Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-20
Severity: wishlist
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 30, 2005 4:25 AM
Subject: xlibs-dev Transition
To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
Hi all,
This mail is being written to let you all know about a
Package: siptoolbox
Version: 0.3.99rc2alpha3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
it is compiled agains libanimal-0.14.0.so.0, which is no longer availkible
as animal0 is updated. Pleas recompile.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT
get
the rest working.
I appreciate your help and understanding in that I might stumble in
the beginning...
By all means!
Regards
/Daniel
Hakan Ardo wrote:
On 10/29/05, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:20:03AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote
Hi,
I've handed over this package into the hands of Daniel Widenfalk. Any
progress Daniel?
On 12/28/05, Simon Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what are your current plans involving this package? At present, the gdb
packages built from it cannot be compiled on modern gcc at least for ARM
On 10/29/05, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 10:20:03AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Daniel: my experience of GCC development is non-existant but I am
rather good at Debian packaging and I happen to need an updated set of
cross-compilers. If you
On 10/20/05, Daniel Widenfalk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I saw at debian.org that you feel you don't have the time needed to
maintain the toolchain-source binutils and gcc package. I might be
interested in helping out depending on the amount and resources of
work needed.
I'm maintaining
On 10/20/05, Daniel Widenfalk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, that seems managable. I'll do it if you're willing to help me get
Great!
started and pointed in the right direction. Required tools and so on...
By all means.
Also, any logs and documentation (or pointers to) of what has been done
Package: libcompface
Version: 1989.11.11-24
Severity: wishlist
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 22, 2005 11:37 PM
Subject: possible freetype transition; improved library handling
needed for all C/C++ packages
To:
Hi,
Daniel Widenfalk has placed a lot of work into getting this pkg into
shape with the intention of adopting it. Please coordinate with him,
I'm more or less out of the loop...
On 10/16/06, Itzhak Ben-Akiva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hakan and all,
I'm looking for an interesting project to
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-7
Severity: minor
The xorg.conf man page referes to a mouse(4) manpage. It is provided by the
manpages but it is not the xorg mouse man page.
-- Systeh Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture:
Hi,
thanx for your repport. This is probably an upstream problem. I'll
upgrade the lib to 1.4.5 and if that dosn't help I'll forward the
problem upstream.
On 10/19/06, Stephan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.4-2
Compiling the following program with avr-gcc
Hi,
I've forwarded this upstream:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18169
On 10/19/06, Stephan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.4-2
Compiling the following program with avr-gcc gives an error about
multiple definition of __fixsfsi
// program code
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 1, 2006 8:54 AM
Subject: [bug #18169] multiple definition of __fixsfsi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED],
avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Update of bug #18169 (project avr-libc):
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bob Paddock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 1, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #3485] Using float arithmetic without
linking with -lm result in incorrect code
To: avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrea Baldoni [EMAIL
On 11/1/06, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Added suggest gdb-doc (closes: #392961)
This surely didn't remove the GFDL'ed texi files from the source as
done in the gdb source package.
Nope, I'll rectify that...
--
Håkan Ardö
On 1/16/06, Didier Verna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: compface
Version: 1:1.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Hi,
since the last upgrade, compface doesn't do its job anymore, but generates
unjustified warnings instead. Here is a testcase on the xbm file attached
below (that looks ok to
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I can do the upload today.
On 1/18/06, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
package xfaces
tag 346812 patch
thanks
I intend to NMU a fix for this bug sponsored by some member of the QA
group; patch attached. My pbuild result of this patch was clean, and
produced
Hi,
avr-gcc version 1:4.3.2-1 has been uploaded to unstable. It fixes bug
#501424 by dissabling the patches that has been incoporated into
gcc-4.3-source v 4.3.2-1which have propagated to lenny. I did not
include an extra copy of the gcc src code in avr-gcc as people are
conserned about the size
Package: referencer
Version: 1.1.3-2
Severity: normal
The metadata download features need libgnomevfs2-extra to be nistalled to work.
--
Håkan Ardö
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6Hi,
this continuous changing of the src provided by gcc is starting to get
tiresome :) I think we should include a copy of the gcc src in the avr-gcc
src pkg and drop the src-dep on the gcc-src package.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Tobias Klauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch
6
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
this continuous changing of the src provided by gcc is starting to get
tiresome :) I think we should include a copy of the gcc src in the
avr-gcc src pkg and drop the src-dep on the gcc-src package.
No. As a
Hi,
thx for the reminder. As of version 2.18-4, the winavr patch
31-binutils-2.18-avr-coff.patch is applied. Is that sattisfying or did
the supplied patch contain anything more?
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Andrew O. Shadoura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Sorry for pinging you, but
Thanx, I'll upload an update.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tags 493454 patch
thanks
This is caused by a missing dependency on texlive-extra-utils,
avr-libc uses epstopdf from this package during build. I'm not
providing a trivial patch, confirmed
Hi,
in a realtime system, this kind of behaviour can be caused by a lot of
things and it's not at all clear that it's the compiler. If you are
possitive it's the compiler I would suggest that you file an upstream
bug-repport as describe in:
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/README.Bugs
On Sat, Jul 19,
Hi,
the problem is that you need to upgrade avr-gcc to 1:4.3.0-3, because
I had to move the /usr/avr dir to become fhs compatible. I suppse I
should have made the new binutils conflict with the old gcc to reflect
this, but I missed that. The new gcc has been stuck in unstable
because of some build
Hi,
the build problem of gcc-avr seems to be that a few of the patches I
apply has now been applied to the src provided by gcc-src.
To prevent this kind of problems in the future do you think it's a
good idea to Build-Depend on an exact version of gcc-4.3-source? I
tried something like that some
Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-02-14 13:04
---
Hi Hakan,
Thanks for submitting this fix. I have applied it along with these
changelog
entries.
Cheers
Nick
include/opcode/ChangeLog
2008-02-14 Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR gas/2626
* avr.h
Hi,
I suppose those files should be moved to /usr/lib/gcc/avr/4.2.2/?
On Dec 20, 2007 6:45 PM, Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 4.2.2-1
Though I cannot say for sure whether I like this particular
respect of FHS or not, but still FHS (as of 2.3)
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
My system is unstable as of today.
Is there a missing build-depends: netpbm or something?
Probably, I'll look into it...
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Hakan Ardo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
My system is unstable as of today.
Is there a missing build-depends: netpbm or something?
Probably, I'll look
filed this as minor because it's easy to work around by undefining
ADC again after including the header.
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from the web
-- no debconf information
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
yes, I will release version 1.4.6 any day now. I have to update the
newdevices patch of binutils first though, because currently it has
the wrong architecture for at90usb82, preventing avr-libc from
compiling.
Sorry for the long delay...
On 8/13/07, Lars Noschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jan 8, 2007 2:00 PM
Subject: [bug #3485] Using float arithmetic without linking with -lm
result in incorrect code
To: Joerg Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED],
avr-libc-dev@nongnu.org
Update
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
sourcecode.
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
see
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1-source in order not to duplicate the gcc
sourcecode.
For sure this would be better. (I just didn't dare try this.) I
On 3/13/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
On 3/13/07, Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanx for the patch. A better solution however would be to
build-depend on gcc-4.1
Hi,
I'll have a look at this tonight. If Matthias solution works we'll use
thatone for etch, and the gcc-src solution for unstable. Should I do
anything special to make the release go into etch?
On 3/19/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Håkan,
Can you give an ETA for fixing this
Hi,
thanx for the repport. I've forwarded it upstream as bug #19060:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?19060
On 2/13/07, Terran Melconian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1.4.5-2
Severity: important
In avr/iotnx61.h, the PCMSK registers are defined as follows:
Does gcc 4.1.1 support AT90PWMx?
On 4/26/07, Tobias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.5-3
Severity: minor
With the latest package -- though stating in the changelog that they
have been rebuilt against the newest binutils-avr -- the support for
the AT90PWMx devices
Hi,
thanx for all your patches. I'm working on updating the avr packages
and your patches will be usefull. Conserning the FreeBSD patches:
On 4/19/07, Tobias Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I applied also serveral patches from the FreeBSD pages: [1]
binutils-patch-aa.diff
This is irrelevant
Hi,
gcc-4.1-source ver 4.1.2 is still in experimental. Once it is released
to unstable, I'll make this upgrade aswell. I plan to upgrade to 4.1.1
soon...
--
Håkan Ardö
Package: wnpp
I've relised that I don't have the time required to maintain this
package. There are currently quite a few bugs and gcc needs to be
upgraded to 4.0.
On 9/22/05, Tom Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any status updates/ETA on this one?
Sorry, no. I've got too little time to handle this, and I've put up
the package for adoption...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tevp.net
Illegitimus non carborundum
an updated toolchain-source to match. Thanks!
Will do...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCzUuTeXr56x4Muc0RAkiaAJ9rIaxPHUlEslBNZalowO+g6kQ6wwCgpBMF
0pRqgQfN0uk9qllbALpIS6o=
=UmK7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Hakan Ardo
/gcc/gthr-posix.h:43:21: pthread.h: No such file or directory
../../src/gcc/gthr-posix.h:44:20: unistd.h: No such file or directory
Seems like you are missing the libc headders. Did you install them? See the
README for more info.
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
thanx for the repport, we probably have to run tex once more during
the build, I'll look into it...
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Jonas Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.6.2-1
Severity: minor
in the Module Index all page numbers are only visible as ?? in
Hi,
no I think /usr/lib/avr is better. These are cross-compilation files,
and should not be mixed with the native files.
I have this fixed and will release as soon as I've done some more testing...
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, where to?
May be
Hi,
thanx I was waiting for some patches that should have been released by
now before doing a new release, but I guess it silly to wait any
longer so I'll make a new release tonight...
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Poulhi=C3=A8s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simply change line:
Hi,
I'm using:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00847.html
that patch will be included in 4.3.0-2 which I will release as soon as
I've confirmed it's working (==today).
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Marc =?UTF-8?Q?Poulhi=C3=A8s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hakan Ardo [EMAIL
Hi again,
it seams like this was not enough. The winavr and freebsd maintainers
have apparently been working on a 4.3 release with avr6 support for
some time, but no release yet. I suppose we'll make another 4.3
release without avr6 in the meantime...
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Hakan Ardo
OK, where to?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Severity: serious
According to the FHS, /usr/avr is not a valid directory, so your package
is violating the Debian Policy 9.1.1.
Please move the files somwhere else.
Thanks,
Bernd
On 4/14/06, Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: picon-unknown
Version: 2004.01.02-1
Severity: normal
It's been a couple of years, so it would be nice to have an update. Have
you thought about regular updates? Quarterly? Twice a year? Annually?
Just before a release?
Well the
]
Action: failed
Status: 5.2.0
Remote-MTA: dns; taket.barbanet.com (81.224.104.166)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access denied
--- Forwarded Message
To: Hakan Ardo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#362537: picon-unknown: New upstream
Hi,
thanx for the fix, but the patch were missing...
On 2/15/06, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Attached the patch for the version I uploaded. Please respond if
you think that the attached patch won't work.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key
Hi,
this is a good idea, but won't we need multiple version of avr-libc
then aswell, or will a avr-libc compiled with gcc 4.0 work with gcc
3.4?
On 2/17/06, Lars Noschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.0.2-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice, if you could install
On 2/17/06, Lars Noschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.0.2-1
Severity: minor
gcc-avr suggests the gcc-3.2 package which isn't available in neither
stable, testing or unstable.
Yes, it should be gcc-4.0 now...
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
-
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: toolchain-source
Version: 3.2-8
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vasek Stodulka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 11, 2006 9:25 AM
Subject: Problem with toolchain-source
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am using Debian Etch and I tried to run
TPKG_SERVER=ftp.cz.debian.org
Hi,
thanx for the repport. Would you consider doing a formal upstream bug
repport as desribed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
and reply to this mail with the upstream bugreport number.
Thanx!
On 5/11/06, Philipp Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
X-Debbugs-Cc:
Hi,
thanx for all the pacthes, I'll make a new release during this weekend...
On 2/3/06, Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
retitle 349015 compface: no longer reads XBM files
tag 349015 patch
thanks
The Debian-specific patch that allowed compface(1) to read XBM images
got lost between
Hi,
thanx for the patch, I'll apply it later today.
On 4/29/06, Aaron M. Ucko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xfaces
Version: 3.3-25
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Greetings.
As you may have heard, Debian is in the midst of a transition to
X11R7. One
Hi,
I'v forwarded this upstream as bug 2626:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2626
On 4/13/06, Terran Melconian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.15-3
The attiny26 supports some forms of the LPM (load program memory)
instruction, but under certain
Hi,
thanx for the patch. I'll make sure to included it in the next release
and I have forwarded it upstream as bug 16260:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=16260
On 4/4/06, Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.4.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
thanx for the info, I'll upgrade...
On 3/6/06, Carrick Detweiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1.4.3-1
There is a bug in avr/boot.h which causes the wrong macro to be used by
the preprocessor with some processors. This is fixed in the upstream
version as per bug:
Hi,
thanx for the repport, I'll move it to /usr/bin.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
Package: ftpwatch
Version: 1.20
Severity: minor
Hi,
i think ftpwatch should be in /usr/bin not /usr/sbin as its not
a system binary. Its for general user consumption as
Package: pulseaudio-module-zeroconf
Version: 0.9.21-3+b1
Severity: normal
The zeroconf features does not seem to work without installing rygel, so
pulseaudio-module-zeroconf should depend on it.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500,
Hi,
thanx for the report. I'll look into it...
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Elrond
elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote:
Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.20-2
Here's the problem in very short:
avr% avr-objdump -d bug-lpm.o
try_asm:
0: 25 91 lpm
Hi,
it seams to be the patch adding support for xmega devices that
intoruces this bug.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Hakan Ardo ha...@ardoe.net wrote:
Hi,
thanx for the report. I'll look into it...
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Elrond
elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Elrond
elrond+bugs.debian@samba-tng.org wrote:
Hi Hakan,
Thanks for your quick investigations!
* Can I tag the bug confirmed?
Yes, I can reproduce it.
* Do you need any further input from me to continue with
this issue?
Probably not, but if so I'll
Yes, there is currently no coff-avr support for version 2.20. When the
coff-avr patch is ported to binutils 2.20 I'll apply it...
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 11:04 PM, wzabo...@elektron.elka.pw.edu.pl
w.zabolo...@elka.pw.edu.pl wrote:
The coff-avr support is needed for testing of AVR code with VMLAB
Package: dvb-apps
Version: 1.1.1+rev1207-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
there are two muxes missing in dvb-t/se-Horby_Sallerup. Please add:
T 65000 8MHz 3/4 NONE QAM64 8k 1/4 NONE
T 57000 8MHz 3/4 NONE QAM64 8k 1/4 NONE
Tahnx
# diff -c /usr/share/dvb/dvb-t/se-Horby_Sallerup
Hi,
version 1:1.5.2-5 that I released to unstable is suitable for stable
aswell. Prior to this bugfix unstable and stable both contained
version 1:1.5.2-4. Attached is a patch with the fix. Do you want me to
build it for stable aswell?
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Michael S.
I don't know, but I would agree that the risk is small enough to drop
the matter and close the case.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Michael S.
Gilbertmichael.s.gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:44:44 +0200 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
version 1:1.5.2-5 that I released to unstable is
Hi,
xmega devices are currently supported using gcc 4.3.4, but there are
still no patch-sets for gcc 4.4.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm just checking up on the status of this bug and patch (for
xmega devices).
Arduino is now in testing, so
Hi,
thanx for the report. As it's not debian specific I've forwarded it upstream:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?30600
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Frank Miles f...@u.washington.edu wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.6.8-1
Severity: normal
There is no processor
Hi,
what are you trying to compile?
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Michael Ott mich...@king-coder.de wrote:
Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.20-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Compile PPS source code
Get the following errors:
avr-gcc -DMASTER -Wall
OK,
I'm afraid that I've not got access to that source. But I've tried to
compile a file test4.c containing:
volatile int cnt;
int main() {
while (1) cnt++;
return 0;
}
Using a similar commandline:
avr-gcc -DMASTER -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -g2 -Os -mmcu=atmega128
-mno-tablejump
Hi,
thx for the report. Attached is a patch fixing the buffer overflow.
I'll prepare a new release tonight.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:10 PM, metalho...@hushmail.com wrote:
Subject: compface: bufer overflow in xbm-file
Package: compface
Version: 1:1.5.2-4
Severity: grave
Justification: user
Hi,
I'm working on it. The main problem is that I have to use the source
from gcc-source and binutill-source packages, which are constantly
changing and the avr specific patches have to be updated every time.
There have been suggestions about using an exact version dependency on
the source
Hi,
I'm preparing an update to 4.3.4 with a patch to support the xmega
devices. I can't find any xmega support for 4.4 so I'm staying with
4.3 for now...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Bernhard bewo...@online.de wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.3.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Since
Any chance of having it reintroduced? Latest upstream version is based
on gcc 4.3.4. The avr backend of gcc is developed somewhat separated
from main gcc and only synced occasionally.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
severity 594279 serious
kthxbye
It's the gcc source tar archive. If avr-gcc is the only package still
needing it, I suppose it would make sens to place it in the gcc-avr
source package.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
On 31.03.2011 13:05, Hakan Ardo wrote:
Any chance of having
Sorry for the delay and thanx for the patch as well as for the
confirmation. I'll make a new release including it...
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Changwoo Ryu cw...@debian.org wrote:
I confirm the patch. Without it, obvious Arduino sketches don't work.
This is fixed in upstream version
Hi,
thanx for the report, it does indeed seem like the pdf is broken.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.7.1-2
Severity: normal
I could not read anything more than the chapter bookmarks with any of
evince, xpdf, gv, pdftotext
Hi,
thanx for the report. This does not seem to be debian specific so
please consider reporting it upstream aswell:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=avr-libc
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Bernhard bewoe...@yahoo.de wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1.8.0-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
this is fixed in the 4.7 release which is currently in experimental,
but should be released to unstable soon.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nicolas Schodet
schodet-report...@ni.fr.eu.org wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.5.3-4
Severity: important
There is a bug in
Are you saying that chunks with ./binutils works while chunks with
./gas does not? I've just tried to rebuild on a freshly update
chroot and it works just fine. Might this be due to some issue with
your system?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Adam Baxter volta...@voltagex.org wrote:
I'm not
Thanx!
I'm uploading a new version binutils-avr with this patch. Please
verify that it solves the problem.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote:
owner 686173
submitter 686173 jack23...@hotmail.com
reassign 686173 binutils-avr 2.20.1-2
severity 686173
Thanx for the patch and sorry for being slow with this. I'll try to
have this fixed within the next few days. Feel free to NMU if you
like, just keep me informed please.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Eduard Bloch e...@gmx.de wrote:
avr-l...@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: avr-libc manpages
Thanx for the report. I'll upgrade to 4.7.1.
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 1:22 AM, nuess0r nussgip...@gmx.ch wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 4.7.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Dear Maintainer,
avr-gcc segfaults when a source is compiled with the -mint8 option.
This bug is
Hi,
that is an old patch for gcc 4.5 that's supposed to have been
incorporated with gcc 4.7 which is what we currently use. Maybe the
name was changed? There is support for the following xmega128 devices:
atxmega128a1 atxmega128a1u atxmega128a3 atxmega128d3
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:16 AM,
Hi,
thanx for the report, I've forwarded it upstream:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54280
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:51 AM, a...@avarner.servebeer.com
a...@avarner.servebeer.com wrote:
Using the version of avr-gcc that comes with Atmel Studio 6.0 (for Windows,
unfortunately),
Hi,
they cant be placed among the standard manpages as they conflict with
the native libc manpages in manpages-dev. The intention is that you
read them using avr-man instead of man. That way those files are
considered datafiles of avr-man and the poliy places such files under
/usr/lib/. However
Thanx, I'll apply and release as soon as I verified that it still builds on x86.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote:
Hello,
I've just confirmed that gcc-avr builds successfully on sparc if
--disable-checking is dropped from configure options.
Best regards,
Thanx for the patch! I'll upgrade the package.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
Package: src:gdb-avr
Version: 7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Usertags: built-using
gdb-avr uses the gdb source from gdb-source, but does not indicate so with a
Thanx for the report. When they'll have it properly fixed upstream I
can update the package.
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com wrote:
Package: avr-libc
Version: 1:1.8.0-3
While trying to build a program for ATtiny13A on a recent Debian
Wheezy,
Great, we'll upgrade.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:58 PM, reportbug.deb...@moritz.augsburger.namewrote:
On 2013-07-08 06:41, reportbug.deb...@moritz.augsburger.name wrote:
according to
https://gnu.googlesource.com/gcc/+/724fcbc302453e801b823c317a1f729a1e3e3dd1
it got at least implemented,
Yes, your right. I'll update the dependency. Thanx for the report.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Moritz Augsburger
bug+deb...@moritz.augsburger.name wrote:
Package: gcc-avr
Version: 1:4.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
With binutils-avr 2.20.1-3 installed, I got pseudo
Hi,
thanx for the report. I've made a few test builds on s390x now and it
seems to build just fine, so I'm not sure what to do about this. I'm
uploading a new version with other fixes now, and I'll dig more if
this issue persists...
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
