacobkoch...@gmail.com wrote:
> Wayland
> It seems to be the open source driver 'i915' in the package:
> 'xserver-xorg-video-intel'.
> Does not apply. No proprietary graphics drivers installed.
Also try to use Firefox without hardware acceleration. If a process
On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 at 09:27:04 +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> also started to run into this, this breaks two not that uncommon
> use-cases rather badly:
>
> - services that support hot-reloading (via ExecReload) without service
> interruption, as opposed to restarting which does
> -
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:12:40 +0100, Niko Tyni wrote:
> The libnumber-compare-perl and libtext-glob-perl modifications are trivial
> (override dh_perl to dh_perl -d). I suggest modifying at least those
> two packages instead of bundling them.
Both packages uploaded with the suggested 'dh_perl -d'
Hi Aloïs Micard,
Thanks for reply,
Yes, I've built it in newly created vagrant debian vm using pbuilder,
and it works well.
According to the failed log you provided, I wonder if your cpu has
something special.
Could you please provide the lscpu -v output so I can send it to
upstream and find out
Package: allure
Version: 0.9.5.0-2+b1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: davide.pr...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
$ Allure
Allure: SDLCallFailed {sdlExceptionCaller = "SDL.Font.shadedGlyph", sdlFunction
= "TTF_RenderGlyph_Solid", sdlExceptionError = "Couldn't find glyph"}
it seem that the problem is
On 2021-10-23 19:44:49 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> I have now 'patched' the upstream setting of GSL_AGE, this results (as kindly
> analysed by Sebastian) in new sonames '26' so I prepared a new version which
> just went out to unstable.
>
> Unless I am mistaken, I need to get the release
Hello.
I agree. I'm still waiting for fix and don't want to dump/drop/import
data.
JK
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 00:51:08 +0800
Marc Gallet wrote:
> Am I to understand that the expected path forward with what is
> supposed to be a minor update offered on oldstable is that everyone
> shall dump their
The fix is currently waiting in the NEW queue.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Justus!
I have incorporated the changes recommended by Helmut to 20.x alpha build.
I installed kodi:i386 in amd64 container to verify installation completes:
echo "deb [trusted=yes] file:///external-repo ./" >
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/local-repo.list
dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt-get
Sorry for the late reply,
Passing the option "--apt-indices false" to "lb config", is indeed the
correct solution, confirmed by
https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/live-build/lb_config.1.en.html
and my own build results (saved 178MB of APT indices in the squashfs)
Thank you
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:59:11AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 07:46:49 +0100 Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:11:26AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >
> > > I see no reason to move the usrmerge dependencies to perl-base: usrmerge
> > > is supposed to be
Control: reopen -1
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021 19:11:04 +0100 Ximin Luo wrote:
Source: rust-lalrpop
Followup-For: Bug #995339
The d/copyright file is about the source package not the binary package, you
are misinterpreting policy.
In Policy 12.5, I read "Every
This test failure is a known issue which is caused by the expiration
of a CA certificate which was used in the test suite. The problem will
be addressed in 2.18.2, which is expected to be released within the
next day or two.
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reporting!
I've investigated this and found that the error comes from building
against a version of the package "cv_bridge" (libcv-bridge-dev) which
wasn't yet rebuilt against the latest opencv 4.5.4, but for the older
4.5.3.
Does this still qualify as a FTBFS error in
Source: pyqso
Version: 1.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: prefix
Version: 1.2.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: pyrlp
Version: 0.5.1-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: spatial4j
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: node-gulp-tsb
Version: 4.0.5+~cs7.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: fiat
Version: 2019.2.0~git20210116.0439689-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mdtraj
Version: 1.9.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libcomps
Version: 0.1.15-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: fort77
Version: 1.15-11.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: tds-fdw
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
