0x162e in ?? ()
#4 0xb3d8 in ?? ()
#5 0x in ?? ()
---
The secrets.tdb file has permissions 600, but the smbpasswd help text
implies the -L option can be used by non-root users?
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT
On 09/01/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:30:44PM +, George B. wrote:
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.20b-4
Severity: normal
I run the 'smbpasswd -L' to see what it did and I got a segfault. The
panic email asked me to submit a report, so here
(but also PM related) then it all goes wrong after a few weeks
running. :-(
I will be happy to privide more specific information, if you tell me
how to get it. I don't really know much about hardware/kernel debugging.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686
,
that displayed similar symptoms. Thinking the disk was dying I swapped
it, only to have the problem come back. (The 3.5 drive is being
happily used by my brother now, with no problems whatsoever.)
Also, 3 out of 3 is a bit high failure rate...
George B.
On 27/10/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that does sound like fair resoning, though I should
say that almost always these kind of errors show up faulty hardware.
In this case, its probably a bug.
Don't get me wrong, I think may well be faulty hardware, but a general
fault rather than
On 01/11/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any chance that #336103 is related to this?
http://bugs.debian.org/336103
Hmm, don't think so. In my case I had no trouble turning DMA on (in
fact, I disabled it yesterday with hdparm just to see if it would make
any difference - it will
P.S. I could try unloading the ide-generic module etc. if you think
that's a good idea.
at
0x40001000
FatalError re-entered, aborting
lockup
---
There two reports may be related:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1467
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327507
HTH,
George B.
-- Package-specific info:
VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
:00:01.0 VGA compatible
will.
HTH
George B.
Package: ndiswrapper-utils
Version: 1.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #326471
Hello,
I've bumped severity to grave as this missing dependency renders
ndiswrapper-utils uninstallable.
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable
On 12/11/05, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but it's not uninstallable. You must build ndiswrapper-modules*
from the source package, and install ndiswrapper-utils* and
ndiswrapper-modules* in parallel. Alternatively, if the kernel team
ever gets around to doing their module
I think I finally fixed the problem by installing the apmd package. :-\
The problem was, I am guessing, that the hard drive went to sleep at
some random time (despite it being explicitly told not to in the BIOS)
and regardless of the disk activity (so even my 15 min dd cronjob did
not fix it) and
] SS:ESP 0068:ee997ec0
---
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1
On 14/09/06, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blaeh, please try to reproduce with current trunk:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
Any one in particular (2.6.17 or the 2.6.18 RC builds)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: mailscanner
Version: 4.51.5-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
Just received a message with a mangled spamassassin report
attached.
From message source:
---
-snip-
X-Scruffy-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=18.361,
required 6, autolearn=spam, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.48,
Package: console-common
Version: 0.7.64
Severity: normal
Hello,
I got the following (non-fatal) error when upgrading:
---
Preparing to replace console-common 0.7.62 (using
.../console-common_0.7.64_all.deb) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 63: [: -eq: unary operator expected
Package: exim4-daemon-light
Version: 4.63-3
Severity: normal
Hello,
For some reason, sender verification does not seem to work on my Etch
Exim4 server. I have 2 Sarge servers with nearly identical
configurations that have sender verification working just fine.
I attach the config.autogenerated
Package: exim4-daemon-light
Version: 4.63-3
Followup-For: Bug #388460
Oops, this time attach the config file.
#
# WARNING WARNING WARNING
# WARNING WARNING WARNING
# WARNING WARNING WARNING
# WARNING WARNING WARNING
# WARNING WARNING WARNING
# This file is generated dynamically from the
On 20/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:26:39PM +0100, George B. wrote:
I attach the config.autogenerated file for the problem server.
I do not see the attachment.
Yeah I noticed, sorry. I posted a followup, but BTS took some time to accept.
I have set
On 20/09/06, Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The interesting bit is this one:
[...]
check !verify = sender
Verifying [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
dsaodpojdopj.com in ! +local_domains? yes (end of list)
R: smarthost for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
calling smarthost router
smarthost router
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like that your smarthost router is not recognizing the domain
as local (... is in ! +local_domains? yes.)
Does it correctly route the address as in
exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as a local domain?
I did: exim -bt [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And that's the same address you want to fail verification?
No, that is the recipient address. I am trying to verify sender
addresses. Doing the exim -bt ... test with any other (non-local,
even if it is a fake, non-existent domain) address
On 21/09/06, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
And that's the same address you want to fail verification?
No, it is not. After you answered my question in private e-mail (on
purpose?), I now understand the issue. Finally. Sorry for
On 15/09/06, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, George B. wrote:
On 14/09/06, maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blaeh, please try to reproduce with current trunk:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
Problem is still there :-(
From kern.log
reopen 369020
severity 369020 important
thanks
Hello,
I am having this (or a similar) problem too, and it prevents upgrading
the package:
---
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 30370 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace imapproxy 1.2.4-4 (using
On 04/08/06, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tag 335266 + wontfix
thanks
George B. wrote:
^
what if you would get a proper realname?
Not sure what you meant there. :-/
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 2.0.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #335266
This is still a problem
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.052
Severity: minor
Hello,
Not sure if this is a bug, but here goes:
make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=.2006081401 kernel_image
produces file:
linux-image-2.6.17.2006081401_2.6.17.2006081401-10.00.Custom_i386.deb
HTH,
George.
-- System Information:
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
Version: 2.6.26-2
Severity: important
Hello,
I got an Oops message (see below) when I plugged in a Belkin 54g USB wireless
network adapter. Looks like upstream is aware of the problem, but I'm reporting
this here so you can track this.
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.15-4
Severity: important
Hello,
I am having a problem getting any audio in via the microphone on my
IBM X60s laptop.
Card:
---
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High
Definition Audio Controller (rev 02)
---
cat
From: Ove Kaaven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:50:19 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#199951: wine: Trying to play a Logitech video email file
does not work properly
Mail to the submitter bounces, I'll close this.
Yup, but you may notice that I changed submitter
Package: xfce4
Version: 4.0.5-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hello,
Having read #290977 I installed xfce 4.2.1 from experimental, but I
could not get it to start. After logging in (using WDM) I get a black
screen and then Xserver restarts after a few seconds. I also tried using
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:55:53 +0100, Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:02:03PM +0100, George B. wrote:
- snip -
But if you read this:
ii gtk2-engines-xfce 2.1.10-1 A GTK+-2.0 theme engine for
Xfce
ii xfce4-mcs-plugins 4.0.6-1
Package: gaim
Version: 1:1.1.4-2
Followup-For: Bug #212652
Hello,
Sorry for the delay in replying (the original email address is no longer
valid.)
No, I have not been able to reproduce it in the current Gaim. I think
you can finally close this bug. :-)
.George.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Apr 2, 2005 1:40 AM, Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens when you run startx/startxfce?
With 4.2.1, nothing. I would get a black screen for a while (as I
would just before X loaded) then I would be returned to the terminal
with the message I mentioned above.
Now (4.0) it
Package: xfce4
Version: 4.2.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #302027
I though it was easier if I just re-installed and re-posted. It still
does not work, but I got a different error message this time, for some
reason (in .xsession-errors and the console I ran startxfce4 from:)
---
xfce4-session:
On Apr 4, 2005 3:33 PM, Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'ello George
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:26:41PM +0100, George B. wrote:
I though it was easier if I just re-installed and re-posted. It still
does not work, but I got a different error message this time, for some
reason
Package: bidwatcher
Version: 1.3.16-1
Followup-For: Bug #279298
Hello,
I'm sorry if I am rude (this is because I am quite annoyed at the
moment.)
Isn't it nice to find out why you've missed a bid after looking
through already existing bug reports. It's even nicer to know that
despite this
Package: bidwatcher
Version: 1.3.16-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
The 'open browser on auction' fails for Mozilla and Firefox because of
special characters present in the URL/command
e.g. for Mozilla the following will be fed to the program:
---
-remote
Package: bidwatcher
Version: 1.3.16-1
Followup-For: Bug #291210
Oops, this is just me being stupid (had a browser window open in
another workspace). Please close this bug.
.George Borisov.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Package: udev
Version: 0.114-2
Severity: normal
Hello,
The man page for scsi_id is not very helpful. :-(
It is out of date (still pointing at /sbin/scsi_id) and missing all of
the the '-[A-Z,a-z]' options (which are used exclusively in most of the
scsi_id examples I could find).
Thanks,
reopen 438094
thanks
It is out of date (still pointing at /sbin/scsi_id)
the the '-[A-Z,a-z]' options (which are used exclusively in most of the
scsi_id examples I could find).
I believe that they are undocumented by purpose.
And what purpose is that? (Beyond creating confusion in an
On 15/08/07, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 15, George B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is out of date (still pointing at /sbin/scsi_id) and missing all of
This is still a bug, regardless, as the executable is now in /lib/udev.
Gerorge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
reopen 438094
severity minor
thanks
On 15/08/07, George B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/08/07, Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 15, George B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is out of date (still pointing at /sbin/scsi_id) and missing all of
This is still a bug, regardless
Package: retchmail
Version: 1:1.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Upstream has released a new version of retchmail (1.1).
This makes retchmail work with Google Mail POP service (which it doesn't
at the moment).
Thanks,
George.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers
Package: psutils
Version: 1.17-24
Severity: important
Hello,
Not sure how useful this report will be, as upstream looks thoroughly
inactive, but hopefully it will help someone.
I am using psnup to combine two A5 pages in an input file in an A4 output file.
The pages are successfully
Package: elog
Severity: wishlist
Tags: security
Hello,
Current upstream version of Elog is 2.6.5.
This should contain fixes to address #392016.
Hope this helps,
George.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture:
Package: mailscanner
Version: 4.55.10-3
Followup-For: Bug #399424
Stef,
Thank you for the fix - it worked. :-)
(Sorry I took so long to reply. Looks like GMail's spam filter ate the
notification message).
Best wishes,
George.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
Package: mailscanner
Version: 4.51.5-1.1
Severity: important
Hello,
It seems that MailScanner is ignoring the SpamAssassin configuration
file in /etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf
For example, I have:
---
score BAYES_95 4.0
score BAYES_99 5.0
trusted_networks 10.0.0.0/24
score
Package: openoffice.org
Followup-For: Bug #422530
Hello,
I can confirm this problem. I upgraded from Etch to unstable and OO
broke (I only had Writer installed). Installing Calc fixed the problem.
(GTK errors go away after installing the openoffice.org-gtk).
Version: 2.2.0-6
HTH,
.George.
Package: nagios2
Version: 2.6-2+etch1
Severity: minor
Hello,
The default host file for localhost generated by the installer does not
point to correct location of the GD2 image (or the image for VRLM).
Current setting:
---
statusmap_image debian.gd2
---
Correct setting:
---
statusmap_image
On 06/06/07, Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have fixed this in svn in extinfo_nagios2.cfg. Is that the file you
are referring to? I have not seen the string in any other file in the
package.
Yup, that's the file. :-)
Thanks,
George.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nvidia-kernel-2.6.18-4-k7
Version: 1.0.8776+6
Severity: important
Hello,
I installed the nvidia drivers package as part of my (so far
unsuccessful) attempts to get a dual-monitor setup working.
When using the nvidia driver, Xorg locks up the system on the GDM
screen (with the GDM image
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6etch4
Followup-For: Bug #427986
Hello,
I've think I have also been bitten by this bug. Trying to authenticate
from a Windows 2000 client to a share protected by valid users fails.
The following error is generated in the log:
---
[2007/06/23 00:18:26, 0]
Correction: Windows XP SP2 client, not Windows 2000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.0-3
Severity: normal
Hello,
After the upgrade to v2 the global font settings in Preferences are only
applied to one of the 2 accounts I have configured in icedove.
I changed the fonts to work around the ugly display of text-only
messages, but only one of the
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #425977
Hello,
Looks like I jumped to conclusions to quickly. What seems to be
happening is that messages with the UTF8 character encoding are viewed
using a rubbish pixelated font. Viewing any message in UTF8 mode will
result in the same.
to install it on remote firewalls.
HTH
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27.20050707
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB
as
a recommended dependency, with a note about this in the documentation.
This at least leaves the user a choice to copy the plugins (as I have
done) manually from the Nagios server machine.
HTH
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT
Package: gaim
Version: 1:1.4.0-3
Followup-For: Bug #212274
Hello,
Sorry for really late reply - I no longer own that email address. :-S
No, I can't reproduce it, so please feel free to close this bug.
Thanks,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
a missing
dependency?
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages nagios-pgsql depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library
Package: nagios-pgsql
Version: 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-2.sarge.1
Followup-For: Bug #318864
I seem to have fixed this problem by installing the libdbi-perl and
libdbd-pg-perl packages.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
attach a copy of my check_nagios_db file.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages nagios-pgsql depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22
Package: nagios-pgsql
Followup-For: Bug #318864
A note in the README file should be fine, as there is no way of
actually getting Nagios to work without reading this. ;-)
Thanks,
.George.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 7/22/05, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is check_nagios_db able to read the config files? what happens
if you run it as root? this may sound dumb but are the variables
actually specified and uncommented in the right config file?
I'm afraid I chickened out of trying to get the pgsql
Just for the record, the clamav packages are (now) in http://volatile.debian.net
HTH,
George B.
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.1.23-12
Followup-For: Bug #319602
Hello,
I had the same problem. The port number fix worked, thanks for that.
HTH
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686
it to
compile. I know that there is some sort of variable I could pass when
building, but I could not get that to work bor some reason.
2) Get it to build with 4.0 :-p
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable
On 8/17/05, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.4.27-11 uploaded today depends on gcc-3.3 and should solve that
problem. (It is not yet installed in the archive but available from
http://packages.vergenet.net/pending/ )
:-)
Will it automatically use gcc-3.3 when compiling? With me
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
On 8/19/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 01:05:10PM +0100, George B. wrote:
On 8/18/05, Horms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it should do just that.
Sorry, which one? Automatically use gcc-3.3, or default to gcc-4.0?
Sorry for being unclear. If you build
On 6/20/05, Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
'ello George
I think we've fixed this properly now. If you could confirm and close
the bug that would be great.
You beat me to it - I was planning to suggest it when I got back from work. ;-)
Yes, this should probably be closed now,
On 6/25/05, Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this should probably be closed now, although there still were a
few 4.1 libriaries that did not get marked for auto-upgrade when I
installed 4.2 just now. The libxfce4util was on of them I think. If
you don't think that it will be a
Package: mrtg
Version: 2.12.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #245358
Hello,
I attach a script I am using to start MRTG.
I am not familiar with Debian policy, but perhaps the lack of such a
script is a little more severe than 'wishlist'?
HTH,
.George Borisov.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On 6/30/05, Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'll add it to the next upload but mrtg will not start as a
daemon by default.
If you want, it will be easy to add a check to the script along the lines of:
if [ -z `grep 'RunAsDaemon: Yes' $CFG | grep -v '#'` ]; then
echo Not
On 6/30/05, Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the best way is just add /etc/default/mrtg file with option,
# uncomment to run as a daemon
#
# RUN_AS_DAEMON=true
Then have in /etc/init.d/mrtg,
. /etc/default/mrtg
test x$RUN_AS_DAEMON == xtrue || exit 1;
] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.27'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2
---
A attach my kernel .config file.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686
that I am running an older
version of 2.4.27 kernel that has security issues (which is why I was
upgrading.) ;-)
HTH,
George B.
Package: alsa-source
Version: 1.0.9b-2
Severity: important
Hello,
The module selection screen that appears during package install is
broken: the sides are cut off so I can't see the modules I am selecting.
I attach a screenshot.
HTH,
George B.
-- Package-specific info:
--- Begin additional
,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27.20050707
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages mrtg
Package: nagios-mysql
Version: 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-2.sarge.1
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am trying to check host status using a remote command, but I am
getting this message in the main log file:
---
[1118999389] Warning: Unrecognized external command -
PROCESS_HOST_CHECK_RESULT;xeon;0;Host UP
---
Package: xfce4
Version: 4.2.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Any chance of moving xfce 4.2 from experimental to unstable? Sarge is
now out and I have been using the 'experimental' packages on 2 machines
without any problems for several months now.
Thanks,
.George.
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: emelfm
Version: 0.9.2-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
The latest version of x11-common (1.0.1-3) conflicts with emelfm, for
whatever reason. :-(
This makes it emelfm uninstallable, from now on.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release
Package: emelfm
Version: 0.9.2-7
Followup-For: Bug #235299
Hello,
The emelfm2 downloads page (http://emelfm2.net/DownLoads) links to
Ubuntu .deb packages.
Any chance you could use this for a Debian package?
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
Package: vim-gtk
Version: 1:6.3-058+1
Severity: minor
Hello,
I'm not sure this is a bug (I've just started using gvim and I've
probably configured something wrong), but here goes. I have the
colorscheme torte line in my .gvimrc which does what it is supposed
to. However, when gvim loads,
.
---
This was tested on a Debian Stable (Sarge) install, not this machine.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27.20050707
Locale
On 23/03/06, Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what is the bug in this?
It looks lame on a production system, IMO ;-)
The fact that it then gives the BSD licence as a reason looks really silly.
It's wrong, so it's a bug, even if it is cosmetic, however feel free
to re-class it as
line on the
indicator bar.
I attach a screenshot of the problem.
HTH,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (1001, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale
.)
Thanks,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages xfce4
On 08/06/06, Denis Barbier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
[...]
No variables are set in bash config files.
This may also be due to the login package, a bug has been fixed in
4.0.15-10.
I am now running login 4.0.16-1 and I still
to use the grep '0 hosts up' bodge to get around this.
Thanks,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (1001, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB
On 30/06/06, Fyodor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can kind-of see your point. On the other hand, Nmap completed
successfully and returned the results (the host was down). Nmap
returns nonzero when there is an error and Nmap cannot complete. If
Nmap was to return nonzero in your case, what
this helps,
George B.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (1001, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions
close 376141
thanks
Oops, did not notice the existence of the new openoffice.org-gtk
package. Installing this fixed the problem. Fonts are normal too. :-D
Sorry about the false alarm.
George.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n
Version: 2.5.0~rc2-2
Severity: minor
Hello,
From package description:
---
This package provides support for non-English interfaces in the
Sylpheed-Claws GTK2 mailer.
Currently supported locales are:
...
en_GB (British English)
---
English did come from
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n
Version: 2.5.0~rc2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sylpheed-claws-gtk2-i18n: Depends: sylpheed-claws-gtk2 (=
2.5.0~rc2-2) but 2.5.0~rc2-1 is installed.
Resolving
On 31/08/06, Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're supposing too much about what I know.
Please, could you tell me why do you believe this line you quoted is a
bug? :-)
The package description says the package is for *non-English*
interfaces and then lists British English
On 04/09/06, Eito Tamura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi George,
I am having the same problem as you did. So installing ampd package didn't
fix the problem?
Just those crappy HDD problem? Upgrading kernel might fix this problem?
Hello,
The problem is still there, although it does not occur very
Package: evolution
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
evolution: Depends: libegroupwise1.2-9 (= 1.6.2) which is a virtual
package.
---
HTH,
George.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.23b-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
For some reason when I do umount.cifs on a mounted share, the share
remains listed in 'df' output.
The share has definitely been unmounted (the mount point has an empty
folder in it that got created some time ago by accident.)
If I
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 2.0.3-4
Followup-For: Bug #335266
This is still a problem in OO 2.0.3 :-(
.George.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (1001, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
