Bug#336308: mozilla-firefox: On ARM920T processor both installation and firefox-bin die with Illegal instruction

2005-10-29 Thread Martin Guy
Package: mozilla-firefox Version: 1.0.6-5 Severity: important On my ARM system, apt-get install mozilla-firefox ends with: Setting up mozilla-firefox (1.0.6-5) ... Updating mozilla-firefox chrome registry.../usr/sbin/update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: line 106: 1354 Illegal instruction

Bug#388246: gcc-4.1.1 manual pages are now missing!

2006-09-19 Thread Martin Guy
Package: gcc Version: 4.1.1-13 (gcc version 4.1.2) I was about to report the dangling symlinks in the gcc man directory /usr/share/man/man1/i486-linux-gnu-cpp.1.gz - cpp-4.1.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/cpp.1.gz - cpp-4.1.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/c++.1.gz - /etc/alternatives/c++.1.gz

Bug#394876: gtk-gnutella in testing has expired

2006-10-23 Thread Martin Guy
Package: gtk-gnutella Version: 0.96.1svn11444 gtk-gnutella version: 0.96.2u (2006-08-03; GTK2; Linux i686) At startup the program claims it has expiresd and refuses to start up at all without cryptic user intervention. This is a recurring grave functionality bug (see bug 340933) Suggested fix:

Bug#396529: rezound packaging should recommend lame

2006-11-01 Thread Martin Guy
Package: rezound Version: 0.12.2beta-6 Hi! I just installed rezound from testing(etch) with aptitude, and when I run it it says on stdout: 'lame' executable not found in $PATH -- mp3 support will be disabled It turns out that toolame is installed on the system (by chance) but does not provide

Bug#391936: libagg-dev: new function render_scanlines_compound_layered is not in latest Debian version

2006-10-09 Thread Martin Guy
Package: libagg-dev Version: 2.4-1 From: Gnash project developer Since 19 June 2006, agg-2.4 contains a new optimised function render_scanlines_compound_layered which is used in the new Gnash AGG backend, but this addition has not propagated to the Debian package in unstable and testing.

Bug#501970: perl: FTBFS on arm: ext/threads/shared/t/stress.t failure

2008-10-17 Thread Martin Guy
On 10/17/08, Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may just be too much for arm - running 50 simultaneous threads doing a million loops may take more than the 30 seconds allowed on some of the older boxes. It failed on a 600MHz armel-sid box, but when I upped the timeout from 30 to 120

Bug#497147: usplash-theme-debian also needs +armel

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: usplash-theme-debian Version: 4 Severity: wishlist Hi again! I just spotted that usplash-theme-debian also needs armel adding to its Architecture list in control to match the list in usplash. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#497160: Cannot link to -lshp on armel: hidden symbol '__aeabi_dcmpgt'

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: shapelib Version: 1.2.10-4 Linking anything with -lshp fails on armel. e.g.: $ cat c.c main(){} ^D $ cc c.c -lshp /usr/bin/ld: a.out: hidden symbol `__aeabi_dcmpgt' in /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.3.1/libgcc.a(_cmpdf2.o) is referenced by DSO /usr/bin/ld: final link failed:

Bug#497161: Please re-enable gobjc on armel

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: gdb Version: 6.8-3 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertag: eabi, patch gobjc has now been ported to armel, so please re-enable the gobjc bindings in debian/control (gobjc [!armel] - gobc) thanks --- gdb-6.8/debian/control 2008-08-30 12:15:55.0 +0100 +++ gdb-6.8+armel/debian/control

Bug#497165: amiga-fdisk-cross is not being built on any architecture other than i386

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: amiga-fdisk-cross Version: 0.04-12 Not a bug in amiga-fdisk itself, but a Debian buildd issue that needs sorting On 16 Jan 2008, armel was added to the architecture list for amiga-fdisk-cross (bug #461081) but, despite being enabled for 12 architectures, the package has not been built

Bug#497172: Please add armel to architecture list for lua-gtk - or maybe use any

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: lua-gtk Version: 0.8+20080510+dash-1 lua-gtk is restricted to Architectures i386 and amd64 although every other lua5.1 package is available on Architecture: any. I've tried the build on armel and it turns out fine; would you add armel in debian/control, or expand it to any please?

Bug#497172: Hold that - build now fails on armel too.

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Sorry, I just retried the previously successful build of lua-gtk on armel, and though the build succeeds, the testsuite fails spewing Bus errors, which indicate non-aligned 32-bit word accesses. Please leave this with me unless there is a good reason why lua-gtk should be x86-only. Cheers --

Bug#495351: Works fine for me

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
I just tried this, on a Thecus N2100 (armv5te) running sid and with a tripwire set on misaligned data accesses (echo 5 /proc/cpu/alignment). Although the installation was very noisy, spewing warnings while recompiling common-lisp-controller three times, it turned out ok: n2100:/home/martin/arm#

Bug#495351: Problem is specific to debian rootfs in maemo chroot and is not present in Debian proper

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
I've tried this on armv5te and armv4t hardware under armel-sid under gdb and not, and in all cases it works fine, so I suggets closing this bug. For further details of the specific failing environment, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/[EMAIL PROTECTED]forum_name=ecls-list M -- To

Bug#497188: maxima build fails on armel

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: maxima Version: 5.16.2-1 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi The build of maxima on armel fails saying: Loading binary-gcl/float.o Error in FPPREC1 [or a callee]: The function $RATDISREP is undefined. Fast links are on: do (use-fast-links nil) for debugging Broken at

Bug#497172: Please add armel to architecture list for lua-gtk - or maybe use any

2008-08-31 Thread Martin Guy
done Upstream bug ticket http://luaforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=29514group_id=121atid=576 Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#497172: Please add armel to architecture list for lua-gtk - or maybe use any

2008-09-02 Thread Martin Guy
The word-alignment bugs are now fixed in lua-gtk CVS Upstream's diffs to the source are attached, but it doesn't apply cleanly to the 0.8 - among other things, there are new source files, and unrelated extra const declarations. lua-gtk version 0.9 was released on 25 August 2008 - is that in time

Bug#501596: netwatch alignment errors on ARM garble IP addresses or give bus errors

2008-10-08 Thread Martin Guy
Package: netdiag Version: 1.0-8 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Hi! Since etch at least, netwatch has not worked on arm: it reports lots of phantom accesses in the remote IP addresses composed of the high-order bytes of the local IP address in the low-order bytes and 16 bytes of garbage

Bug#501596: Der, geddit right

2008-10-08 Thread Martin Guy
Er, hold that - the patch is duff because modifies Makefile, not Makefile.in so gets overwritten in a new extract/build cycle There's also an alignment bug in showtraf - put that on hold... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#501596: Der, geddit right

2008-10-08 Thread Martin Guy
On 10/8/08, Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Er, hold that - the patch is duff because modifies Makefile, not Makefile.in so gets overwritten in a new extract/build cycle Ok - here's the version that makes the same patch to Makefile.in instead, assiduously rebuild from scratch on arm-sid

Bug#463277: More analysis

2008-07-29 Thread Martin Guy
The moment in which it segfaults is the first time it runs the interpreter it has just built, axi, during the build, so I guess the whole interpreter is broken. I've tried a debugging build by hacking debian/rules: ./cnf/bin/afnix-setup -o --prefix=/usr ./cnf/bin/afnix-setup -g

Bug#463277: More analysis of afnix 1.5.2 failing to build on arm old-abi

2008-07-31 Thread Martin Guy
It also fails on arm-sid if compiled with gcc-4.2 in the very same way: SEGFAULT at the same line in the build. However, it succeeds if compiled with gcc-4.1 - see my AFNIX doc for details of the hack. Unfortunately to achieve this you need to patch one of the package's config files to select

Bug#486654: FTBFS blocking RC bug fixes

2008-07-31 Thread Martin Guy
On 7/28/08, peter green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * adonthell: *** warning: prefs::read_adonthellrc: creating config file failed Fatal Python error: exceptions bootstrapping error. Workaround for this is to use python 2.4, I have posted a patch that does that to

Bug#463277: Smaller patch to same effect, doesn't needlessly use gcc-4.1 on armel

2008-07-31 Thread Martin Guy
only) if you build with g++-4.2 or 4.3 the build segfaults the first time it tries to run the interpreter. MACHCONF is set to linux-arm on both arm and armel, so we invent another config variable to distringuish between Debian arm and armel, and select gcc-4.1 on arm only. Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#486654: Der...

2008-07-31 Thread Martin Guy
Actually your patch works fine, since D_A_B_CPU matches arm both on arm and on armel. My apologies. M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#458745: misaligned access

2008-08-03 Thread Martin Guy
Confirmed - there is a misaligned word access in the test case # echo 5 /proc/cpu/alignnment $ gcc foo.c $ ./a.out Bus error reproducible in arm-sid using old-abi or eabi-oldabi-compat kernels. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#493167: confirmed

2008-08-10 Thread Martin Guy
Bug confirmed on arm-sid chroot under eabi kernel with oabi-compat, using foo$ xhost bar bar$ DISPLAY=foo:0 arora See also the mail thread starting at http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2008/08/msg5.html for backtraces. For ssh access to a fast arm box mail me -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#452179: present with ati driver, ok on fbdev, ati AccelMethod nonexistent

2008-08-18 Thread Martin Guy
Hi! I get the same effect using the ati X server with no special flags, whereas all is ok when using the fbdev server. The gimprc workaround also sorts the problem on the ati driver. However the workaround Section Device Identifier ATI Technologies, Inc. Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x

Bug#496305: nvi cannot handle characters with the top bit set

2008-08-24 Thread Martin Guy
Package: nvi Version: 1.81.6-3 When I edit /var/lib/dpkg/status using nvi and then search for a string (or page down a few times), I get: Conversion error on line 428 I then can't 428G, but 427G reveals: Package: libgammu3 Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: libs

Bug#496310: xdm enabled at startup is deaf to the keyboard

2008-08-24 Thread Martin Guy
Package: xdm Version: 1:1.1.8-3 hi! I've dist-upgraded from etch to lenny and now when xdm starts up the X server at boot I get the login window but it seems totally deaf to the keyboard. The mouse moves ok. I've tried every key with no luck, except once when it suddenly spurted a load of

Bug#496310: Invalid: in inittab there was a login session enabled on vt7

2008-08-24 Thread Martin Guy
My fault: it was caused by me having enabled consoles on F1to F9 in inittab and the default xdm server starting on vt7 instead of vt10 der. closing... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#492175: libidl cannot be built without fakeroot

2008-07-24 Thread Martin Guy
Package: libidl0 Version: 0.8.10-0.1 A user reports that libidl0, build as root with dpkg-buildpackage, fails saying: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kevin/Debian/libidl0/libidl-0.8.10' /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\libIDL\ -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\libIDL\

Bug#495351: Fwd: ARM sigill

2008-09-06 Thread Martin Guy
The upstream maintainer suggests the following fix in ecl to work around this problem -- Forwarded message -- From: Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sep 5, 2008 11:23 PM Subject: ARM sigill To: Martin Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seems I found the problem. His system does

Bug#497050: confirmed

2008-09-09 Thread Martin Guy
Yup, me too since today. When the boot succeeds, the Cleaning up ifupdown message is not printed. The system here is Debian lenny, with kernel 2.6.25-2-686. If it hangs again I'll copy the boot output. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#443322: Yes, maintain the original behaviour

2008-09-11 Thread Martin Guy
Hi Yes, this is a security problem. Letting people probe usernames compromises Unix security - the behaviour must be identical, including the time taken, whether the username is valid or not (There was once a hole introduced when someone decided not to bother hashing the supplied password if

Bug#465246: user-root exploit in vmsplice()

2008-02-11 Thread Martin Guy
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-17etch1 Severity: important There is a bug in vmsplice from 2.6.17 to 2.6.24.1 that can be exploited by any user process to gain root privileges. info is here http://isc.sans.org/newssummary.html which links to the source code for the

Bug#460562: change of package name to libdb-dev makes it uninstallable

2008-01-13 Thread Martin Guy
Package: db Version: 4.6.21-5 Hi! I'm trying to satisfy the build dependencies of subversion in sid, but cannot because - subversion build-depends on libdb4.4-dev and libaprutil1-dev - libaprutil1-dev depends on libdb-dev - libdb4.4-dev provides and conflicts with libdb-dev This seems to be

Bug#460562: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#460562: change of package name to libdb-dev makes it uninstallable

2008-01-13 Thread Martin Guy
2008/1/13, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there a good reason not to continue the scheme used in libdb4.[12345] ? The name scheme is not the problem, it's the fact that all Berkeley DB -dev packages conflict (because they all install the db.h header file). the db.h conflict is not

Bug#460562: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#460562: Bug#460562: change of package name to libdb-dev makes it uninstallable

2008-01-13 Thread Martin Guy
reassign 460562 db thanks Sorry, it's not as simple as that; it impacts on more than one other package. If you want to get everyone to use libdb4.6 instead of explicitly 4.[2345] (which would be a Good Thing, assuming 4.6 is backward-compatible with all the others), then I think you need to file

Bug#460562: [Pkg-db-devel] Bug#460562: Bug#460562: change of package name to libdb-dev makes it uninstallable

2008-01-13 Thread Martin Guy
feel free to help out by adding to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=oldbdb;dist=unstable Can do. Should I ask them to change to requiring libdb-dev or libdb4.6-dev? I.E. Is the future plan to keep one version only and simply increase libdb's version number, or to carry on

Bug#461080: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: amoga-fdisk Version: 0.04-11 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture lists in debian/control See wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#461081: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: amiga-fdisk Version: 0.04-11 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture list in debian/control (or make it any) (A new ARM port should be going into lenny to replace the old one in lenny+1; see wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) Thanks

Bug#461088: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: gsynaptics Version: 0.9.7-3 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture list in debian/control (or make it any) (A new ARM port should be going into lenny to replace the old one in lenny+1; see wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) Thanks --

Bug#461089: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: ddccontrol Version: 0.4.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture list in debian/control (A new ARM port should be going into lenny to replace the old one in lenny+1; see wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#461090: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: ibam Version: 1:0.4-4 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture list in debian/control (A new ARM port should be going into lenny to replace the old one in lenny+1; see wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#461091: please add to architecture lists

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: kerry Version: 0.2.2-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi kerry's architecture list in the control file says: Architecture: amd64 arm i386 ia64 powerpc whereas in sid it is available in 5 other architectures

Bug#461096: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Guy
Package: nictools-pci Version: 1.3.8-1.1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture list in debian/control (A new ARM port should be going into lenny to replace the old one in lenny+1; see wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) Thanks -- To

Bug#408787: armel/armeb have not been added in new nictools-pci upload

2008-01-17 Thread Martin Guy
Hi! Just to say the why of the reopening: armel and armeb have not been added to debian/control, whatever the changelog may say Bless M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461096: and armeb

2008-01-17 Thread Martin Guy
... and armeb as well, while you're at it. The Debian ChangeLog says this has been done, but it hasn't. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461564: Upgrade to latest version would give manyfold speed improvement

2008-01-19 Thread Martin Guy
Package: foomatic-filters Version: 3.0.2-20061031-1.2 Severity: wishlist --- Przemyslaw Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 19 Jan 2008 ... I replaced foomatic-rip from (foomatic-filters 3.0.2-20061031-1.2) with new one from http://www.openprinting.org/foomatic-rip (this version is not yet

Bug#461564: Further info

2008-01-19 Thread Martin Guy
For info, the specific config exhibiting the immense slowness was: HP DJ 990cxi connected via usb, driver is hpijs 2.6.10+1.6.10-4.2+lenny1 (and hplip 1.6.10-4.2+lenny1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461564: Get it right!

2008-01-20 Thread Martin Guy
...and it was a 600Mhz ARM. Der! M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461564: and again

2008-01-20 Thread Martin Guy
... and the ratio was Actually gs is eating only about 20%, and foomatic-rip takes 80% Sorry, I must have been having a bad day. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2008-01-20 Thread Martin Guy
Strange, I've all zeroes right after a boot (with an OABI kernel). Here it's a vanilla Debian armel 2.6.23-1-iop32x kernel on XScale-80219 rev 0 (v5l) It's not serious as misaligned accesses in kernel are always trapped and fixed up. I'd be inclined to close this item for lack of importance.

Bug#463444: rbot is uninstallable due to dependecy on ruby 1.9

2008-01-31 Thread Martin Guy
Package: rbot Version: 0.9.10-1 Severity: serious # apt-get install rbot The following packages have unmet dependencies: rbot: Depends: ruby ( 1.9) but 4.1 is to be installed E: Broken packages because rbot Depends: ruby (= 1.8), ruby ( 1.9) but ruby switched to a versioning scheme which

Bug#439832: Status of armel in the archive?

2008-02-02 Thread Martin Guy
2008/1/30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:32:55AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: [armel]'s quality is at least matching the current arm port Could you please comment on the current status and list outstanding issues blocking the inclusion of armel in the

Bug#463803: ardour would enjoy libfftw3-dev

2008-02-03 Thread Martin Guy
Package: ardour Version: 2.2-1 While configuring on debian, ardour says: Checking for fftw3f...no Checking for fftw3...no Checking for C header file fftw3.h... no - You do not have the FFTW single-precision development

Bug#463816: Please add armel to architectures list

2008-02-03 Thread Martin Guy
Package: libinotify-ruby Version: 0.0.2-1 Severity: wishlist Please add armel to the architectures lists for libinotify-ruby1.[89] in debian/control for benefit of the new ARM port [1] ... or make it any to avoid future hassle with new ports. Thanks [1] http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort --

Bug#440425: Yes, QEMU does need gcc-3.4

2008-02-04 Thread Martin Guy
QEMU requires gcc-3.4 at runtime because it emulates 5 different CPUs by translating the machine code into C, compiling the C fragments and editing the assembler output to trim off function call/return sequences. This makes it the fastest emulator on the planet but it does not understand gcc-4

Bug#464140: Please include armel in debian/control

2008-02-05 Thread Martin Guy
Package: lua-gtk Version: 0.7-1 Severity: wishlist Please add armel and armeb to the Architectures: list for lua-gtk in debian/control since it builds fine there too. (See wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort) While you're at it, I think it would be better to put a single Architectures: clause in the

Bug#434016: Also broken on armel

2008-02-06 Thread Martin Guy
Yes, armel gives the same error message -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#464140: Please include armel in debian/control

2008-02-08 Thread Martin Guy
2008/2/8, Enrico Tassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please compilerun the test file src/callback-test.c and give me feedback. It exits 0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#464903: Please add arm, armel and armeb to Architectures: list (or change to any)

2008-02-09 Thread Martin Guy
Package: music123 Version: 15-0.1 Severity: wishlist Hi! The arm, armel and armeb architectures are missing from the Architectures: line in debian/control It's particularly pernicious to specify Archirectures in the Package: clauses of debian/control because the package seems to build fine

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2008-01-09 Thread Martin Guy
2007/12/28, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I can reproduce this problem with 2.6.18-5 and 2.6.22-3, but not with 2.6.23-1 from unstable. Can you try 2.6.23? The 2.6.23-2 kernel package I built from source will still not boot from flash (a separate issue) but I can copy the

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2008-01-09 Thread Martin Guy
2008/1/9, Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Presumably right after boot without doing anything special? No, after some kernel building. Right after a boot it's: n2100:~# cat /proc/cpu/alignment User: 0 System: 3928 Skipped:0 Half: 0 Word: 3928

Bug#460067: Support compilation with gpc as well as (instead of?) fpc

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: gearhead Version: 1.100-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi gearhead currently build-depends on fp-compiler, which is only available on 5 architectures. If it could transition to gpc (pascal-compiler), it would be available on all 16. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#460068: Support compilation with gpc as well as (instead of?) fpc

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: hedgewars Version: 0.9.0-7 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi hedgewars currently build-depends on fp-compiler, which is only available on 5 architectures. If it could transition to gpc (pascal-compiler), it would be available on all 16. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#460069: Support compilation with gpc as well as (instead of?) fpc

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: imapcopy Version: 1.01+20060420-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi imapcopy currently build-depends on fp-compiler, which is only available on 5 architectures. If it could transition to gpc (pascal-compiler), it would be available on all 16. -- To

Bug#460071: Support compilation with gpc as well as (instead of?) fpc

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: lazarus Version: 0.9.24-0-4 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Hi! Is it possible for lazarus to support gpc as well as (instead of?) fpc? If so, it would be available on all 16 architectures instead of just 5. I don't know how compatible the two compilers are,

Bug#460077: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: happs Version: 0.8.8+darcs20070523-2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi We now have ghc6 in the armel port, so please add armel to the ghc6-version-picking architecture lists in debian/control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#460081: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: haskell-binary Version: 0.3-2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi We now have ghc6 in the armel port, so please add armel to the ghc6-version-picking architecture lists in debian/control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#460083: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: haskell-x11-extras Version: 0.4-2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi We now have ghc6 in the armel port, so please add armel to the ghc6-version-picking architecture lists in debian/control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#460082: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: haskell-hlist Version: 2.0+darcs20070316-2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi We now have ghc6 in the armel port, so please add armel to the ghc6-version-picking architecture lists in debian/control -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#460084: please add armel to architecture list

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: jack-audio-connection-kit Version: 0.103.0-6 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add armel to the architecture lists in the control file so it is included in the new ARM port http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#460096: please add arm variants to exclusion list in debian/control

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: shogun Version: 0.4.4-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add !armel and !armeb to debian/control's Build-Depends: atlas3-base-dev [!arm] for the forthcoming variants of the arm port [1] Thanks [1] http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#460098: please add armel to architecture list, if ghc6 version dependency is important

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: happs Version: 0.8.8+darcs20070523-2 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi We now have ghc6 in the armel port [1] so debian/control's Build-Depends clauses: ghc6 (= 6.6.1) [alpha amd64 arm hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], ghc6

Bug#460121: openssh builddep on groff is too severe: only groff-base is necessary

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: openssh Version: 1:4.7p1-1 Severity: wishlist the build dependency on groff is unnecessary: the smaller groff-base is enough (I've checked this with groff-base and no groff installed, and it builds fine with dpkg-buildpackage -d) This would make bootstrapping of future ports slightly

Bug#460136: please include armel in debian/control architecture list to guarantee selinux support

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: openssh Version: 1:4.7p1-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi debian/control says: Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev [alpha amd64 arm armeb hppa i386 ia64 lpia m68k mips mipsel powerpc ppc64 s390 sparc], libgnomeui-dev (= 2.0.0) | libgnome-dev to which armel should

Bug#460141: please add arm variants to exclusion list in debian/control

2008-01-10 Thread Martin Guy
Package: cgal Version: 3.3.1-1 Severity: wishlist User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Please add !armel and !armeb to debian/control's Build-Depends: [!arm !m68k] clause for the forthcoming variants of the arm port [1] Thanks [1] http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#453009: Upgrade to varkon-1.19B removes need for gcc-3.3

2007-11-26 Thread Martin Guy
Package: varkon Version: 1.18A-3 Varkon FTFBS on the new ARM EABI port because it has -fwritable-strings in its makefiles, which disappeared after gcc-3.3, and ARM EABI only works from gcc-4.1; it will never have gcc pre-4.1 ---Johan Kjellander [EMAIL PROTECTED]--- As far as I know

Bug#455892: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: please enable process accounting

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Guy
Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x Version: 2.6.22+11 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi The armel kernel for iop32x doesn't have BSD process accounting configured in, breaking package acct. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-12 Thread Martin Guy
Package: linux-image-2.6-iop32x Version: 2.6.22+11 User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: eabi Severity: wishlist After running for a mere 20 hours, /proc/cpu/alignment reports millions of misaligned word accesses from the kernel: $ cat /proc/cpu/alignment User: 0 System: 2765980

Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-28 Thread Martin Guy
I can reproduce this problem with 2.6.18-5 and 2.6.22-3, but not with 2.6.23-1 from unstable. Can you try 2.6.23? Seems I can't, no, having spent a day trying. But then I never built a kernel package before, so that doesn't mean much. After most of a day trying I'm giving up. Can you give me a

Bug#425971: Bug#455909: linux-image-2,6-iop32x: many misaligned memory accesses

2007-12-28 Thread Martin Guy
Hi! The armel port is still blocked on this item. The bugfix was submitted over 7 months ago and included over a month a go in version control. If possible, would you expedite an upload of the new version please? These timescales are glacial! Thanks M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#458745: arm-only miscompilation of alloca code

2008-01-02 Thread Martin Guy
I just tried foo.c on up-to-date arm-sid and armel-sid systems, both under qemu and on real hardware and I cannot reproduce the problem; all succeed the same way, for example: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 foo.c [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./a.out 0xbe92ec84 0x1 0x2 0x3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc

Bug#462962: apt-get --no-install-recommends is not documented in man page

2008-01-28 Thread Martin Guy
Package: apt Version: 0.7.10 The new -no-install-recommends flag is not documented in the man page for apt-get. Given the new install-recommends-by-default policy, this is particularly important. It would be worth mentioning the APT::Install-Recommends in the manual page as well and to highlight

Bug#460084: please add armeb too

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
While you're at it, you may as well add armeb for that forthcoming port -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#458911: please add armeb too

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
while you're at it, you might as well add the forthcoming armeb architecture too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#460077: Please add armeb also

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
While you're at it, you may as well also add armeb, the forthcoming big-endian version of the port -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#435384: Please add armeb too

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
While you're at it, you may as well add the forthcoming armeb port as well -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#434846: PLease add armeb also

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
While you're at it, you may as well add the forthcoming armeb port as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#436237: Please add armeb too

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
While you're at it, also adding armeb for that future port would be a good idea. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461091: Please add armeb also

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
While you're at it, if you add armel, please also add the forthcoming armeb port too -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#461081: and armeb

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
...while you're at it, adding armeb for that future port would be a good idea too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#463128: Please allow later versions of gcc

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Guy
Package: emile Version: 0.10-1 Severity: wishlist emile is the last package in Debian to require gcc-3.3 If it will compile with gcc-4 it can also be included in the new armel architecture (which lacks even gcc-3.4) - at present it fails early on because of signed/unsigned errors and -Werror (at

Bug#443052: Galeon goes into an infinite loop saving a page that contains #8230;

2007-09-18 Thread Martin Guy
Package: galeon Version: 2.0.2-4 Saving the page http://www.apexonline.com/melodybar/cataf~1.htm to a local file, galeon goes into an infinite loop consuming 100% CPU. strace reveals that it is doing: write(24, , 0); write(24, , 0); write(24, #48;, 5); repeatedly, and the output file

Bug#443453: Purging xboing does not remove highscore file

2007-09-21 Thread Martin Guy
Package: xboing Version: 2.4-29 Severity: minor Installation of xboing creates /var/games/xboing.score but purging does not remove that file As a consequence, when all games are removed, apt-get complain forever that /var/games is not empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#443493: When pinball is purged it does not remove directory /var/games/pinball

2007-09-21 Thread Martin Guy
Package: pinball Version: 0.3.1-7 Severity: minor Installation of pinball creates /var/games/pinball/*/highscores but purging it does not remove the directory. As a consequence, when all games are removed, apt-get complain forever that /var/games is not empty. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#405077: iodbc rundepends on libiodbc2

2006-12-30 Thread Martin Guy
Package: iodbc Version: 3.52.4-3 iodbcadm-gtk binary in package iodbc requires shared library libiodbcinst.so.2 so it needs to depend on package libiodbc2 # apt-get install iodbc ... The following NEW packages will be installed: iodbc ... $ iodbcadm-gtk iodbcadm-gtk: error while loading shared

Bug#299095: back again in attr 2.4.32-1

2006-12-17 Thread Martin Guy
Package: attr Version: 2.4.32-1 This bug, of attr using system calls directly, presents itself again in attr 2.4.32-1. In this case it is with the switch to ARM EABI that triggers the bug because the system call base number changes. If this bug really was fixed in 2.4.31-1, then that fix has

  1   2   3   >