database with disabled passwords if that's what the admin
> wants, without any requirement to modify pam_smbpass in this manner, and
> it's arguably less error-prone to do so, at which point pam_smbpass does
> what's expected without any further modifications.
Sounds l
e
> Windows and on Debian boxes.
> I hope my information makes it easier, to find the bug.
I don't think nss_wins uses winbindd on linux.
Due to the new structure of winbind, I think this is considered
deliberate, but could be worked around by making your box think it is a
PDC of it&#
h is a security advantage on platforms that include it.
Now, I don't know where debian stands on these issues, but that is my
understanding of the 'misfeature'.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer,
in the
code, so the assertion is correct. If you can't read the secrets.tdb,
there isn't much else we can do when we need that value.
For the record, the -L option was added for a *testing* case (build
farm) where we don't actually install as root, but instead use a normal
us
own
files or otherwise be visible in any way from the windows world. This
doesn't mean that they should have a valid login account (they should be
disabled: double-check that).
As we move more and more down the path of samba correctness, the issue
of accounts that exist in unix but not in the
ges prevented administrators
from joining machines to the domain.
It simply means that after you have brute-forced the root password (with
samba telling you yes/no to that stage), you can't connect to a share.
I think it remains there as a historical relic.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartl
s
trace? It seems the problem starts at nss_ldap_initgroups_dyn() and
fails in the ldap libs or nss_ldap.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
rmination (kill -9, power failure or the like), or if you have a segv
backtrace.
Otherwise, I'll just put this down to 'corrupt tdb', yes delete it.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 02:12 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:42:50PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 06:54 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > > Zeus:/var/log/samba# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd
> > > > sm
a tdb is corrupt the behaviours are undefined. It may work for a
time, and there may be normal startups and shutdowns, but it could cause
a crash or errors later.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
mba 3.0 (it was used in the
--with-ldapsam option in samba 2.2).
Where was this documented (this is at most a documentation bug,
otherwise it needs to be marked done).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
decide to put together a samba-utils
> package, please make sure that everything you put in it is both useful, and
> functional on Debian. :)
And secure. I would love an audit of backticks in that code...
I think this may be why RH doesn't ship some of this, but it's never
been
provides the session setup. (Contrasting with the cifs vfs,
which is all in-kernel).
> An appropriate fix might be for the kernel to ignore the presence of
> CAP_UNIX when uid/gid options have been passed to mount.
This is also a very sensible way to handle it, and is the only 's
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 18:39 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Yeah, on second look I see that it can be done in smbmount, and this would
> > be
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:20:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:17:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > > Yeah, on second look I see that it can be done in smbmount, and this
> > > > > would
> > >
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 05:04 -0500, Christian Perrier wrote:
> We will deal with it with the Samba Team. Thanks for reporting.
>
>
> Let's first get attention of Andrew Bartlett who follows the Debian
> BTS : Andrew, is it expected that "syslog only = 1" and "sy
is the kernel, and the correct upstream
is Steve French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the disucssion list linux-cifs-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
> > I'm just currently listening to a talk by Jerry
> > Carter about winbind
> > (Andrew Bartlett is also, probablyAndrew, I'm
> > the guy with the red
> > shirt wandering around with a laptop and a big
> > Debian logo on
> > it).and h
ing now (SAT MAY-7-2005)
> > what should smb.conf have to do with smbclient? I thought thats for the
> > server
> > only?
The smb.conf file is used extensively by both the client and server code.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samb
a big part of what Samba does, and I'm a
bit worried you can't test any of this.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
s in the kernel, not in the userspace mount utilities.
I strongly suggest moving to cifsfs, as it is more appropriate to
talking to NT based servers. (you include no information on the server
in your bug report, but I'm assuming XP).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
d username.
Issues of parsing in mount on mount.cifs can be addressed by reading the
manpage and following the suggestions.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.http://suse.de
Authentication Develo
Than I shutdown the windows 2000/XP computer.
Can you compare this behaviour against NFS? In any case, the CIFS file-
system is the better option to 2000/XP servers. smbfs is simply older
code.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba
cript
> after the printer lists have been made available, smbd still has a bug in
> not handling changes to the CUPS printer list.
I understand we now poll, btw...
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE La
ainer will at least need a
valgrind trace of the deamon crashing, to find where the double-free is.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker C
trace-children option, but not smbd's -i, the
valgrind errors will end up in the normal Samba logfiles (we redirect
stderr).
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
S
invasive to me and
> avoids enforcing users of libpmam-smbpass to install samba-common.
You also want to conflict with >> don't you?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.http://
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:34 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:16:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek scribbled:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:22:55PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > better to have it built from the samba source package?
> >
> >
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:43 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:21:37PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett scribbled:
> [snip]
> > > > I don't mind building a tdb package out of the samba source tree, but I
> > > > don't really know which tools
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:55 +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:49:47PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett scribbled:
> [snip]
> > > > and add it to the already too many patches in Samba for debian. Then
> > > > work with jra and jerry on making th
.
> maybe the problem is in ldap resolver code?
Yep, this is an nss_ldap bug, just caught by Samba's fault reporting.
> #40 0x4043b507 in _nss_ldap_getpwent_r () from /lib/libnss_ldap.so.2
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
the configure settings from compile time.
The first step here would be to develop a patch for Samba3 to produce
isolated header files (like libsmbclient has). The problem with the VFS
interfaces is that modules tend to use a wide variety of 'internal'
Samba functions, along wit
nd a tdbsam but there isn't. The output below:
BDC is simply not supported for anything other than LDAP. I'm sure we
document that trying this will lead to unexplained failures.
How do you cope with the locking and/or file replacement on the tdbs?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
mba does not, so I think this bug is still an issue.
Where is tdb being sourced from at the moment? I know tdb has gone in a
number of interesting directions, but I think the most current code is
from Samba4 (where tridge just added transactions).
Andrew Bartlett
-
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 19:09 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 04:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 11:58:27AM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> > > > this pr
ed some more detail on. Why are you doing this? Is
the server in any way contacting itself? Is this not a case of 'it
hurts! Well stop doing it!'?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc.
HUTDOWN", like it does for ABORTSHUTDOWN.
> The following patch fixes this.
To be much use, patches for docs need to be against the XML source.
Regardless, I've fixed the xml in samba.org's SVN
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.o
On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 08:35 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> forwarded 402392 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4292
> thanks
Fixed in Samba SVN
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
grind's output into the logs when the memory-chewing
smbd is killed could be useful. There is also an smbcontrol command
'pool-usage' that, if the process is still responsive, could list where
the memory is being used.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 12:54 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 20:46 -0500, Jamie ffolliott wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I'll work on getting a valgrind log during off-hours and get back to you.
> >
> > For now I've got some pool-u
details about your
setup? What is "IUSR_UNIIPER"?
Given this output, I'm presuming we have a call to talloc_getpwnam()
that is not talloc_free()'ing the result.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication
lloc_free()'ing the result.
> >
> > Actually, the call would be getpwnam_alloc(). Anyway, can I
> > get some more context around that output? I'm interested in
> > the parent information, and any other details you can give me.
>
> If there's
of the talloc
dump. How big was the process we did the talloc pool dump of? (because
600k shouldn't kill a server).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
s
Jamie's problem however. (I just took a pot shot at some likely
suspects).
Thoughts?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
this time).
http://download.samba.org/ftp/unpacked/lorikeet/trunk/mod_ntlm_winbind/
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College
ce we also use the SMB
> database to authenticate, PAM broke.
>
> I suggest making samba-common conflict with libpam-smbpass <<
> 3.0.10-1, or to introduce versioned dependencies between the two
> packages.
These packages should be in lock-step, as should all samba tar
ce we also use the SMB
> database to authenticate, PAM broke.
>
> I suggest making samba-common conflict with libpam-smbpass <<
> 3.0.10-1, or to introduce versioned dependencies between the two
> packages.
These packages should be in lock-step, as should all samba tar
hare the same locking
databases.
Administrators constructing such a setup would need to fully understand
the consequences - making it automagic would seem a bad idea in this
case.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication
got smb length of 35
> size=35
> and so on..
>
> Tested building mplayer with smbclient support. When I try to
> watch something on an smb://foo/bar I get tons of debug in
> stdout. The slowdown is significant.
This is controlled by your Samba debug level, just as for smb
On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 03:46 +0100, David Gerber wrote:
> On Thursday 24 February 2005 00:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > This is controlled by your Samba debug level, just as for smbclient.
>
> Right, I get:
>
> which suggests the default debug level is not 0, but:
ccur against windows servers too?
A network capture should show one way or the other.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http:
ile
> Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
Frankly, this (reopening logfiles every time we share files from a
different service) is never going to happen.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Tea
of implementing the documented
> syntax -- only when the approved syntax changes.
Our list code allows these separators.
> If you can point me to some resource that said to use the comma, then I'll
> happily implement that check.
I'm pretty sure it has been standard s
rfaces, but that there are none, might be acceptable.
That said, a system that can't even report that the loopback device
exists is a pretty poor system...
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 11:30 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On 16 January 2014 14:03, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Can we get this patch into the Heimdal package, so we can fix
> that side
>
> of bug #732342?
>
> Once I know the version
ned 4.0 release, and it's in our
debian/TODO list as:
Decide if we care about findsmb, and if so patch upstream to restore it
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT ht
you examine logfiles to show that this was the case? Samba should
print it's version in the logs when starting up.
We changed the default passdb backend long before 3.6.
Is there as passdb.tdb anywhere else on your system?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
s.
For example, a significant number of issues came about as folks tried to
divine if a particular TDB was short, medium or long-term, when no such
separation existed in the code.
We (upstream) have gone to significant effort to integrate the FHS
changes that have been proposed via Debian, I can
similar issues before, including a patch posted to the list just last
week.
Can someone post the cups-config --libs and --ldflags output on a
affected system?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 12:20 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:45:22PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Almost certainly this is due to the output of cups-config. We have had
> > similar issues before, including a patch posted to the li
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 12:44 +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:32:14PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > cups-config --libs:
> > > -lcups -Wl,-z,relro -lgssapi_krb5 -lkrb5 -lk5crypto -lcom_err -lgnutls
> > > -l
this is in the wrong
place. Perhaps we need to get this into our CFLAGS. Forced into this
header, we just ensure the particular .c file this is included in uses
64-bit file handles, but not the other C files that link to that in the
binary using our library. It just pushes the problem a
On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 08:12 -0500, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:13:39PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 03:34 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> > >
>
like it belongs
in ldflags, it also shows all the cups dependencies. We don't need
these directly, the linker will handle these in-directly, and Samba now
ignores --libs for this reason.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba
ter errors out again):
The issue here is not wrong file lists, but missing dependencies. When
xsltproc and the docbook xslt styles are found (for example), swat.1
will generate, and must be removed (as we don't ship swat).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
oss hack, primarily done to support openchange, and a great deal
of work was spent undoing that split. Samba 4.0.0beta2 is also very,
very old now, and is considered long-deprecated by upstream. You have
found here one of the many reasons you should not run that code in
producti
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 22:00 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:37:49PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > Ok. I think we need to undo this /var/lib/samba/private nonsense. It is
> > > a
> > > pointless and imperfect migratio
On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 00:35 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 10:00:12PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:37:49PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > Ok. I think we need to undo this /var/lib/samba/pr
On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 10:22 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:34:25AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > That'll also cause some confusion though, as those files will be in
> > > sysstatedir on debian but in privatedir on o
s stack trace shows signs of stack corruption.
> "0x" and "0x0008" are not valid addresses to
> appear in a backtrace.
>
> You may have better luck debugging by running under valgrind, which can
> often detect stack corruption errors at
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > > symbols from
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/l
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:29 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> >
> > > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...
here for both heimdal and samba. I can
> submit debug backtraces if anyone is interested.
Thanks for looking into this. I was coming to exactly the same
conclusion.
For upstream, I'll patch Samba, can you submit the patch to Heimdal
(feel free to CC me)?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
A
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:12 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:04 -0600, Jeff Clark wrote:
> > Samba needs the hdb plugin updated to support hdb version 8.
> >
> >
> >
> > Heimdal needs the hdb callback function patched because even
r this pushed, and get the
matching Heimdal patch in.
Brian,
This bug needs a patch to Heimdal as well as to Samba. I'll post you
the patch once I've tested it, and then I guess we need to work on a
stricter version dep here to make sure this all keeps in sync.
Andrew Bartle
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 02:32 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 18:04 -0600, Jeff Clark wrote:
> > No problem. Will send it over in a few hours.
>
> With all the false starts on this, I've sat on the patches until I can
> test it with the developer
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:58 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 01:54:32PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > > > Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhdb.so.9...Reading
> > > > symbols from
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/l
think?
This is an incorrect understanding, and I'll attempt to further clarify
that page to make that more clear.
The OpenLDAP backend to our classic domain controller (as found in Samba
3.x) remains fully supported. The new feature of our AD DC is a very
different beast.
Andrew Ba
inced that the problem in the original
> submission of this bug was caused by such a race condition. That case should
> be fixed by the earlier changes.
Thank you so much for you diligent attention to this difficult problem.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletth
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 12:32 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Some more improvements to this, pending in the 4.1 branch:
>
> * Moved the VFS modules to a separate package (samba-vfs-modules),
>which is recommended by 'samba'.
> * Moved the service and process_model modules to the 'samba'
>
On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 20:54 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 08:22:41AM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-11-17 at 12:32 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > Some more improvements to this, pending in the 4.1 branch:
> > >
> >
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 08:51 +0200, Brian Jonnes wrote:
> Latest security patch does not include this. Shall I post to security team?
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 21:15 +0200, Brian Jonnes wrote:
> >> Package: winbi
hing that upstream ought
> to do.
>
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8449
If someone would like to try the attached patch and confirm I've not
broken anything (ie test all the auth/acct/password steps), that would
be most helpful.
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
27;s policy
of fixes only, if that was the case and is no longer the case, that's
unfortunate. A lot of important fixes made it into Samba after 3.6.6.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://
User).
I recently fixed this in git master with
95e0d759ac7584d8e27240f11a4b51077b61929c
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 23:16 -0400, Brian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > If someone would like to try the attached patch and confirm I've not
> > broken anything (ie test all the auth/acct/password steps), that would
to list it.
The issue I have with the patch is that it introduces a non-standard
3-argument main, and I still remain spooked by what libbsd does inside
it's setproctitle.
I would actually prefer we stopped looking for setproctitle in libbsd.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://s
eeded.
The issue is have been that you had an older memberof in the load path,
and it failed to load against the newer ldb. We don't use the memberof
module from sssd.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, S
l be uploaded when they're ready, and not before; a bug report requesting
> > an upload is redundant.
> I think this was meant the other way around; Andrew's NMU (which was uploaded)
> didn't end up in the Git repository.
I can't find the details right now, but I did s
g.nmbd had this,
>
> [2013/04/11 19:15:09, 3]
> nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:2068(wins_process_name_query_request)
> wins_process_name_query: name query for name HOST.EXAMPLE.NE<20>
> returning DNS fail.
Your wins server is acting as a dns proxy, and the name was truncated at
the m
I select them to navigate to.
What character set are the filenames in and what is 'unix charset' set
to?
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
--
To UNSU
r affect on the usability of the package.
Please report upstream. We may somehow be able to obtain the CSRF token
and store it in memory before we become the non-privileged user.
Just to be sure, are you running SWAT as root, from xinetd?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
ver the parameter
> "netbios name = samba-%h" for instance has the expected result.
The netbios name is the hostname by default.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.
is a much less efficient way to connect to
the DC, once per client connection.
This issue has already been noticed upstream, at
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9854 with a patch.
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samb
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 09:41 +1200, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 23:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On May 6, 2013 11:11:34 PM you wrote:
> >
> > > Updated my sid box on Sunday after the post-release floodgates opened
> > > and Samba started
e we use waf in Debian, the waf code has been included
as source).
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartletthttp://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...
with a lot of work, so any assistance you can give would be
most welcome, it is series and isn't a trivial issue to fix.
Certainly fixing it in unstable seems unlikely except for migration of
the soon to be experimental package from samba_4.0, so that is where the
effort needs to be made.
Th
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 10:33 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > dbwrap*.so is now in samba-common-bin. The issue is that this almost
> > certainly depends on the credentials library, so we may need yet another
> > library package,
on, so this is specific command set is fairly pointless now.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Catalyst IT http://catalyst.net.nz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
d to fix the issue, and was (if I
recall correctly) in the samba4 experimental packages before we updated
to a modern version of Samba including the fix upstream.
That said, I don't propose we do anything other than migrate samba4 in
from experimental to fix this.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
