Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: serious
Justification: Won't uninstall cleanly
It hangs on this line of the postrm script:
my $ret = purge();
I can get it to work by deleting this line. Perhaps this is because a
debconf routine is being called after stop has been
Sven Luther wrote:
It would be great if you could confirm the exact version of those two
packages, and could provide us some log of what is happening, as this bug
report doesn't seem to be very informative.
For me, i have provided information in bug #344767, as i explained in
the previous
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
I haven't tested 2.6.15 because it isn't available in my mirror yet. But
the Nathanael posts tell us that the problem is still present in the
latest kernel.
As soon as it will be available on the mirror i use, i'll test 2.6.15.
Ok, 2.6.15 is arrived.
I've tryed
Sven Luther wrote:
Ok, 2.6.15 is arrived.
I've tryed to install linux-image-2.6.15-1-486 (version 2.6.15-1), then
to purge it and the operation failed. But now, it doesn't hang as stated
in the bug reports, but fails with an error:
Indeed, this is a grub RC bug, which need to fix their
Paulo Marcel Coelho Aragao wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.14-2-686
Version: 2.6.14-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Right after I upgraded linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 to 2.6.14-5 and rebooted, boot
is interrupted with repeated messages:
/bin/cat:
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
To help pin down the cause, could you post the output of:
uname -a
dpkg -l yaird
yaird -v -o crap.img 2.6.14-2-686
yaird -v -o crap.img 2.6.14-5-686
(assuming these are the last kernel that boots and the first that works)
To avoid
Thanks to the clear Erik's step by step guide, i've applayed his patch
and here is my results.
Erik van Konijnenburg wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:52:34AM +0100, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Step by step:
[...]
** Comment out any work-arounds (MODULE ide-generic) you may have made
Package: openoffice.org-help-it
Version: 2.0.0-3
As i reported on debian-office mailing list, in a message of the 19
december 2005, this package belongs to contrib but, after installation,
the Debian package system reports that it belongs to main.
During my experiments that happened only to
Package: linux-image-2.6-386
Version: 2.6.14-6
Trying to purge that package you get the following situation (purge
launched from aptitude):
--
(Reading database ... 80461 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing linux-image-2.6-386 ...
Removing
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6-386
Version: 2.6.14-6
Same with linux-image-2.6-386 version 2.6.14-7: if i try to install also
the 386 image (side by side to the main linux-image-2.6-686), then i try
to remove it, the removal procedure hangs as described in the initial
Carl Fink wrote:
Removing the second SODIMM from the laptop had no effect, but
removing the first (and swapping the second into slot #1) seems to have
stopped the freezes, at least on ten minutes of work. So maybe a
combination of kernel and hardware problems?
Since you suspect ram problems,
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.16-2-486 (--purge):
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 128
Errors were encountered while processing:
linux-image-2.6.16-2-486
I think that this bug could be merged with #395359, #390038, #388696.
Christopher Desjardins wrote:
I've noticed that my IPod also experiences this and after I've
eventually ejected it the device stills gives the impression that it is
communicating with my computer (i.e. it says do not remove device on the
screen of the IPod). I know that at least Ubuntu and
Matthew Darwin wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686
Version: 2.6.16-18
Severity: normal
% dpkg --purge linux-image-2.6.16-2-686
(Reading database ... 18837 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 ...
Purging configuration files for
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
On my Debian Sid, i have learned that actually i can't trust on the
unmount volume function of Nautilus: when the volume icon disappear, i
can't trust that it is really unmounted, since many times i have
verified that a mount command reports that it is *not* mounted yet
I can confirm Paul's analysis (great work Paul!).
Probably Darren cannot reproduce the bug because he have a .gxine
directory in his home. In fact if i create an empty one, and i start
gxine, a socket file appear inside it and, more important, now gxine
works properly.
Let's wait for the
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
In May i've sent the following mail to debian-gtk-gnome to signal this
problem but since nothing happened so far, i file a bug:
-
Since some days i've noted (updated Debian Sid) that when i right-click
on a usb
Package: gnome
Version: 1:2.22.2~4
Severity: minor
Debian/Sid user.
Since the Lenny release is approacing, i think it'll be useful to
describe a problem i've seen for a long time.
For me it's always reproducible:
- login with gdm;
- *IMPORTANT*: do nothing (ie not start any application);
-
Neil Williams wrote:
Have you disabled dbus notifications? The point at which the icon
disappears is not the point at which the drive is safe to remove. DBus
normally raises a notification window Data is being written to the
device followed by Device is now safe to remove.
Mmh, i feel you are
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 3.4-1
Severity: minor
The modprobe command shows a -b option not documented in the man page.
Regards.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92e
Severity: minor
Today i've changed update_initramfs variable from yes to all.
The update-initramfs scripts seems to look at the contents of the
directory /var/lib/initramfs-tools/ to know for what image to update
(it contain MD5 files, one for every
in my system.
Regards.
Cesare Leonardi.
[Default]
0,id=11c0a80a0100012120132050027750012
0,RestartStyleHint=2
0,Priority=40
0,Program=nautilus
0,CurrentDirectory=/home/cesare
0,CloneCommand=nautilus --sm-config-prefix /nautilus-R4FJdT/
0,RestartCommand=nautilus --sm-config-prefix /nautilus
Package: pdnsd
Version: 1.2.6-par-7
I've installed this package on a Debian Lenny machine that show an error
on boot:
--
Starting pdnsdError in config file (line 13): Failed to get IP address
of eth2: No such device
failed!
--
At line 13 of /etc/pdnsd.conf,
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-6
Frequency scaling need the proper cpufreq module to be loaded.
The /etc/init.d/loadcpufreq script should take care of this kernel
loading process, but it exits immediately, doing nothing, if
/etc/default/loadcpufreq doesn't contain this:
ENABLE=true
So if
Robert Millan wrote:
I've recently upgraded my hardware (motherboard + cpu + ram) and am now
getting Linux crashes in a variety of situations. I've detected them
when any of the following conditions are met:
- When starting a second X session.
- When time goes backwards (e.g. due to
Robert Millan wrote:
Well, since X is a userland process, I wouldn't expect it to be able to
crash the kernel, even if it plays with /dev/agpgart in a bad way. It
can even be a security issue.
I'm not a X expert but the server contains many drivers that interact
with the graphics hardware, i
Package: falselogin
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi falselogin maintainer/developer.
I've found your program useful but i needed a way to specify the wait
parameter for the login shell. Since it isn't possible to specify any
parameter in the /etc/passwd file, i've patched falselogin
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.7-1
Debian Sid user.
I prefer aptitude to *always* asks me if i want to install the packages
just downloaded. In the latest version the option dialog is changed
(reverting the behaviour above to When an error occours) and now i
cannot make the following options
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-5
Since cpufrequtils seems to be a subset of cpufreqd, and of each of them
main function's is to set the cpufreq governor that a cpu have to use
(and its options), shouldn't they conflict with each other?
As now the package's description is not very clear
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-5
Reading from the description of the package seems that it only install
two utilities that one has to invoke manually to make something. But
this package is a lot more active than this: in fact it starts the
ondemand cpufreq governor and creates an init
Mattia Dongili wrote:
Since cpufrequtils seems to be a subset of cpufreqd, and of each of them
main function's is to set the cpufreq governor that a cpu have to use (and
its options), shouldn't they conflict with each other?
no, cpufreqd does it dynamically, cpufrequtils statically and also
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-5
Severity: wishlist
This package uses this two boot scripts:
/etc/init.d/cpufrequtils
/etc/init.d/loadcpufreq
Reading their contents, i've learned that they can use these two
configuration files:
/etc/default/cpufrequtils
/etc/default/loadcpufreq
I've
Package: gnome-volume-manager
Version: 2.17.0-2
In May i've sent the following mail to debian-gtk-gnome to signal this
problem but since nothing happened so far, i file a bug:
-
Since some days i've noted (updated Debian Sid) that when
Mattia Dongili wrote:
no, maybe cpufreqd should start after cpufrequtils. Or simply
cpufrequtils start earlier to avoid also breaking other policy deamons.
Seems a sensible solution.
installed. Or should be a mechanism to make cpufrequtils to do nothing on
startup (a variable on
Package: gxine
Version: 0.5.902-2
Since more than a month (i don't remember from what gxine version) i
have an annoying problem opening multimedia files (mp3, ogg, avi, seems
everything).
Try this (always reproducible):
1) open an mp3 (or something else) double-clicking on it;
2) open
Darren Salt wrote:
Works properly here.
I suspected that... In fact it's strange that i haven't found no other
with the same problem! :-(
Have you by any chance told your filer to use gxine -n?
In my initial post i haven't say that i use gnome from unstable (now not
fully 2.22;
Marco d'Itri wrote:
reassign 361741 initramfs-tools
thanks
Sorry, i don't know udev in details, but i don't understand why you have
reassigned this bug to initramfs-tools.
The aptitude's log of that day is the following:
Before reading your message i've tryed to follow the script launched
inside initramfs and i suspected that something went wrong in line 39 of
the script /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local:
eval eval $(fstype ${ROOT})
maximilian attems wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Cesare Leonardi wrote
maximilian attems wrote:
you need to regenerate your initramfs image:
update-initramfs -u
probably
update-initramfs -t -u
and reboot with it, please tell which messages you still see afterwards.
also be warned that current udev/initramfs-tools seems to forget about
ide-generic if you need
I confirm that on my system the bug seems fixed.
I have upgraded to udev 0.084-5 and now my system has returned to boot
without error and without slowness.
Thank you.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
The frequency of how often this happens varies: sometimes, it's every
single boot until I remove the laptop battery; at other times, it's only
about one boot out of every five. It seems to be related to IRQ problems
(booting the laptop without its battery, and
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.59
Severity: serious
Some minutes ago i have run aptitude to update my Debian Sid and the
installation of the latest kernel has failed with the following messages:
Setting up
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Yep, IPv6 support in thttpd is somewhat borked, upstream =2.25 does fix
it..
Ok.
But just to be more precise (my previous mail could be confusing in
that), i don't use any IPv6 address. My network is IPv4.
Since my knowledge of IPv6 are rather low, i don't know it is
Today i have fallen in the these bug caused by zeroconf an i want to
contribute with information to confirm them and hoping to be useful to
solve them.
Also for me zeroconf was not installed on my choice but as a recommended
package. This package was present on my system since some week but
Since now seems to be clear that this not a ifupdown bug, i think it can
be closed.
Regards.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry to inform you that for me the problem is still present.
I have seen no changes with udev 0.084-4.
Regards.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juan Piñeros wrote:
I do not find any logical explanation. No strange message in syslog, we used
normal programs (konqueror, thunderbird, oowriter) when sudenly when try to
save a file or read mail, an error appears just saying that the directories
did not exist any more.
In the past i had a
Juan Piñeros wrote:
In machine1 hdparm is not currently installed, but it was 1 year ago when the
machine1 had woody installed. I suppose hdparm does not change anything to
the disk itself but only to the ide modules of the kernel?
Hdparm is a powerful tool that can activate/deactivate some
to go the sea. ;-)
Have someone any suggestion?
Regards.
Cesare.
---
-[ MESSAGE 2 ]-
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
As you can see the modules to mount my ATA (not sata) drive are in
place. I have tryed to mount root manually:
mount /dev/hda2 /
but it fails.
I wrote
Leena Romppainen wrote:
Machine: Sony Vaio SGN-S5HP
Processor: Intel Pentium M 740 1.73 GHz
Memory: 512 MB
[...]
Touchpad is extremely slow even when settings have been put to the
fastest possible (touchpad is fine in Windows XP and Ubuntu (breezy
5.10), but makes the Debian fairly
Hi Otavio.
Recently i've talked with someone else that cannot purge 2.6.14, as
described in #344767.
I know that now it is solved for 2.6.15, but for people that still use
2.6.14 or have used it, the problem of purging it completely still
exist. For example on my machine, the various kernel
Package: thttpd
Version: 2.23beta1-4
Today i've installed thttpd to try it, and one of the first thing i've
done is:
dpkg-reconfigure -p low thttpd
Then it immediately write this error:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/thttpd.config: line 100: [: too many arguments
and the thttpd.config script start to
I don't the status of the bug or if someone has already replied, since
bugs.debian.org seems down now.
Ray Kohler wrote:
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8
Version: 2.6.16-14
Severity: normal
After installing this kernel upgrade, my sound no longer works. It is a
builtin board which uses
I confirm this bug.
I saw the error message during the upgrade from 0.97-9 to 0.97-9.1 but
also during the previous upgrade from 0.97-7.1 to 0.97-9.
I see it two times during the upgrade phase (hand written):
Preparing to replace grub-doc 0.97-9 (using
.../grub-doc_0.97-9.1_all.deb)...
Benjamin A. Okopnik wrote:
Since I didn't get copied on this reply (I just saw it after searching
the BTS), I didn't get a chance to follow up to it earlier. I'd
appreciate being CCd in the future, thanks.
Sorry, was my mistake.
This machine initially came with Wind0ws, and I used it that
I think that this bug can be merged with #390038 and #388696: they are
about the same issue.
And to add information to these bug reports, i have verified that also
the 2.6.18 series has the same problem (tryed to purge
linux-image-2.6.18-1-486 version 2.6.18-3):
-
(Reading
Package: amule
Version: 2.2.4-1+b1
Severity: normal
Same for me.
The application stopped working after the upgrade from 2.2.4-1 to
2.2.4-1+b1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux
Hoping to help, i attach the strace output.
Amule is a multithreaded application, so that can mean nothing, but the
last instruction executed seems the same as Alex: an open-read-close on
/dev/urandom.
Regards.
Cesare.
execve(/usr/bin/amule, [/usr/bin/amule], [/* 31 vars */]) = 0
brk(0)
In version 2.02.53-1 i don't see the message anymore.
To me the bug is fixed and can be closed.
Thank you all.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 10/25/2010 07:52 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
The strange is that nobody else seems to have reported a similar
problem, so now i've decided for another test: i've downgraded hdparm to
9.27-2.1 and i'll test it for about a month. I'll report here if the
errors happen the same (and so something
I just upgraded to the latest lenny perdition package. The upgrade resulted in
the /etc/perdition/popmap.*.db files being removed and not regenerated.
I confirm this too.
Today i upgraded from 1.17.1-2 to 1.17.1-2+lenny2 and after a reboot for
a kernel upgrade, some user started complaining
On 12/27/2010 09:36 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Grub command lines are identical except that lapic hpet=force in
normal boot is substituted by single in recovery mode.
I've found that if i remove lapic from the command line, then the NMI
error appears. And in fact that paramter it's
On 01/02/2011 10:44 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Then add +1 to what Michael Biebl already asked: why that message should
be showed?
Because the watchdog feature was enabled at compile-time and you
presumably want it to work. If you add 'nowatchdog' to the kernel
parameters then the kernel will
On 01/02/2011 11:51 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Yes, I see, it doesn't say that this is a fatal error for watchdog
initialisation.
I've seen just now the patch (v1 and v2) you sent upstream: thank you
very much for improving the error message and the documentation.
Very very appreciated.
On 12/02/2011 03:22, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
Kernel version (/proc/version):
Linux version 2.6.37-0.dmz.7-liquorix-amd64 (Debian 2.6.37-7)
(dame...@gmail.com) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-10) ) #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT
Mon Jan 31 02:37:44 CST 2011
If were you, i would try with a standard Debian
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.98.7
Severity: normal
Every time i boot in recovery mode, i see this message:
-
Loading Linux 2.6.37-rc5-686 ...
Loading initial ramdisk ...
[0.020165] NMI watchdog failed to create perf event on cpu0: ffa1
Loading, please wait...
resume: libgcrypt
On 12/27/2010 09:48 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
This is not an initramfs-tools issue. Re-assigning to linux-2.6 and
leaving it to the kernel maintainers how to proceed with this issue
Ah, thanks! In fact i were not sure at what package address this bug.
(see #599368 for similar issue).
On 12/27/2010 10:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
In a default GRUB configuration, kernel logging to the console is
limited using the 'quiet' parameter, except in recovery mode.
I use quiet in recovery mode too.
Do you mean that when i use the single parameter, quiet is less quiet?
Cesare.
--
On 13/01/2011 19:31, Yan Morin wrote:
VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE
Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01)
Hi Yan.
Even if your system crash as the one from the original reporter, you
both have very very
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
These days i had problems with my adsl so i had to use a 56kbps pccard
modem i keep as backup.
It has always worked in the past years with Linux, but with this kernel
version it prints on the console what reported in
Package: gdm3
Version: 2.30.5-6
Severity: normal
I have a similiar problem: the difference is that for me the brightness
is set to its maximum value.
I can always see these brightness changes when gdm3 starts (then after
login Gnome restore brightness back) and when i use the Gnome switch
user
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.37-1~experimental.1
Severity: normal
I've took the liberty to CC Mattia Dongili as an expert of the
sony-laptop module: maybe he could have an opinion.
With this kernel and rc7, but not with .36 and previous version, the LCD
brightness of my Sony laptop is raised
M. Dietrich wrote:
my system had serious filesystem corruption with several -bigmem
kernel in the past (from 2.6.28 to 2.6.32).
Does this mean that with normal 686 or 486 kernel the corruption doesn't
happen?
However many years ago i've experienced frequent filesystem corruption
but i
M. Dietrich wrote:
Does this mean that with normal 686 or 486 kernel the corruption
doesn't happen?
yes.
So could be a kernel bug. Or the bigmem kernel trigger the problem early
or frequently.
Have you already searched through internet if someone had hit your
problem? Because i suspect
On 18/05/2010 16:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 18 May 2010 14:22:58 +
with message-ide1oenhc-0002ga...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#572618: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #572618,
regarding libata missing workaround for
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: normal
I will be verbose mainly to help the kernel team, because i suspect
this problem will arise for others during this libata transition.
Dear maintainter, this bug has documentation purposes: treat it as you
like. It isn't really
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: normal
Due to bug #574795 i was forced to add libata.ignore_hpa=1 on boot.
Now during the boot phase i see several of the following string
appearing asyncronously:
options libata ignore_hpa=1
I see many of them during the initramfs phase, two or
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-10
Severity: normal
Sorry, i don't know why reportbug set this package name even if i run:
reportbug linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
In bug #574795 i've corrected it by hand, but here i have forgotten.
Package is linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Due to bug #574795 i was forced to add libata.ignore_hpa=1 on boot.
Now during the boot phase i see several of the following string
appearing asyncronously:
options libata ignore_hpa=1
Do you mean that this exact line is printed to the screen? This is very
strange!
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#574584: Spurious libata message on boot
It has been closed by Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it.
Thank you for bug resolution.
Just a note: the spurious messages during the boot phase happens both
inside the initramfs and in the normal boot.
Until the next
Package: ntp
Version: 1:4.2.6+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Reading this bug report i honestly haven't understood the cause of the
messages and the related reply.
I would only add that after purging and reinstalling the package, the
messages seems gone.
Cesare.
-- System Information:
Debian
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Try running:
grep 'options libata' /etc/modprobe.conf /etc/modprobe.d
That should of course be:
grep -r 'options libata' /etc/modprobe.conf /etc/modprobe.d
Hi Ben!
That command gives no results:
tommaso ~# grep -r 'options libata' /etc/modprobe.conf
grep:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Can you run 'strace -o modprobe.strace modprobe foo' and then send the
modprobe.strace file?
Attached what you requested.
Don't know why when processing /proc/cmdline, modprobe do a write().
Cesare.
execve(/sbin/modprobe, [modprobe, foo], [/* 18 vars */]) = 0
brk(0)
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-11
Severity: normal
While installing 2.6.32-11 aptitude shows these train of messages:
(1)
-
Preconfiguring packages ...
debconf: Unknown template field '_description', in stanza #1 of
/tmp/linux-image-2.6.32-4-686.template.38292
maximilian attems wrote:
known, next time we will spam again with debconf ;)
Astonishing! You replied in less than 4 minutes from my sending.
Perhaps you are not human!? ;-)
fixed in repo will be uploaded soonest, waiting for HPA libata fix.
Many thanks.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 09/04/2010 08:00 PM, Soenke wrote:
the recent update of linux-image-2.6.32 to 2.6.32-21 disables KMS for
i8xx chipsets. This causes the xorg-video-intel driver to hang on X
startup on my system.
Yes, the situation for your i855 and previous intel chipset is in a bad
shape.
For example
On 09/04/2010 10:15 PM, Edward Allcutt wrote:
By locks up I mean:
* Screen blanks
* Unresponsive to network
* Unresponsive to sysrq
* No disk activity
* No logs written to disk after that point in time
I have xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.12.0+legacy1-1 installed. Before rebooting
On 09/05/2010 02:35 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
Kernel-team: to me these two bugs could be merged.
Didn't see Julien have already merged them, sorry.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On 09/07/2010 02:27 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 02:25:25PM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
It's both a kernel and a xserver-xorg-video-intel problem, but more the
latter. The kernel team is probably waiting to know if KMS should be
enabled or not for these chipsets
On 09/11/2010 06:24 PM, Robert Scott wrote:
Blacklisting the 855GM from KMS in 2.6.32-21 to fix bugs like 582105
seems to be causing my system to hard lock when X starts up. Magic
sysrq key does nothing, and of course the 855GM being totally
blacklisted means modeset=1 is powerless.
Hi Robert,
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.12.0+legacy1-1
Severity: normal
I cc the kernel team, since i believe it is something that relates to
them also.
I have the same problem as reported by Kamen: when GDM try to start, the
screen goes black and the CPU fan starts to go at full speed (as
On 08/27/2010 06:25 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Please test 2.6.32-21 which is now in unstable. This disables KMS for
the 855 chipset, which may fix this.
I Ben, for me the KMS disabling was a big trouble, as i explain in #594623.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08/27/2010 11:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Does the legacy driver work with UMS at all (on a different kernel,
e.g.)?
I've now tried to downgrade the .32 kernel to 2.6.32-20 and rebooting
passing i915.modeset=0 to the kernel and without the file
/etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf (which
Kamen Naydenov wrote:
I've installed
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20100813T030028Z/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686_2.6.32-20_i386.deb
and X works
Works because in this configuration you are using KMS. But i suppose
that if you disable KMS by passing i915.modeset=1
On 08/29/2010 05:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
There are i386 packages at
http://people.debian.org/~jcristau/intel-shadow/ which work for me
on minimal testing.
Hi Julien.
As long as you provide .deb packages, i can test whatever you want! ;-)
Here is my results.
Now i'm writing with:
- i855
For Chris Wilson: you can follow this bug history here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594623
On 08/29/2010 05:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Although it looks like they crash the X server in dri2 code when I run
glxinfo, so I put xserver packages with a fix for that crash at
On 08/28/2010 02:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Could you guys test the driver pointed at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/intel-gfx/2010-August/007910.html?
(probably with the 2.6.32-20 kernel)
Situation summary:
- the latest intel drivers and the latest kernel kms blacklisting cause
On 09/14/2010 11:18 PM, Michal Čihař wrote:
first I have to say there seem to be similar bugs reported (eg.
#550701), but I believe the cause here is different.
Are you sure #550701? It talks about a package called tmux...
The problem is that mouse cursor is not working in X with 2.6.35
On 10/30/2010 03:15 PM, wzabo...@elektron.elka.pw.edu.pl wrote:
Yes, it was a kernel configuration related bug (it was submitted by
someone alse as bug 601558)
The problem id that when KMS is switched on (at least in
Intel chipsets) the support for framebuffer console must be also
switched on.
On 10/30/2010 08:43 PM, Oliver Sander wrote:
I will follow Cesare Leonardis suggestion in the 600802 thread and
try the kernel and x driver from experimental.
Yes, my reply was for #601558, not for #600802.
Thank you Oliver for noticing my error.
Cesare.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
