Bug#469397: Bug #469397: ITP: xbmc -- XBMC Media Center

2012-02-19 Thread Aron Xu
Hi Andres,

If the package is ready, please ask for review on debian-mentors
and/or pkg-multimedia.

-- 
Regards,
Aron Xu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#469397: ITP: xbmc -- XBMC Media Center

2012-01-16 Thread Andres Mejia
All packaging is done at https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc-packaging


Bug#469397: ITP: xbmc -- XBMC Media Center (status update)

2010-11-25 Thread Andres Mejia
Just a small update on what's going on.

I have given updates to any possible licensing issues at [1]. In short, I fixed 
numerous possible licensing issues myself upstream. The libraries libXBMS and 
UnrarXLib are the only issues that currently exist which are still an issue 
with licensing. At least for Debian, XBMC won't include those two libraries.

Also, I'm not going to worry about including the entire source tree of XBMC 
for Debian packages. I'll just be including the minimum to build the Debian 
packages.

There is the issue of needing to use system libraries instead of internal 
libraries whenever possible. This is especially true for XBMC's use of Python 
and FFMpeg libraries. Because XBMC depends on functionality where libc 
function calls are overridden (functions like fopen(), fdopen(), etc.), XBMC 
now needs to override libc function calls inside a system library as well. 
This is especially true for the two mentioned libraries above. See [2] for 
more info.

Aside from that, I don't see any other issue with XBMC being suitable for 
Debian.

1. http://trac.xbmc.org/ticket/7983
2. http://trac.xbmc.org/ticket/8658

-- 
Regards,
Andres Mejia



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org