Bug#437503: Valgrind claims illegal instruction in ld-2.6.1.so

2007-08-13 Thread Florian Weimer
* Aurelien Jarno: >> vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0x66 0x66 0x66 > This is very probably the reason 2. as programs are running correctly > without valgrind. Yeah, as long as the total instruction length remains below 14 bytes or so, multiple opcode prefixes such as 0x66 are a

Bug#437503: Valgrind claims illegal instruction in ld-2.6.1.so

2007-08-12 Thread Aurelien Jarno
reassign 437503 valgrind thanks Marko Lindqvist a écrit : > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.6.1-1 > > For a couple of days valgrind has refused to run any programs. This > started when /lib/ld-2.6.1.so was updated. > > ==19756== > vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0x66 0x66 0x66 > ==

Bug#437503: Valgrind claims illegal instruction in ld-2.6.1.so

2007-08-12 Thread Marko Lindqvist
Package: libc6 Version: 2.6.1-1 For a couple of days valgrind has refused to run any programs. This started when /lib/ld-2.6.1.so was updated. ==19756== vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0x66 0x66 0x66 ==19756== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x4016321. ==19756== Yo