usty-backports')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-2-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
> 1 of 3 tests failed
> Please report to capnpr...@googlegroups.com
>
>
> --
> Yunqiang Su
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
apnproto/capnproto-debian'
> make[1]: *** [check] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/capnproto/capnproto-debian'
> dh_auto_test: make -j1 check returned exit code 2
> make: *** [build-arch] Error 2
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Tom Lee wro
ff 7ff7ffff
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Hey Yunqiang,
> >
> > I spoke to the upstream maintainer. He's asked if you can compile & run
> this
> > small C program (with and without optimizations) and to send
Great, thanks again. Seems like this may have been an upstream bug. I've
pushed a patch -- can you try the latest code on master?
http://github.com/thomaslee/capnproto-debian
Cheers,
Tom
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Tom Le
ng directory `/tmp/capnproto/capnproto-debian'
> make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/capnproto/capnproto-debian'
> make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/capnproto/capnproto-debian'
> make[1]: *** [check] Erro
this bug. I'll
keep you posted.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
> dpkg-buildpackage -B
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Weird. Can I ask what commands you're using to build the package from the
> > github repo?
> >
&
; let you know when they're ready to try again.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
> I can provide you a porterbox for remote access.
> Please give me your ssh public key with gpg signed.
>
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Okay, thanks -- c
US.UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
> Versions of packages libhiredis-dev depends on:
> ii libhiredis0.10 0.11.0-3
>
> libhiredis-dev recommends no packages.
>
> libhiredis-dev suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Patch will be available in 0.4.1-2. Thanks for your help getting this
sorted out, Yunqiang!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Yunqiang Su wrote:
> dpkg-buildpackage -B
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Weird. Can I ask what commands you're using to bu
tation you provided!
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On 10/17, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Hi Alessandro,
>
> Hi,
>
> > I'm a long time Debian user who's eager to contribute. I have a fair bit
> of
> > experience with Debian p
ok.
That sounds great. I'm somewhat familiar with git-buildpackage, but
I'll take a look at pbuilder too.
Thanks again!
Cheers,
Tom
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On 10/20, Tom Lee wrote:
>> I'll attempt to update this bug to reflect its IT
to install them.
I've got a busy couple of days ahead of me, but I'll get onto this
later this week. :)
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On 10/21, Tom Lee wrote:
>> > You can join the collab-maint group following the proce
intend to
port that over for our existing set of packaging stuff later this
weekend too.
Anyway, let me know if you need anything more from me in relation to
the adoption "bug". :)
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> You probably saw the email, but my collab-maint me
should probably just be
>
>edd@max:~$ pkg-config hiredis --cflags
>-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
>edd@max:~$ pkg-config hiredis --libs
>-lhiredis
>edd@max:~$
>
> Thanks for maintaining it.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org |
This should be fixed in 0.11.0-3. I've requested an upload from
somebody with the necessary privileges, so hopefully we should see
this in unstable sometime soon.
Thanks again for the report!
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Thanks for the report -- I'll try to
ined from http://capnproto.org.
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #719782)
Regards,
Tom Lee
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
mp; see if
there's anything enlightening in there.
> I am unable to compile the package on a clean chroot. The unittests
> fail:
>
>
>
Weird -- I'll try that out myself & see if I can figure out what's going wrong.
Cheers,
Tom
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
s. Did you use something like pbuilder/cowbuilder? If
>> not, you should. But I don't see how this could lead to such a
>> backtrace.
>
> Same problem at home. I am building on AMD64. Please try in a sid
> pbuilder if you didn't.
> --
> Use data arrays to avoid
m guessing it's standard practice to
mount /proc when doing these chrooted builds?
And assuming the build servers are using a chroot, can I also assume
they will mount procfs on /proc prior to executing a build?
Either way, I'm going to mount /proc in my chroot & try again.
On Sun, A
18, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 18 août 2013 22:53 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
>> Ah, the Debug.Log hang seems like it might relate to a missing
>> /proc/self/exe symlink -- probably because I didn't mount the /proc
>> filesystem. Here's the relevant bit
ian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capnproto/capnproto_0.2.0-1.dsc
Thanks! Please let me know if I can do anything else to move this forward.
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
n Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 août 2013 01:34 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> > I'm thinking maybe I rip out the symbols file all together for now --
> > it sounds like the tooling isn't there for it yet. What do you think?
>
> Yes, just rem
ng deprecated & I should use --with python2 to "fix" it.
I'll try it again tomorrow to be sure, but is that safe enough to ignore?
Easy enough either way.
> - In debian/control, don't start the short description with a capital
>for capnproto.
>
>
Shall do.
Should be able to push a new build of this package tomorrow. Thanks again!
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 août 2013 09:56 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> >> - The hardening stuff does not seem to work correctly. Maybe you could
> >>just try with debhelper 9 and debian/compat to 9 to have them apply
> >>auto
follow up with a
0.2.1-1 build once 0.2.0-1 lands in unstable?
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 19 août 2013 11:46 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> >> The easiest way is to use Lintian (I use it with -viI).
> >>
> >>
> > Odd
Done -- 0.2.1-1 was just uploaded to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/capnproto
Cheers,
Tom
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 20 août 2013 06:48 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> > Alright, latest build of this package is up on mentors.debian.net:
Oops, just noticed I missed the leading upper-case 'T' for the capnproto
package. Fixed & pushing to mentors.d.n now.
Cheers,
Tom
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Done -- 0.2.1-1 was just uploaded to mentors:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/capn
e use of C++, which would place restrictions on
things like virtual functions being added & removed. The KDE guys have
documented some of this stuff:
http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C++
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦
Sorry, Debian Policy Manual :)
By the way, just uploaded the changelog modification to mentors, should
appear shortly. Nearly forgot to upload it.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 août 2013 09:02 CEST, Tom Lee :
>
> > Changelog squashed.
> >
&
. Be
> sure to update the changelog entry in your git repository too.
>
> There is no other problem with the packages for me, so I have uploaded
> it.
> --
> Debian package sponsoring guidelines:
> http://vincent.bernat.im/en/debian-package-sponsoring.html
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Hi Luke -- are you still working on this? I'd love to help make some
progress on this if you're swamped.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
ompile generate
==> ranch (compile)
==> cowboy (compile)
==> rel (compile)
==> (compile)
==> rel (generate)
tom@desktop:~/Source/ $
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
ained from http://redis.io/
Changes since the last upload:
* Fix incorrect --cflags & --libs in pkg-config file
Cheers,
Tom
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> owner 719286 gh...@debian.org
> tags 719286 pending
> kthxbye
>
> [ also CCing the RFS bug ]
>
> On sab, ago 10, 2013 at 09:32:29 -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Hey Alessandro,
>
> Hi,
>
> > Not
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Tom Lee
* Package name: capnproto
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Kenton Varda
* URL : http://kentonv.github.io/capnproto/index.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Cap'n Proto: a fast
o include the
> CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
>
> For further information see:
>
> [0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-7892
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-7892
>
> Regards,
> Salvatore
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
technically-correct" solution?
Thanks again for flagging this.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder Salvatore -- I'll get this sorted out.
>
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>
>
Cheers for the review Mattia! I'll look into all of this. A few comments:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> ...
> * d/patches/01_makefile_fixes.patch:
> + Probably use += instead of ?= in the first CFLAGS?
> + I'd rather use install(1) instead of cp(1)
> + Really for
low:
>> [ FAILED ] AsyncUnixTest.SignalWithValue
>> [ FAILED ] AsyncUnixTest.SignalWithPointerValue
>
> I will do further investigating.
>
> Best Regards,
> Dejan
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
n EdgeRouter Pro (mips-aql-02),
> these two test failed:
>> [ FAILED ] 2 tests, listed below:
>> [ FAILED ] AsyncUnixTest.SignalWithValue
>> [ FAILED ] AsyncUnixTest.SignalWithPointerValue
>
> I will do further investigating.
>
> Best Regards,
> Dejan
--
Tom L
d if we saw the write
notification fire multiple times (once per PIPE_BUF bytes read). Even
if that is happening, I feel like we're testing the intended behavior.
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Control: tags +confirmed
>
> Dejan, Arturo, thanks for loo
Just noticed that the description in the patch itself misleading --
please disregard that. My earlier email represents my best
understanding of the issue.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +patch
>
> Alrighty, potential patch is attached. Can you folks t
github issue comment [0].
>
> regards.
>
> [0]
> https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/issues/204#issuecomment-126958876
>
> --
> Arturo Borrero González
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the "spin" package:
* Package name: spin
Version : 6.4.5
Upstream Author : Gerard J. Holzmann
* URL : http://spinroot.com
* License : BSD-3-clause
Section :
Great, got it -- thanks Paul. Uploading to mentors again now.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
>
> > N.B. no watchfile is present due to the naming strategy of the upstream
> tarball:
> > uscan interprets
ckages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will
> resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. You may
> also register in the BTS that the other package is affected by the bug.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andreas
>
> PS: for more information about the detection of file overwrite errors
> of this kind see https://qa.debian.org/dose/file-overwrites.html
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Thanks Artur! I'll land this when I get a few moments spare.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Still looking for a sponsor for the spin verification tool. I added a
spin-dbg binary package to the mix earlier today:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/spin
Builds fine in pbuilder, is lint clean, etc. Appreciate reviews too!
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
; APT prefers testing-updates
> APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
test] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/buildd/hiredis-0.11.0'
> debian/rules:13: recipe for target 'build' failed
> make: *** [build] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> E: Failed autobuilding of package
>
&
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello, I'd like to request a transition slot from the release team.
The libhiredis SONAME changed in the latest release from upstream,
indicating ABI-incompatible changes to the library.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 15/05/15 06:10, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hello, I'd like t
Confirmed the webdis segfault is due to an ABI change.
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>
>> On 15/05/15 06:10, Tom Lee wrote:
>> > Package: release.debian.org
>> > Sev
Cheers,
Tom
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2015-05-16 12:23, Tom Lee wrote:
>
>> Confirmed the webdis segfault is due to an ABI change.
>>
>
> That'll need sorting out before the transition
s the
best way to handle this sort of situation. gbp's support for filtering may
also be an option.
libhiredis0.13 and libhiredis-dev 0.13.1-1 have been uploaded to the
experimental distribution if you'd like to reproduce this for yourself.
Cheers,
Tom
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Control: block -1 by 785476
Bug raised against webdis:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785476
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> I'm assuming this doesn't change anything with respect to the transition,
> but upon further investigation in
a
> plan to close this out? It sounds like a solution is very near, hopefully
> to the satisfaction of both the maintainers and release coordinators.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim.
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Thanks for reporting this John. I somehow overlooked this in prepping
0.5.2-1 thinking that upstream had fixed it, but obviously they're only
going to be applying a fix for mips & not hppa.
I've opened a PR to get this fixed upstream:
https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/pull/200
Sorry for
I managed to successfully build
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/capnproto/capnproto_0.5.2-1.dsc
against experimental/GCC-5 using pbuilder.
Not sure if you're actively attempting test rebuilds every so often, but
feel free to try for yourself when 0.5.2-1 hits unstable.
--
*To
-02.
Full details + patch:
https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/blob/master/security-advisories/2015-03-02-0-c%2B%2B-integer-overflow.md
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
2015-03-02.
Full details + patch:
https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/blob/master/security-advisories/2015-03-02-1-c%2B%2B-integer-underflow.md
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
ll details + patch:
https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/blob/master/security-advisories/2015-03-02-2-all-cpu-amplification.md
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
-05.
Full details + patch:
https://github.com/sandstorm-io/capnproto/blob/master/security-advisories/2015-03-05-0-c%2B%2B-addl-cpu-amplification.md
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
rent version of capnproto FTBFS on armel and
> armhf due to a segmentation fault in one of the tests. This prevents
> the new version of migrating to testing as it is a regression compared
> to the version in testing.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Niels
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
OK ] Capability.DynamicClient (1 ms)
[ RUN ] Capability.DynamicClientInheritance
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2015-03-30 04:30, Tom Lee wrote:
> > Hey Niels,
> >
> > Understood. Hard to see exactly what's going on here because we
put: Assertion `redisGetReply(c,
> (void*)&replies[i]) == 0' failed.
>
> See
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hiredis&arch=powerpc&ver=0.13.1-2&stamp=1434137918
> for a full log.
>
> Emilio
--
Tom Lee / http://tomlee.co / @tglee
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libjemalloc1
Version: 3.6.0-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Running the hiredis tests on powerpc causes redis-server to crash due to
what appears to be strange memory corruption issues. Upon further
investigation on the partch.debian.org porterbox, I've managed to
convince myself
?
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Steven Chamberlain
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tom Lee wrote:
> > I've had some trouble getting kfreebsd up and running in a VM
>
> Christoph has created a prebuilt VM image of jessie-kfreebsd, if that
> helps you:
> https://people.debian.or
rop it on here for
folks to verify.
I'd still be interested to know how I can resize partitions on kfreebsd for
future reference :)
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Thanks Steven, that was really helpful. Got Cristoph's image up & running
> in VirtualBox wit
e to do the
validation of tv_usec/tv_sec never gets executed.
I'll try to get a few patches together for all this later in the week.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Alrighty, despite my fdisk woes a bit of "printf debugging" has revealed
> the test failure
7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
> This was a much deeper rabbit hole than I expected, but I think I've
> worked it out. Most of the notes below are for my own benefit, but happy to
> elaborate if folks have any questions about the details. TL;DR is fmacros.h
> fails to detect
>
> Yes, that's true.
>
> I updated my pbuilder environment and the ICE is gone and the package
> is built just fine.
>
> --
> Arturo Borrero González
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
;
> Kernel: Linux 3.17.8+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
> en_CA.utf8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Package: capnproto
Version: 0.5.3-1
mips, powerpc, hppa appear to be affected, possibly others -- still waiting
on buildds after the most recent upload. Suspect it's related to
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/10/159 but yet to confirm.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twi
: unimplemented:
setsockopt(fds[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, &small, sizeof(small)):
Protocol not available" thrown in the test fixture's constructor.
[ FAILED ] SerializeAsyncTest.WriteAsyncEvenSegmentCount (0 ms)
Haven't seen these errors manifest on other archs yet, though still waiting
on buildd for some.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Tags: +confirmed +pending
A fix for this is forthcoming.
n.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hiredis&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=0.13.1-2&stamp=1434139411
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hiredis&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=0.13.1-2&stamp=1434138443
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Will do Martin -- thank you!
On Jun 25, 2015 9:55 AM, "Martin Michlmayr" wrote:
> * Tom Lee [2015-05-03 02:34]:
> > Not sure if you're actively attempting test rebuilds every so often, but
> > feel free to try for yourself when 0.5.2-1 hits unstable.
>
&g
Apologies for the delay on this, it slipped my mind. I'm tied up this week,
but I'll try to get a fix together sometime next week.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
n /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules are not used anymore.
>
> Please provide a symlink/copy of those in /usr/share/cmake-3.0/Modules.
>
> Cheers,
> Felix
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
available here: https://github.com/thomaslee/spin-debian
Initial indications are the packaging will be relatively simple with some
minimal patches.
Further reading:
http://spinroot.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPIN_model_checker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promela
http://spinroot.com/spin/s
g a new package uploaded with the pbuilder
fixes & nocheck support.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:45:04 -0800 Tom Lee wrote:
> > Alrighty, patch applied & pbuilder's clean. Now just waiting on
> Alessandro
> > to
6:55 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 30.11.2014, 00:21 -0800 schrieb Tom Lee:
>
> > > > Also, I feel like the "serious" severity is overstating the issue
> > > > given that 0.11.0-4 builds fine in buildd/sbuild. Alessan
2014 at 11:00 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 10:51:56 -0800, Tom Lee wrote:
>
> > Talked this over with the release team on #debian-release,
>
> Except that noone who responded is a member of the release team :)
>
> Cheers,
> gregor
>
> --
>
able; urgency=medium
+
+ * Disable a network test failing in pbuilder (closes: #770648)
+
+ -- Tom Lee Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:17:31 -0800
+
hiredis (0.11.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Symlinks for cmake 3.0 (closes: #758548)
diff -Nru hiredis-0.11.0/debian/patches/04_disable-network-tests.
rror when the port is not open: ");
> > #v-
> >
> > But maybe there are better ways to fix this.
>
> That would make the test kinda useless, but I guess it's no worse than
> disabling
> it completely.
>
>
I don't mind this approach if we call out the fact the test was skipped
rather than silently "passed", but at that point it's providing the same
value as a test that's been completely disabled ... keeping Tobias'
original patch for now.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
cting as a sponsor for uploads? If not, I'll need to ask around.
Cheers,
Tom
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
27;s not supposed to be any such type, so the problem
> presumably lies in code generation. Could you please take a look?
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
> http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/
> finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
Thanks for the heads-up Jaromir, 0.6.1-1 is in the NEW queue and should
land in sid sometime over the next few days/weeks.
producing the issue is trivial on my end when a
kernel is "bad".
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Tom Lee wrote:
> Also potentially relevant: kworker/0:0 has 421h on-cpu time reported per
> htop (the TIME+ column) and top. /proc//stat output for PID=4
> (kworker/0:0) vs PID=63
Oops, somehow missed those follow-ups. Thanks, I'll catch up.
Have you tried booting one of the newer kernel versions from power-off?
I'll be sure to give that a go, thanks.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 17:52 -0800, Tom Lee wrote
27;s possible. I think I built my
"good" vanilla 4.9 kernel using the debian 4.6 config. Perhaps in addition
the booting-from-power-off, maybe worth my time to try another vanilla 4.9
build using the debian 4.9 config to see if things get miserable again.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM
pn firmware-misc-nonfree
pn firmware-myricom
pn firmware-netxen
pn firmware-qlogic
ii firmware-realtek 20160824-1
pn firmware-samsung
pn firmware-siano
pn firmware-ti-connectivity
pn xen-hypervisor
-- no debconf information
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
c//stat.
4.6.x continues to be perfect with respect to both overall performance and
the correctness of /proc//stat.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Sun, 2016-11-06 at 00:02 -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> [...]
> > Downgrading t
the only process with on-cpu stats
reported (forgive the shell abuse, quick and dirty):
$ for pid in $(ls /proc | awk '/^[0-9]*$/'); do [ -d /proc/$pid ] && awk
'$14 != "0" { print $2 }' /proc/$pid/stat; done
(kworker/0:0)
$
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 2:12 PM,
idable if
we simply move those IDLs over to the capnproto binary package.
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
include Dmitry's patch?
>
> Cheers,
> tony
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
> Hi,
>
> I attached a commit for you Git repository to record the changes of my NMU.
> BTW, it would be easier if you would decide to maintain capnproto on
>https://salsa.debian.org/debian
>
> Hope this helps, Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
--
*Tom
; : Chris Lamb
> `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
>`-
>
--
*Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee <http://twitter.com/tglee>
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
