No particular reason, AFAIK. If you decide to put together a samba-utils
package, please make sure that everything you put in it is both useful, and
functional on Debian. :)
And secure. I would love an audit of backticks in that code...
I think this may be why RH doesn't ship some
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 03:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:24:00AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Chris M. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 11/18/05, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug submitter in #231806 suggest that we at least document
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:24:00AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Chris M. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 11/18/05, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug submitter in #231806 suggest that we at least document why
scripts in sources/scripts are *not* packaged in
The bug submitter in #231806 suggest that we at least document why
scripts in sources/scripts are *not* packaged in Debian packages.
He mentions findsmb in the bug report, but this actually is similar
for all utilities in source/scripts such as smbtar.
I think it would be worth adding some words
On 11/18/05, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug submitter in #231806 suggest that we at least document why
scripts in sources/scripts are *not* packaged in Debian packages.
He mentions findsmb in the bug report, but this actually is similar
for all utilities in source/scripts
Quoting Chris M. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On 11/18/05, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug submitter in #231806 suggest that we at least document why
scripts in sources/scripts are *not* packaged in Debian packages.
He mentions findsmb in the bug report, but this
6 matches
Mail list logo
