On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 18:53:01 +0900 Junichi Uekawa wrote:
/usr/bin/wine64-stable fails because of missing files.
Should /usr/bin/wine64-stable be there at all?
I guess having just package wine64 without package wine
installed should also work?
Then /usr/bin/wine64-stable would be needed.
On 12.02.23 10:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The -stable suffix was added for the Debian alternatives system. While
I don't expect an issue with adding an /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
link, I wonder if the whole issue is really a bug (still probably a
regression, which I can't comment on since I'm
>
> The -stable suffix was added for the Debian alternatives system. While
> I don't expect an issue with adding an /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
> link, I wonder if the whole issue is really a bug (still probably a
> regression, which I can't comment on since I'm not involved in current
>
> [Ex-maintainer here]
>
> The -stable suffix was added for the Debian alternatives system. While
> I don't expect an issue with adding an /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
> link, I wonder if the whole issue is really a bug (still probably a
> regression, which I can't comment on since I'm not
On 07.02.23 14:22, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
if one creates this wine64-stable just as a link to wine64,
then `wine64-stable wineboot` would start to work.
# ln -s wine64 /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
Kind regards,
Bernhard
(rr)
692 execv( argv[1], argv + 1 );
(rr)
Dear Maintainer,
if one creates this wine64-stable just as a link to wine64,
then `wine64-stable wineboot` would start to work.
# ln -s wine64 /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable
Kind regards,
Bernhard
(rr)
692 execv( argv[1], argv + 1 );
(rr) print argv[1]
$2 = 0x7e848400
`wine64 wineboot` runs, /usr/lib/wine/wine64 is there.
`wine64-stable wineboot` fails, /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable is not there.
according to strace:
execve("/usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable", ["/usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable",
"wineboot"], 0x7e641390 /* 21 vars */) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
7 matches
Mail list logo
