Bug#1001669: closed by Debian FTP Masters

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:11:34 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Aniol_Mart=c3=ad?= wrote: On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 19:09:46 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 19:24:05 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Aniol_Mart=c3=ad?= wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2022 09:09:00 +0100 Aniol Martí > > wrote:> I've tried

Bug#1016125: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to gregor herrmann ) (Bug#1016125: fixed in libgnupg-interface-perl 1.02-2)

Hi, On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:54:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: [..snip..] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Format: 1.8 > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:13:53 +0200 > Source: libgnupg-interface-perl > Architecture: source > Version: 1.02-2 > Distribution:

Bug#1015031: irssi-plugin-xmpp: FTBFS: xep/ping.c:169:37: error: request for member ‘tv_sec’ in something not a structure or union

Package: irssi-plugin-xmpp Followup-For: Bug #1015031 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu kinetic ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: scho...@ubuntu.com Control: tags -1 patch In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * d/p/gtimeval-build-fix.patch:

Bug#1013875: lintian: false-postive for experimental-to-unstable-without-comment

An alternative fix, suggested by dwfreed on #debian-qa, would be to add a `/x` modifier to the current regex in `Changelog.pm` (`/x` ignores whitespace in the regex, increasing its readability): - !~ m{ \b to \s+ ['"‘“]? (?:unstable|sid) ['"’”]? \b }im; + !~ m{ \b to \s+ ['"‘“]?

Bug#1016189: RM: memtest86 -- RoQA; obsolete, buggy, alternatives exist

Am Freitag, dem 29.07.2022 um 00:05 +0200 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@debian.org, fantonifa...@tiscali.it, > fziel...@z-51.de > > Dear FTP Masters, > > please remove memtest86. As stated by the last maintainer in #969192, >

Bug#1013035: sgt-puzzles: ftbfs with GCC-12

Ben Hutchings wrote: > I should patch out the use of -Werror in this package though. FWIW, I've already done this upstream. Since commit 79a5378 I've completely reworked the build system (it's now a unified cmake setup rather than my own horrible mkfiles.pl cruft feeding into autotools), and

Bug#1015845: about gtkhash ITA

The next version of Nautilus, 43, will switch to GTK4. I believe this will break all Nautilus extensions. I intend to file a bug about it for all packaged Nautilus extensions soon. The gtkhash package would still be useful since it offers extensions for other file managers. Thank you, Jeremy

Bug#1008220: flexbar 3.5.0-4 FTBFS against libtbb-dev 2021.5.0-7

Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/seqan/flexbar/issues/38

Bug#925591: grub-install fails on raid1+efi setup

Installing ESP on software raid may not be a good idea, even if raid metadata is at the end of partitions. Perhaps, a better approach would be to add procedural ESP duplication via hooks in grub and whatever else needs to write to /boot/efi (potentially debian-installer?). Basic concept of a

Bug#1016206: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.6.2+git20220728-1 -- Desktop package for budgie-desktop

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "budgie-desktop": * Package name: budgie-desktop Version : 10.6.2+git20220728-1 Upstream Author : Budgie Developers * URL :

Bug#1016203: vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14)

Control: tags -1 + patch A patch to fix this problem can be found at https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/-/merge_requests/38 -- Gioele Barabucci

Bug#1016205: openvswitch-switch: Missing libofproto after update

Package: openvswitch-switch Version: 2.15.0+ds1-2+deb11u1 Severity: critical Tags: d-i Justification: breaks the whole system X-Debbugs-Cc: jochen.ko...@pcsm.de -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy:

Bug#962715: Incompatible API versions: encoded with [1,17,5,4] but attempted to decode with [1,20]

Quoting Eric Marsden (2022-07-24 16:06:41) > Just to note that this issue has appeared again. pandoc-sidenote version > 0.22.1.0-1+b1 is built against pandoc-types version [1,22,2], but the > versions of pandoc available are built against lower versions ([1,21] > for the version in

Bug#1015845: about gtkhash ITA

Hello Sheng Wen, On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:08:20 +0800 =?UTF-8?B?eGlhbyBzaGVuZyB3ZW4o6IKW55ub5paHKQ==?= wrote: >     Do you want ITA gtkhash package now? > This package had orphan now, see #1015845. > > If you don't want ITA it, I would do ITA. please feel free to ITA this package. I don't have

Bug#1016189: RM: memtest86 -- RoQA; obsolete, buggy, alternatives exist

Il 29/07/2022 00:05, Chris Hofstaedtler ha scritto: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@debian.org, fantonifa...@tiscali.it, fziel...@z-51.de Dear FTP Masters, please remove memtest86. As stated by the last maintainer in #969192, alternatives exist. Actually it appears

Bug#1016203: vcswatch: check debian/latest branch as well (DEP-14)

Package: qa.debian.org Dear vcswatch maintainers, could you please add support for repositories that use `debian/latest` as the branch for their packaging work? DEP-14 states: > In Debian this means that uploads to unstable and experimental should > be prepared either in the `debian/latest`

Bug#1006020: RFS: pacman-package-manager/6.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple library-based package manager

On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 22:55 -0400, Ben Westover wrote: > Hello Luca and Michel, > > On 7/28/22 5:50 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > I was independently working on pacman, and (thanks to the name > > collision with the existing pacman package) didn't notice this until > > it's

Bug#1012067: [Pkg-freeipa-devel] Bug#1012067: Bug#1012067: Bug#1012067: jss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: no such provider SunJSSE

Timo Aaltonen kirjoitti 28.7.2022 klo 14.14: Emmanuel Bourg kirjoitti 28.7.2022 klo 13.36: Le 2022-07-28 09:49, Timo Aaltonen a écrit : Rebuilding jss with openjdk 11 fails just the same way, so the failure is not caused by jdk 17 but something else.. It seems to build fine with OpenJDK 11

Bug#1006471: ruby3.0: reproducible builds: embeds path to various binaries

Control: tag -1 + pending On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 02:52:47PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Is the Ruby build intentionally putting EGREP into rbconfig.rb for use by > some other component, or is it just populating that file with everything > that Autoconf happens to have discovered, on the off

Bug#1016208: jenkins.debian.org: downloading artifacts from tests.reproducible-builds.org

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 01:49:22PM +0200, Paolo Greppi wrote: > Hi, I am looking at the reproducible build results for doxygen: > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/doxygen.html > > If I remember well, previously it was possible to download the build > artifacts

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

my humble opinion is that it dislikes dash dpkg-reconfigure dash for some reasons is not giving me any options it just fails silently On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:49 PM Renato Gallo wrote: > the no theme furo error is solved by > pip3 install sphinx-rtd-theme > plus is needed to install zsh

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

plus compiling with dpkg-buildpackage -b -rfakeroot -us -uc using the old http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kitty/kitty_0.21.2-1.debian.tar.xz fails with an error Theme error: " no theme named 'furo' found (missing theme.conf?)" On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:36 PM Renato Gallo wrote: > I am

Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks

Hello Bastian! > Disabling all tests is a bit of a stretch. Please disable > only those who > need these deprecated classes. > It should be enough to disable test_display and mpl_ic. In fact, of the 20 tests that the tests directory has, 12 have errors. It didn't make sense for me to ignore them

Bug#1015169: RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1 [ITP] -- Common metrics for common audio/music processing tasks

Am 29.07.22 um 14:44 schrieb Nilson Silva: A total of 356 tests passed out of 250. I think it was better than ignoring the wrong ones or disabling everything. Did you mix up the number here? I read 356/250 tests pass, which is impossible.

Bug#1016209: mangohud fails with symbol lookup error

Package: mangohud Version: 0.6.7.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: mister...@web.de Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? I tried to launch an/any application with mangohud. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was

Bug#1016210: qtcreator: segmentation error

Package: qtcreator Version: 8.0.0-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, after update to version 8.0.0-2 Qtcreator does not work and returns this error: $ qtcreator "DebuggerItem \"/usr/bin/lldb-13\" ({197a9639-d6c2-4835-95b7-5d886b6613c5}) read from

Bug#1016211: ITP urwid-readline --Text input widget for urwidt hatsupports readline shortcuts

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: urwid-readline Version : 0.13 Upstream Author : Marcin Kurczewski * URL : https://github.com/rr-/urwid_readline * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : Text input widget for urwid that

Bug#1009691: libusb-1.0-0: Some USB microphone takes sounds as very low volume

Hi, On 2022-04-14 22:41, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > On 2022-04-14 19:41, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Package: libusb-1.0-0 > > Version: 2:1.0.26-1 > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: henr...@debian.org > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > With upgrading libusb-1.0-0 package from 2:1.0.25-1

Bug#1016208: jenkins.debian.org: downloading artifacts from tests.reproducible-builds.org

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 01:54:00PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I've just done so, I'll come back to you once it's built and I have a > link to the artifacts. doxygen/amd64: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/artifacts/r00t-me/unstable_amd64_doxygen_tmp-QHn19/ You have only 24 hours

Bug#1016207: abpoa FTBFS on !amd64: error: unknown type name ‘__m128’

Source: abpoa Version: 1.4.1-2 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=abpoa=1.4.1-2 ... In file included from python/pyabpoa.c:700: include/simd_instruction.h:468:9: error: unknown type name ‘__m128’ 468 | typedef __m128 SIMDf; //for floats |

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

Package: kitty Version: 0.21.2-1+b1 Followup-For: Bug #1011079 Dear Maintainer, The kitty release of 0.21.2 is from a year ago (release 2021-06-28) per https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/changelog/ Could we get a bump to 0.25.2 released 2022-06-07? Many thanks! Wesley

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

I am building the debs of the latest git release python3-sphinx deps are a must On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:15 PM Wesley Schwengle wrote: > Package: kitty > Version: 0.21.2-1+b1 > Followup-For: Bug #1011079 > > Dear Maintainer, > > The kitty release of 0.21.2 is from a year ago (release

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

I am building the debs of the latest git release python3-sphinx deps are a must On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:36 PM Renato Gallo wrote: > I am building the debs of the latest git release python3-sphinx deps are a > must > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 2:15 PM Wesley Schwengle > wrote: > >> Package:

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, 08:15 Wesley Schwengle wrote: > The kitty release of 0.21.2 is from a year ago (release 2021-06-28) per > https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/changelog/ > > Could we get a bump to 0.25.2 released 2022-06-07? > The same issues I already mentioned still apply. The new version

Bug#1011079: kitty: New upstream release

the no theme furo error is solved by pip3 install sphinx-rtd-theme plus is needed to install zsh and fish but still deb compilation fails with test_exe (kitty_tests.check_build.TestBuild) ... ok test_filesystem_locations (kitty_tests.check_build.TestBuild) ... ok test_glfw_modules

Bug#986498: evqueue-core: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation

Hi Thibault, No, they are different because "pt" is for portuguese from Portugal and pt_BR is for brazilian portuguese. Best regards, On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:10:23 +0200 Thibault Kummer wrote: Hi, Is it meant to replace the pt.po file ? Regards, Le mer. 7 avr. 2021 à 04:39, Paulo

Bug#1011284: popularity-contest: d/postinst: remove bash dependency, fix shellcheck

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 05:05:43PM +0200, наб wrote: > Source: popularity-contest > Version: 1.74 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > d/postinst hard-depends on bash to generate random days/hours/minutes; > however, > od -d -An -N2 /dev/urandom > is equivalent to >

Bug#1011155:

As one of the maintainers of pyca/cryptography, I'm strongly in favor of upgrading. Older releases do not receive support (including security fixes) from the maintainers. And in the past few releases we've added many new features, support for more strong cryptographic algorithms, and significantly

Bug#1016212: squirrel3: CVE-2021-41556

Source: squirrel3 X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: important Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for squirrel3. CVE-2021-41556[0]: | sqclass.cpp in Squirrel through 2.2.5 and 3.x through 3.1 allows an | out-of-bounds read (in the core interpreter) that

Bug#1016139: (net-snmp: CVE-2022-24810 CVE-2022-24809 CVE-2022-24808 CVE-2022-24807 CVE-2022-24806 CVE-2022-24805)

Am Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 09:25:44PM +1000 schrieb Craig Small: > I said: > > > I had uploaded net-snmp 5.9.3 anyway but I'll add those CVEs to the > > changelog. > > I'm trying to find where they've made the changes to see if it is possible > > to get at least bullseye fixed. > > > I've had a look

Bug#1016208: jenkins.debian.org: downloading artifacts from tests.reproducible-builds.org

Package: jenkins.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: paolo.gre...@libpf.com Severity: normal Hi, I am looking at the reproducible build results for doxygen: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/doxygen.html If I remember well, previously it was possible to download the build

Bug#1010027: python3-paraview: pvpython does not run scripts

Package: python3-paraview Version: 5.10.1-2+b1 Followup-For: Bug #1010027 The bug is still present in 5.10.1-2+b1, and it affects both pvpython and (arguably even worse) pvbatch. It seems that the command-line options are never even read, even putting in a bogus file name like: pvbatch

Bug#1015978: Should falcon be removed?

Am Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 10:06:03PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Unfortunately the package does not build[1] which is probably a gcc > issue. If someone would volunteer to fix this issue we might be able to > keep the package. If there is no response in say two weeks we should > probably remove

Bug#1014870: perlrdf: Source-only upload is needed

Control: retitle -1 perlrdf: fails test 'output contains some known data' Quoting Boyuan Yang (2022-07-13 16:21:37) > Source: perlrdf > Version: 0.004-3 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-CC: d...@jones.dk > > Dear Debian perlrdf package maintainer, > > According to

Bug#1016004: lightdm: re-login possible without password after "dm-tool lock"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 08:23 +0200, HG wrote: > * start a terminal, type: "dm-tool lock" >     (It is a frequent hint in the internet to have a graphical shortcut for > this commant in order to generate a "lock user session" functionality on the >

Bug#1016213: clang-tidy-14: clang-tidy aborts when run

Package: clang-tidy-14 Version: 1:14.0.6-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: aa...@kde.org Running clang-tidy-14 asserts, example I have run the same in archlinux clang-tidy-14 and it does not assert, so I think it may be a Debian specific issue clang-tidy-14 --use-color -p=/tmp/poppler_build

Bug#1014052: ibus:After rebooted, I must do `ibus-daemon -rxd` change japanese to anthy with kanji key.

On 2022-07-29 17:30, Yukiharu YABUKI wrote: I did execute im-config. Then I choose ibus. So im-config made ~/.xinputrc ~/.xinput contains # im-config(8) generated on Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:23:42 +0900 run_im ibus # im-config signature: f863f9b702709aac186b408cc110240c - ``` Ok, that should

Bug#1016214: calibre: Does not start with wayland

calibre works on bookworm wayland On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 5:27 PM Thomas Renard wrote: > Package: calibre > Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > The system does not start with wayland (as error shows) > > * Open GNOME-Desktop under Wayland > * start calibre > >

Bug#1016217: Update gitlab to new upstream version 15.1.4

On 7/29/22 9:26 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: Package: gitlab Version: 15.0.4+ds1-1 Severity: important x-debbugs-cc: debian...@lists.debian.org While trying to build gitlab 15.1.4, build failed with error # gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/workhorse /usr/bin/ld: $WORK/b271/_pkg_.a(_go_.o): in

Bug#1016235: passwordsafe: FTBFS: pws_time.cpp:30:10: error: ‘localtime_r’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘localtime64_r’?

Source: passwordsafe Version: 1.12.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -g -O2

Bug#1016236: uhd: FTBFS: awaitable.hpp:68:19: error: ‘exchange’ is not a member of ‘std’; did you mean ‘std::__atomic_impl::exchange’?

Source: uhd Version: 4.2.0.0+ds1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/c++

Bug#1016237: efl: FTBFS: jquery is used Error 1

Source: efl Version: 1.26.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering

Bug#1016238: autofdo: FTBFS: llvm_profile_writer.cc:54:42: error: cannot convert ‘const llvm::StringMap’ to ‘const llvm::sampleprof::SampleProfileMap&’ {aka ‘const s

Source: autofdo Version: 0.19-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H

Bug#1016220: sssd: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: sssd Version: 2.7.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering

Bug#1016221: rust-protobuf-codegen-pure: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: librust-protobuf-2.25.2+default-dev, librust-protobuf-codegen-2.25.2+default-dev

Source: rust-protobuf-codegen-pure Version: 2.25.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1016222: sahara: FTBFS: TypeError: create..Validator.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'types'

Source: sahara Version: 1:16.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1016219: clucene-core: FTBFS: DateTools.cpp:26:19: error: ‘gmtime’ was not declared in this scope

Source: clucene-core Version: 2.3.3.4+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016223: binutils-or1k-elf: FTBFS: stdlib.h:134:10: error: argument 1 is null but the corresponding size argument 3 value is [128, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=nonnull]

Source: binutils-or1k-elf Version: 1.0.5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc

Bug#1016227: openbabel: FTBFS: obutil.h:65:14: error: ‘clock’ was not declared in this scope

Source: openbabel Version: 3.1.1+dfsg-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016228: python-taskflow: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

Source: python-taskflow Version: 4.6.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > File

Bug#1016226: entropybroker: FTBFS: graph.cpp:160:33: error: ‘localtime’ was not declared in this scope

Source: entropybroker Version: 2.9-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -g -O2

Bug#1016224: binutils-z80: FTBFS: stdlib.h:134:10: error: argument 1 is null but the corresponding size argument 3 value is [128, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=nonnull]

Source: binutils-z80 Version: 4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H

Bug#1016225: boinc: FTBFS: sched_util.cpp:115:23: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: boinc Version: 7.20.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash

Bug#1016239: metview: FTBFS: DateTime.h:28:25: error: '::time' has not been declared

Source: metview Version: 5.16.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016240: xeus-python: FTBFS: xdebugger.cpp:278:18: error: ‘clog’ is not a member of ‘std’

Source: xeus-python Version: 0.12.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/c++

Bug#1016241: xprobe: FTBFS: tcp.cc:31:15: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: xprobe Version: 0.3-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -g -O2

Bug#1016242: jss: FTBFS: undefined reference to `PK11_PubUnwrapSymKeyWithMechanism'

Source: jss Version: 5.1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld:

Bug#1016229: rapidjson: FTBFS: memorystream.h:47:59: error: pointer used after ‘void free(void*)’ [-Werror=use-after-free]

Source: rapidjson Version: 1.1.0+dfsg2-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016230: auctex: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `hypdoc.sty' not found.

Source: auctex Version: 12.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]: Entering

Bug#1016231: glosstex: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `hypdoc.sty' not found.

Source: glosstex Version: 0.4.dfsg.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]:

Bug#1016233: sonic-visualiser: FTBFS: ld: piper-vamp-simple-server.p/piper-vamp-cpp_vamp-server_simple-server.cpp.o: undefined reference to symbol 'serd_node_from_string'

Source: sonic-visualiser Version: 4.5-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > c++ -o

Bug#1016232: auto-multiple-choice: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: Command \code already defined.

Source: auto-multiple-choice Version: 1.5.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[3]:

Bug#1016234: feynmf: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `hypdoc.sty' not found.

Source: feynmf Version: 1.08-13 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering

Bug#1016287: release.debian.org: autopkgtest 2 to 5 days since addition of armel

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, when a package pass all autopkgtests it can migrate in 2 days, however if it depends on an architecture that reports "Not a regression", it seems that the bonus is lost and the

Bug#1016286: Bogus warnings about missing firmware (nvidia) while updating initramfs

Package: firmware-misc-nonfree Version: 20210315-3 Severity: normal Hello, When invoking update-initramfs (e.g., after a kernel update), I'm getting a bunch of warnings: Configurando linux-image-5.10.0-16-amd64 (5.10.127-2) ... /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: update-initramfs:

Bug#1016214: calibre: Does not start with wayland

Package: calibre Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The system does not start with wayland (as error shows) * Open GNOME-Desktop under Wayland * start calibre Expected behaviour: Calibre starts and shows up window Actual behaviour: (from console output) This

Bug#1016282: qcoro: FTBFS: qcorosignal.h:225:14: error: ‘((Data**)((char*) + offsetof(std::optional >,std::optional >::.std::_

Source: qcoro Version: 0.6.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016281: pirs: FTBFS: pirs_diploid.cpp:322:34: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: pirs Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-10 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++

Bug#1016283: onetbb: FTBFS: _segment_table.h:63:63: error: member ‘tbb::detail::d1::segment_table, 128>, tbb::detail::d1::cache_aligned_alloc

Source: onetbb Version: 2021.5.0-12 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/c++

Bug#1016284: mpdscribble: FTBFS: ../src/Log.cxx:48:13: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: mpdscribble Version: 0.24-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > c++

Bug#1016275: ccls: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/src.cxx:11: undefined reference to `pthread_create'

Source: ccls Version: 0.20210330-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld:

Bug#1016273: blackbox: FTBFS: Toolbar.cc:260:17: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: blackbox Version: 0.70.1-38 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++

Bug#1016276: sight: FTBFS: shared_ptr_base.h:1759:59: error: array subscript ‘sight::core::com::Slot, const std::__cxx11::basic_string&)>

Source: sight Version: 21.1.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016277: qbs: FTBFS: ERROR: /usr/bin/ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,-s'

Source: qbs Version: 1.22.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > 3: ERROR: /usr/bin/ld:

Bug#1016264: maliit-framework: FTBFS: qtestcase.h:352:34: error: no match for ‘operator==’ (operand types are ‘const MImServerCommonOptions’ and ‘const MImServerCommonOptions’)

Source: maliit-framework Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/c++

Bug#1016266: fakeroot-ng: FTBFS: process.cpp:90:21: error: ‘CLONE_PARENT’ was not declared in this scope

Source: fakeroot-ng Version: 0.18-4.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++

Bug#1016267: android-platform-frameworks-base: FTBFS: libs/androidfw/Util.cpp:72:50: error: no template named 'function' in namespace 'std'

Source: android-platform-frameworks-base Version: 1:10.0.0+r36-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#1016270: havp: FTBFS: logfile.cpp:111:22: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: havp Version: 0.93-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > g++ -g -O2

Bug#1016271: octave: FTBFS: liboctave/numeric/randmtzig.cc:274:22: error: ‘clock’ was not declared in this scope

Source: octave Version: 7.1.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash ./libtool

Bug#1016272: ruby-kramdown: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: invalid byte sequence in UTF-8

Source: ruby-kramdown Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > ArgumentError:

Bug#1016278: lomiri-app-launch: FTBFS: jobs-base.cpp:1023:32: error: variable ‘std::array args’ has initializer but incomplete type

Source: lomiri-app-launch Version: 0.1.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016279: libzypp: FTBFS: Random.cc:21:27: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: libzypp Version: 17.25.7-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

Bug#1016280: shim-signed: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: shim-unsigned (= 15.4-7)

Source: shim-signed Version: 1.38 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1016274: qtsystems-opensource-src: FTBFS: qdeviceinfo.cpp:308:63: error: virt-specifiers in ‘connectNotify’ not allowed outside a class definition

Source: qtsystems-opensource-src Version: 5.0~git20190103.e3332ee+dfsg1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant

Bug#1016269: smlsharp: FTBFS: configure: error: Specify --with-incompatible-llvm if you really want to build SML# with it.

Source: smlsharp Version: 4.0.0+git20211227.5af5945b-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1016268: nordugrid-arc: FTBFS: GUID.cpp:82:13: error: ‘time’ was not declared in this scope

Source: nordugrid-arc Version: 6.15.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/bash

Bug#1014052: ibus:After rebooted, I must do `ibus-daemon -rxd` change japanese to anthy with kanji key.

Hi, I did execute im-config. Then I choose ibus. So im-config made ~/.xinputrc ~/.xinput contains # im-config(8) generated on Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:23:42 +0900 run_im ibus # im-config signature: f863f9b702709aac186b408cc110240c - ``` On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:51:10 +0200 Gunnar Hjalmarsson

Bug#1014052: ibus:After rebooted, I must do `ibus-daemon -rxd` change japanese to anthy with kanji key.

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Yukiharu YABUKI > To: Gunnar Hjalmarsson > Cc: Osamu Aoki , 1014...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#1014052: ibus:After rebooted, I must do `ibus-daemon -rxd` > change > japanese to anthy with kanji key. > Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 00:30:02 +0900 > >

Bug#1016243: python-canmatrix: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting

Source: python-canmatrix Version: 0.9.5~github-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >

Bug#1016245: mrpt: FTBFS: nanoflann.hpp:656:5: error: expected identifier before numeric constant

Source: mrpt Version: 1:2.5.0+ds-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd

  1   2   3   >