with NMU to the delayed queue with the proposed fix.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Jiff,
we here at the Debian Bug Squashing Party currently taking place at the
Linuxhotel in Essen, Germany tried to replicate your bug.
We are *not* seeing the issue when calling iceape on a regular user's
shell.
which iceape, in our case, returns /usr/bin/iceape (which is a shell
Errm. Sorry. We're not seeing the *same* error message, we're seeing
/usr/lib/iceape/iceape-bin: error while loading shared libraries:
libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory.
Please do perform the checks we asked you to perform in our previous
message - even
Am 24.11.2012 01:25, schrieb Bzzz:
we here at the Debian Bug Squashing Party currently taking place at the
Linuxhotel in Essen, Germany tried to replicate your bug.
Hehe, Essen is a nice place.
And so is the Linuxhotel there. ;-)
We are *not* seeing the issue when calling iceape on a
Hi Sune,
judging from the lack of negative comments on the thread ;-) , it seems
that option 1 is the way to go.
As this is a release-critical bug, do you think you could upload a fix
so we can mark the bug as closed?
If there's any way we can help, just let us know.
Kind Regards,
Stefan
.
As this is a release-critical bug, is there any way we can help you to
get the bug fixed and closed?
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur (speaking as part of the Debian Bug Squashing Party taking
place at the Linuxhotel, Essen, Germany this weekend)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
Hi,
is there any chance of getting this unblock request through this weekend?
Currently, it is blocking
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686148 from getting
closed, which is a release-critical bug.
If there is any way we can help, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Stefan
Package: buildd.debian.org
Severity: normal
These packages need to be recompiled, details see bug #682593.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu kphotoalbum_4.2-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libkipi8 4:4.8.4-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu digikam_4:2.6.0-1+b1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libkipi8 4:4.8.4-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu kamoso_2.0.2-1 . ALL . -m rebuild against libkipi8 4:4.8.4-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
+0200
+
ampache (3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove statements in debian/ampache.postrm that manually remove
conffiles,
unblock ampache/3.6-git408e713+dfsg-3.1
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur (part of the Debian Bug Squashing Party taking place at the
Linuxhotel, Essen
Info: Fix will not be possible before DEC 02, 2012, as it is connected
to 693710 which will not be fixed before that date (see bug history).
Please stand by. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you for
traveling with debian rail. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Info: Fix will not be possible before DEC 02, 2012, due to some issues
upstream that do not belong into a bug report.
Please stand by. We apologize for the inconvenience. Thank you for
traveling with debian rail. ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
See #692122 - it should be removed instead of unblocked, that way #688436
would stop being a release-critical bug for wheezy.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.6
APT prefers
need further info, please let me know.
Screenshots have been made available to the maintainer in a previous,
direct E-Mail.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Am 27.04.2014 11:48, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
works for me with current sid/amd64, closing.
So this bug is a WONTFIX for Wheezy?
-Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: snapshot.debian.org
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I'm seeing an issue using snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-security for
wheezy.
Since it works every other try, could it be that one of your mirrors is out of
sync/misconfigured?
* What led up to the situation?
I first
mailing
list x2go-...@lists.x2go.org
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-dev
- --
BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur
Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364
Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Actually ... if I'm not mistaken, the patch is rather trivial:
http://vncsnapshot.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/vncsnapshot/vncsnapshot/listen.c?r1=1.6r2=1.7pathrev=MAIN
(Note that there is an earlier version of the patch,
Package: vncsnapshot
Version: 1.2a-5.1+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Whenever I try to follow the instructions in the EXAMPLES section of the
man page on how to use it as a listening server (vncsnapshot -listen 0
portrait.jpegWait for a server to connect to this host (using
screen 0),
Hi,
http://sourceforge.net/p/vncsnapshot/bugs/5/ lists a patch for this
issue. The problem is that it is dated 2006-04-01, it's only in the CVS,
and was promised to be in the next release - however, there haven't been
any new releases since then.
So I guess someone with programming skills will
for indicators of the desired time zone, like UTC, CET, CEST, ...
OR by figuring out which time zone the machine is set to and which
adjustment might need to be made.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
)"
Most likely, this should be changed to:
"Not starting X2Go Client in TCE mode"
as in the lines below.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
- --
BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur
Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergerich
rc/live-build/1:20171207/scripts/build/binary_hdd/#L53
> What typo ?
>
> ntfs-3g is a valid package
> /sbin/mkfs.ntfs is a path to an existing program
Yes, /sbin/mkfs.ntfs is.
But, /sbin/mkfs.nfts is not. And that's what that source looks for.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
workaround, not as a solution.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
ll 2>/dev/null; then
should be changed to
if [ -d /run/systemd/system ] ; then
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
--
BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur
Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364
Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243
ir=/overlay/root-rw/upper
string and add "you may need to prefix /${upperdir##*/} to paths" or
something like that to the syslog message.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
--
BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur
Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364
Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243
sue, but the corresponding "system_tor"
config file is part of the tor package, I figured I should file this
against the tor package. Feel free to reassign the bug to the apparmor
package if bugs about broken/incomplete apparmor profiles should be
filed against that one. The apparmor package
st the subdirectory /live containing your squashfs), and use
one of the iso parameters.
Using the live-media*-Parameters should make it possible to use a
squashfs file directly, without having to wrap it into an iso. I haven't
tried this myself lately, though.
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
ere/ for an official image,
for example.
You will probably have to combine that with live-media=removable-usb so
it will scan removable USB media only.
I don't see why you would need a different partition for each image, you
should be able to use different live-media-path entries instead (one per
boot menu entry).
Kind Regards,
Stefan Baur
31 matches
Mail list logo
