Hello,
Javascript/Npm are not my cup of tea; so, please receive many thanks
about the help you provided to my poor packaging efforts.
If node-html5-qrcode happens to be dfsg-free, which should be the right
umbrella to host it on salsa.d.o? https://salsa.debian.org/js-team or
This kernel bug is now fixed, since binutils will now
support hppa64 binaries as well. See bz #1059674
Package: supysonic
Version: 0.7.2+ds-2
Followup-For: Bug #1059807
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@users.sourceforge.net
Dear Maintainer,
some files stream, others do not. In some cases, contains:
uncaught Mutagen exception in loadfile: 'ascii' codec can't encode character
'\\u2014' in position 108:
Package: megapixels
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainers,
as noted in #1060658 there's no support for any of the Librem 5 cameras
yet. It would be great if megapixels would support them out of the box
as at least the selfie cam driver and the necessary SoC bits are
> That is false, GNOME Software on Debian does depend on s-p-gtk. The
> reason this was implemented is that the PackageKit repository
> preferences dialog does not cover all the options needed on a Debian
> system, and especially not when used on an Ubuntu system.
> Instead of giving users an
The CVEs listed in this bug report do NOT affect GT.M V7.0-005, the current
Debian version listed on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fis-gtm. There is no
reason for this bug report. Please close it. I will upload a newer version of
GT.M, V7.1-002, later this month.
Thanks,
Amul
The information
> Fair point. We could maybe make it so g-s-p is only a recommended
> dependency
That is what this request is requesting. Just a change from depend to
recommend
> and modify the code so when g-s-p is not available, it
> falls back to the GS dialog.
I'm not sure what code you're referring to,
Hello,
On Tue, 2024-01-16 at 15:53 +0100, Richard wrote:
> Am Mo., 15. Jan. 2024 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
> > On Mon, 2024-01-15 at 19:29 +0100, Richard wrote:
> > > I second this report. The app did use to work actually, but recently -
> > > not sure with
> > >
Source: python-xkcd
Version: 2.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: octave-audio
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: bmusb
Version: 0.7.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: libslf4j-java
Version: 1.7.32-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: paramiko
Version: 2.12.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: clapper
Version: 0.5.2-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: python-pure-sasl
Version: 0.5.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: q2-feature-classifier
Version: 2023.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: openlp
Version: 3.0.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: navarp
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: android-platform-external-libunwind
Version: 10.0.0+r36-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: mdtraj
Version: 1.9.7-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-pbcore
Version: 2.1.2+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: openturns
Version: 1.21.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: obs-scene-notes-dock
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: telepathy-farstream
Version: 0.6.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: obs-downstream-keyer
Version: 0.2.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc
Source: dfdatetime
Version: 20210509-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cppad
Version: 2024.00.00.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: datalad-container
Version: 1.1.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: python-procrunner
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: apertium-es-ro
Version: 0.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: dwarf2sources
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: image-factory
Version: 1.0.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libreswan
Version: 4.12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -pthread -std=gnu99
Source: apertium-eo-en
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: prewikka
Version: 5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: mathcomp-analysis
Version: 0.6.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: q2cli
Version: 2022.11.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: astap
Version: 2022.12.09-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: tuba
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: wacomtablet
Version: 3.2.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: distro-info
Version: 1.7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: lomiri-system-settings
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: ddrescueview
Version: 0.4.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: khard
Version: 0.19.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: cthreadpool
Version: 0.0+git20201207.b259a6e-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: octave-sockets
Version: 1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: h5z-zfp
Version: 1.1.0+git20221021-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Package: deluged
Version: 2.0.3-4
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: dieselcheve...@hotmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
I am a recent convert from Gentoo to Debian and installed bookworm yesterday.
I installed deluged to host my large selection of torrents.
In bookworm stable, deluged uses considerably
Hi,
Le 12/01/2024 à 10:37, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
Package: megapixels
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: grave
Running megapixels from commandline on mobian trixie fails with this error
/usr/share/megapixels/config/purism,librem5r4.ini not found.
This is expected, megapixels doesn't support the
Am Di., 16. Jan. 2024 um 18:21 Uhr schrieb Julian
:
>
> > That is false, GNOME Software on Debian does depend on s-p-gtk. The
> > reason this was implemented is that the PackageKit repository
> > preferences dialog does not cover all the options needed on a Debian
> > system, and especially not
Shengjing Zhu writes:
>> go.sum:github.com/AdamKorcz/go-fuzz-headers-1
>> v0.0.0-20230618160516-e936619f9f18
>> h1:rd389Q26LMy03gG4anandGFC2LW/xvjga5GezeeaxQk=
>> go.sum:github.com/AdamKorcz/go-fuzz-headers-1
>> v0.0.0-20230618160516-e936619f9f18/go.mod
>>
On 2024-01-16 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
I've applied the patch in Git and also tried to upgrade to latest
upstream since there is a chance that other Python3.12 issues might be
fixed. Unfortunately the upgrade is all but straightforward and
I gave up finally
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "w-scan-cpp":
* Package name : w-scan-cpp
Version : 0~20231015-1
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL :
Source: libshumate
Version: 1.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-flask-httpauth
Version: 4.5.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: dqlite
Version: 1.16.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: guestfs-tools
Version: 1.52.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering
Source: scikit-fmm
Version: 2022.08.15-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: sphinxcontrib-bibtex
Version: 2.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: xeus-python
Version: 0.15.10+~0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: winff
Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: octave-zeromq
Version: 1.5.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: aiohttp-jinja2
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: click
Version: 0.5.0-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory
Source: apertium-isl-eng
Version: 0.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pygame-sdl2
Version: 8.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: octave-divand
Version: 1.1.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: octave-splines
Version: 1.3.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: libervia-pubsub
Version: 0.4.0+hg488-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sccache
Version: 0.7.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: cinnamon-control-center
Version: 5.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: svtplay-dl
Version: 3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: transgui
Version: 5.18.0+dfsg-3.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: moment-timezone.js
Version: 0.5.43+dfsg-1+2023c
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-watchgod
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: wavbreaker
Version: 0.16-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: lookatme
Version: 2.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: flask-restful
Version: 0.3.9-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: bdebstrap
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: c-evo-dh
Version: 1.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: golang-github-go-kit-kit
Version: 0.10.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: trash-cli
Version: 0.23.2.13.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl
Version: 3.002
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-en-gl
Version: 0.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: apertium-eu-en
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: gnome-settings-daemon
Version: 45.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: syncthingtray
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Control: block -1 by 1060884
Am 16.01.24 um 05:04 schrieb zhangdandan:
The swupdate source package (pull from sid) was compiled successfully on my
local loong64 rootfs environment.
But refer to other architectures, maybe we need to add additional dependency
support in d/control and d/rules.
I
Package: nagvis
Version: 1:1.9.34-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the provided nagvis-package does not work out-of-the-box. It only
provides this Error-Message in the Browser:
Error: (0) Creation of dynamic property GlobalMainCfg::$PUCACHE is deprecated
URL:
Source: flask-mongoengine
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240115 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Hi,
I am sending the proposed patch to add the exfat module to initrd:
diff --git a/backend/initramfs-tools/live.hook
b/backend/initramfs-tools/live.hook
index
ff8f4210690e21961dd5e8c3f1d7b3a5b14d4167..7c476ea6159c0664e47497f82145b6da8391
100755
--- a/backend/initramfs-tools/live.hook
+++
Am Di., 16. Jan. 2024 um 20:03 Uhr schrieb Julian
:
>
>
> > Fair point. We could maybe make it so g-s-p is only a recommended
> > dependency
>
> That is what this request is requesting. Just a change from depend to
> recommend
>
> > and modify the code so when g-s-p is not available, it
> > falls
Il 16/01/2024 20:29, Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
CMake binary for host machine is not cached
CMake binary missing from cross or native file, or env var undefined.
Trying a default CMake fallback at cmake
Did not find CMake 'cmake'
Found CMake: NO
Dependency lookup for libwacom with method 'cmake'
package release.debian.org
tags 1057179 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: mariadb
Version:
Étienne Mollier, on 2024-01-12:
> Rebecca N. Palmer, on 2023-12-14:
> > This autopkgtest, and particularly test_reconstruct_rumba, is slow enough
> > that it sometimes times out and fails. I think this is varying hardware
> > speed and not a random hang because failure seems to correlate with the
Version: 0.11
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your report.
The run function in Update.pm has been removed and merged into Enable.pm
since extrepo 0.10, which means that this bug should be resolved now.
However, I forgot to close the bug report at the time.
Doing so now.
Thanks,
--
Dear Dandan Zhang,
Could you please post that patch in the upstream mailing list
efibootguard-...@googlegroups.com .
Thanks
Quirin Gylstorff
On 1/16/24 04:28, zhangdandan wrote:
Source: efibootguard
Version: 0.15-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org
At some point, I tried to update to version 3.4.1, but got stuck with
some problems, which I don't remember. Very likely, they are fixed
upstream meanwhile. I don't have much time right now, and would
appreciate, if somebody else could (team) upload. Thanks!
Control: owner 237925 Matteo Bini
Hi Christoph, hi Robert.
I'm still going to package CDEmu, but I don't know exactly when. There
are a few things I need to better understand before I can do it, for
instance if it's fine to make as many DEB packages as the source
tarballs CDEmu is divided in.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:20:25PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 08:36:26PM +0100, наб wrote:
> > Package: lynx
> > Version: 2.9.0dev.6-3~deb11u1
> > Version: 2.9.0dev.12-1
> > Severity: normal
> ...
> > I get the same thing when I run
> > echo
> >
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo