Package: libllvm14
Version: 1:14.0.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #1014972
X-Debbugs-Cc: compte.perso.de-al...@bbox.fr
i agree with you .
i386 package is missing .
waiting fot it .
for instance , installation of libllvm14 is blocked on my sid .
and forcing it breaks my system .
for example : forcing
Hi,
Quoting Marc Dequènes (duck) (2022-07-12 13:53:47)
> Just to let you know, I now have a working greetd package:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/greetd
removing ~/.cargo let me build enquote and now I tested your greetd package.
Issue 1: your choice of _greetd lets my postinst fail because
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
src:pysph: fails to migrate to testing for too long: new build
dependency not available on ppc64el and s390x
See also #1010862 and #1010961.
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
Control: owner -1 !
I am working on updating this package. You can see my current progress at
https://salsa.debian.org/mymedia/vim-ultisnips
There is however a problem with autookgtest which I set up. The test runner
seems to detect NeoVim wrongly.
Hi Katharina,
Le Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 10:56:06AM +0200, Katharina Drexel a écrit :
[…]
> thanks for the hints. I pushed a new version in the repo
> (https://salsa.debian.org/php-team/pear/php-guzzlehttp-guzzle).
> TBD: someone should upload it in the debian repo.
You may wish to CC:
Package: gnome-tweaks
Version: 42~beta-1
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
X-Debbugs-Cc: compte.perso.de-al...@bbox.fr
alain@sid:~$ apt-cache madison gir1.2-notify-0.7
gir1.2-notify-0.7 |0.8.0-1 | http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main
amd64 Packages
gir1.2-notify-0.7 | 0.7.12-1 |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 01:05:51PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:38:46 +0200 Marc Haber
> wrote:
> > It is really sad that you didn't participate in the discussion in march,
> > where this part of the changes didnt get much attention and noone came
> > up with any
The maintenance of the package will be continued and further
development will be done.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-deriving
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Arthur Azevedo de Amorim
* URL : https://github.com/arthuraa/deriving
* License :
Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2022-07-16 07:56:24)
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Marc Dequènes (duck) (2022-07-12 13:53:47)
> > Just to let you know, I now have a working greetd package:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/greetd
>
> removing ~/.cargo let me build enquote and now I tested your
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 20:01 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Is the use case mirrored installations, thin clients with identical
> disks, cloud installations, or what?
It's easier to handle with configuration management if one just has to
ship the same configuration file to all systems.
One
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 12:28:39 +0100 Laurent Bigonville
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 13:14:48 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There's a proposal to add a pkexec action for update-alternatives.
> So when I went checking for the documentation of the file
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-mtac2
Version : 1.4+8.15
Upstream Author : Jan-Oliver Kaiser and Beta Ziliani
* URL : https://github.com/Mtac2/Mtac2
* License
Since some time doxygen has a WARN_AS_ERROR config option:
https://doxygen.nl/manual/config.html#cfg_warn_as_error
Since version 1.9.1 or 1.9.2 if that is set to YES, graphviz's dot is
absent but HAVE_DOT=YES is set, doxygen will stop and exit with status
of 1 (upstream choose this opt-in way
Source: murano-dashboard
Version: 1:13.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: sahara-dashboard
Version: 16.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: perl6-readline
Version: 0.1.5-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: python-dbusmock
Version: 0.28.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: python-shapely
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: pagure
Version: 5.11.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>dh_build
Source: decopy
Version: 0.2.4.6-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-websocket
Version: 1.0.34+~cs10.0.25-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: node-shiny-server
Version: 1.5.17.973-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: getdns
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: asdf-astropy
Version: 0.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: daps
Version: 3.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: php-nesbot-carbon
Version: 2.58.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-asdf
Version: 2.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: stopt
Version: 5.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> 18: realVa
Source: cataclysm-dda
Version: 0.F-3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -Wdate-t
Source: golang-gopkg-goose.v1
Version: 0.0~git20170406.3228e4f-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pytest-astropy-header
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: pytest-doctestplus
Version: 0.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: matplotlib
Version: 3.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: pytest-qt
Version: 4.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Adam,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 03:32:55PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> The _correct_ way would be to write that dependency as
> 'systemd-tmpfiles | systemd' which is no-op on systemd installs but
> avoids init switch elsewhere.
Thanks. That is a good suggestion.
Michael,
I know this issue was
Andreas,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 9:03 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2022 18.35, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Since the nvidia* package do the heavy lifting of downloading locally
> > binary, it would make sense to add yet-another package for firmware
> > related within the group.
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 968467 by -1
* Package name: presets
Upstream Author : Brian McFee
* URL : https://github.com/bmcfee/presets
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Python
Description : python module to manipulate default function
On Saturday, July 16, 2022 12:28:33 P.M. CDT Christian Marillat wrote:
> On 16 juil. 2022 12:02, Steven Robbins wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Certainly one can propose. However, one cannot really expect upstream to
> > change their architecture away from ffmpeg by a given time any more than
> > one
Control: reassign -1 src:libnotify
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: affects -1 src:gnome-tweaks src:comfy src:gnome-gmail src:isenkram
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 9:09 AM alain wrote:
>
> Package: gnome-tweaks
> Version: 42~beta-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: merge 1015008 -1
Control: affects -1 + guake mate-tweak
On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 23:18:14 -0300, Ernesto Domato wrote:
> Hi, I have two packages (guake and mate-tweak) which uses Python and after
> upgrading gir1.2-notify-0.7 from version 0.7.12-1 to 0.8.0-1
Package: browserpass
Hi,
please update the embedded browserpass-native to the current upstream
version (3.0.10).
Regards,
Daniel
* Marc Haber [220714 14:10]:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:20:48PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Well, the pam_keyinit man page says it was written by David Howells
> > , but I don't know if he is still working on
> > it.
>
> I reached out to that address a few months ago, they didnt
Source: manila-ui
Version: 7.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-leveldown
Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: python-limits
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-nan
Version: 2.16.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-configurable-http-proxy
Version: 4.5.0+~cs15.1.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-modern-syslog
Version: 1.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-iconv
Version: 3.0.1+~3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: parfive
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: asdf-standard
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: trove-dashboard
Version: 18.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gap-hap
Version: 1.44-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: rust-sequoia-sq
Version: 0.26.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: raku-getopt-long
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: datalad-container
Version: 1.1.6-0.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: sagemath
Version: 9.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Enter
Source: radio-beam
Version: 0.3.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: senlin-dashboard
Version: 5.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: freedink
Version: 109.6-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFI
Source: pytest-astropy
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: latex-cjk-chinese-arphic
Version: 1.24
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Read
Source: python-pluggy
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Craig,
Thanks for this.
What release are you upgrading from an to?
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 06:34:35PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 246.9.1-1+debian1
>
> I don't know if a newer version of elogind would help here, but it
> probably wouldn't hurt. elogind in debian
Package: wfuzz
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian.fm...@guillaume-d.info
Dear maintainer(s),
wfuzz seems to needs python3-distutils.
However the dependency is missing from "Depends:".
It probably only work for people who have python3-full and/or
python3-all installed, but
Hi debian-devel (2022.07.16_09:12:16_+)
> I guess we should expose this in our conference statistics. We care
> about it.
And in the future, we will:
https://salsa.debian.org/debconf-team/public/websites/wafer-debconf/-/merge_requests/150
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
On Wed, 06 Jul 2022 09:52:41 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-07-06 at 09:27 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > To my surprise this definition doesn't seem to take effect,
> > Either define or undef can build riscv64 package here.
>
> Probably the code that uses the definition is not adequately
Craig,
Thanks.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:07:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> A little more investigation reveals that it's udev.
>
> udev 2.51.3-1 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:05:40 +0200) now depends on 'systemd |
> systemd-tmpfiles'.
Great. systemd-tmpfiles is a virtual package that is also
reassign 1015088 src:golang-1.18
found 1015088 golang-1.18/1.18.4-1
affects 1015088 src:icingadb
thanks
On 7/16/22 15:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
dh_auto_build
cd _build && go version
go version go1.18.4 linux/amd64
cd _build && go env
GO111MODULE="on"
GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
Hi! and thanks for reporting.
I am in the process of packaging doxygen 1.9.4 and this issue seems to
be fixed in that version.
To test, I did this twice:
cd `mktemp -d`
git clone https://github.com/BYVoid/OpenCC
cd OpenCC/
cd doc
# no need to run cmake etc. just quickly
On Sat, July 16, 2022 15:49, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 16.07.22 um 04:56 schrieb Dwight Walker:
>>
>
>> Processing triggers for libglib2.0-0:amd64 (2.66.8-1) ...
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/glib-compile-schemas: symbol lookup
>> error:
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 at 17:04, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > /usr/bin/ld: bobuser.p/bobuser.c.o: in function `main':
> > ./b 52a78b9866/../test cases/failing build/2 hidden symbol/bobuser.c:4:
> > undefined reference to `hidden_function'
> > collect2: error: ld returned
Source: libgrokj2k
Version: 9.7.5-1
Severity: serious
This package failed to build on armel, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el and
s390x, but built successfully on them in the past.
In case these architectures are not supported, the old binaries
should be removed.
--
Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 19:59 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 06:29:55PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > > From man:machine-id(5):
> >
> > +---
> > > The machine ID is usually generated from a random source during
> > > system installation or first boot and stays constant for all
>
A quick update.
The package broke a number of packages, and problems are being addressed
in Unstable before jsonschema can be uploaded there.
Namely, I have already fixed:
- designate
- nova
- python-warlock
patches were provided upstream.
I'm currently working on:
- ironic
- sahara
I'm
Quoting Enrico Zini (2022-07-16 10:17:11)
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 12:43:16PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
>
> > I've been writing some code to work out the gender balance of speakers at a
> > conference. It parses the pentabarf XML of the schedule and feeds the
> > speaker
> > names to this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: rust-crdts
Version : 7.1.0
Upstream Author : David Rusu , Tyler Neely
* URL :
On 2022-07-10, at 17:19:16 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> The related xtables-addons bug is:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1014680
>
> [
I reproduced with the attached minimal example and no warning is printed.
Upstream issue is also closed.
Will now close.
P.
test.tar.xz
Description: application/xz
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 at 16:52:30 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Running suite(s):
> main
> opts
> Cannot resolve address '127.0.0.1' port '10443': Name or service not known
This reminds me of an issue that used to affect the dbus and GLib test
suites:
Source: mako
Version: 1.1.3+ds1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: borgbackup
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-expat
Version: 2.4.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-dagre-d3-renderer
Version: 0.6.4+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: crust-firmware
Version: 0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: node-re2
Version: 1.17.7+~cs2.13.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: thrift
Version: 0.16.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[7]: Enter
Source: heat-dashboard
Version: 7.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: terminator
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: node-opencv
Version: 7.0.0+git20200316.f0a03a4b-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: qepcad
Version: 1.74+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /
Source: php-ps
Version: 1.4.4+1.3.7-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc vers
Source: gcc-12-cross-ports
Version: 2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: ayatana-indicator-power
Version: 22.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> m
Source: pcb
Version: 1:4.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking if GIF out
Source: sshuttle
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: python-cloup
Version: 0.15.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: vitrage-dashboard
Version: 3.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
php-numbers-words is not maintained upstream, and was not part of stable
since Stretch.
TIA
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
