Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

I didn't say "required". I said that it is the usual (and recommended) practice from packagers. On the desert island, you can patch rust packages as much as you want without forwarding anything upstream. Le 19/07/2022 à 14:01, Damian Yerrick a écrit : Requiring work to be done upstream

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

Requiring work to be done upstream fails the desert island test, as described by Thomas Bushnell in > A good test case for whether a license is free (for issues like this) > is whether a disconnected group of people on a desert island

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:16 AM Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Thanks for bringing it to our attention, I have consulted with the Rust > foundation, we have agreed a change, we think this change solves it. ah! we may have

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

i've opened up a second bug for gcc because it is also about to become affected, not in the same way, but in a worse way. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015242 whilst 50% of DFSG 2 is violated by the Rust Trademark (as it stands, with the new clauses), gcc is in an even worse

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

Distributing a modified version of the Rust programming language or the Cargo package manager, provided that the modifications are limited to: * porting the software to a different architecture * fixing local paths * adding patches that have been released upstream

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

Thanks for bringing it to our attention, I have consulted with the Rust foundation, we have agreed a change, we think this change solves it. See https://foundation.rust-lang.org/policies/logo-policy-and-media-guide/ for the updated policy. Cheers, Sylvestre Le 27/06/2022 à 13:52, lkcl a

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

everything is "fine" as long as: 1) the Mozilla Foundation acts reasonably and non-discriminatorily (FRAND applies to Trademarks just as it applies to patent Licensing) 2) the Mozilla Foundation does not appreciate quite how much power it actually has under Trademark Law. given that this is

Bug#1013920: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1013920: rust-all: Debian violating Rust Trademark (as serious a situation as "iceweasel")

Hello I don't think it is a big deal but I will chat with some people on the Rust side about this. Cheers, Sylvestre (who managed the iceweasel/firefox thing) Le 27/06/2022 à 13:52, lkcl a écrit : Package: rust-all Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1