Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was just a matter of waiting. Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed

Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: Hello, Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was just a matter of waiting. Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed

Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Enrico Zini
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered: Step 1: libtagcoll-dev Step 2: tagcoll, tagcolledit, libapt-front-dev (since they statically

Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Version: 1.5.2+b2 On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:34:42PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 12:41:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:18:53AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: So, it seems that there are some recompiles to be triggered: Step 1: libtagcoll-dev

Bug#341945: Investigation of the bug

2005-12-10 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello, Sorry to have been lingering on this bug: on Igloo's buildd report I saw that some of the packages were still rebuilding and I thought it was just a matter of waiting. Today I investigated a bit more. The problem is indeed connected to the C++ allocator thing, and the recompile was