Matthew \mentor\ Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 22:07 +0800, Glenn Saberton wrote:
I think it would be beneficial to all if the people that are
experiencing problems with the current debian madwifi package with the
current wpasupplicant package, that they would actually
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 22:07 +0800, Glenn Saberton wrote:
I think it would be beneficial to all if the people that are
experiencing problems with the current debian madwifi package with the
current wpasupplicant package, that they would actually supply some
debug info to the relevant upstream
tag 487585 help
stop
kelmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've put forward my opinion already, and I'll stand by it. If enough
convincing
arguments are put forward by people that the madwifi driver interface
(private,
non-standard WPA interface, requiring a copy of source code that must be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
tag 487585 help
stop
kelmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've put forward my opinion already, and I'll stand by it. If enough
convincing
arguments are put forward by people that the madwifi driver interface
(private,
Hi Santiago,
On Monday 23 June 2008 06:39:26 Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The short story seems to be that an atheros card running madwifi sometimes
fails to authenticate when using wpasupplicant -D wext, while it always
I have the same problem . So I fully agree with Santiago Garcia
Mantinan that madwifi driver should be enabled in wpa_supplicant.
Regards
Maciek Kaliszewski
--
Sprawdz, czy jestes lepszy, niz Leo!
kliknij
Package: wpasupplicant
Version: 0.6.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The short story seems to be that an atheros card running madwifi sometimes
fails to authenticate when using wpasupplicant -D wext, while it always
works if run with -D madwifi.
The long story is this:
I have two computers, one runs
7 matches
Mail list logo
