Bug#493492: FTBFS: Unknown architecture: Check singuname.sh
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:53:48PM -0400, Timothy G Abbott wrote: This singuname check does seem pretty horrible. (A) making the makefiles do different things on windows/osx (B) testing whether the system uses ELF (C) a few old compatability checks I'll upload a minimal fix that just sets the SINGUNAME to Unknown-Linux for Linux versions that Singular doesn't understand for now, since I think that will fix the build problems. kfreebsd* and hurd will probably work with that too: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=singular ie. both use ELF. I'll also contact upstream about improving the situation to test for ELF support and these other features directly in future releases. Thanks. Thanks for the report, -Tim Abbott On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Riku Voipio wrote: Package: singular Version: 3-0-4-3.dfsg-1 Severity: important build fails on many archs with: checking uname for singular... unknown configure: error: Unknown architecture: Check singuname.sh This is completly broken and against the test for features, not for systems. philosophy of autoconf. Looking at where the singuname result is used in configure.in, any generic modern linux system should be sufficent to fill the requirements... -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493492: FTBFS: Unknown architecture: Check singuname.sh
Package: singular Version: 3-0-4-3.dfsg-1 Severity: important build fails on many archs with: checking uname for singular... unknown configure: error: Unknown architecture: Check singuname.sh This is completly broken and against the test for features, not for systems. philosophy of autoconf. Looking at where the singuname result is used in configure.in, any generic modern linux system should be sufficent to fill the requirements... -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#493492: FTBFS: Unknown architecture: Check singuname.sh
This singuname check does seem pretty horrible. (A) making the makefiles do different things on windows/osx (B) testing whether the system uses ELF (C) a few old compatability checks I'll upload a minimal fix that just sets the SINGUNAME to Unknown-Linux for Linux versions that Singular doesn't understand for now, since I think that will fix the build problems. I'll also contact upstream about improving the situation to test for ELF support and these other features directly in future releases. Thanks for the report, -Tim Abbott On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Riku Voipio wrote: Package: singular Version: 3-0-4-3.dfsg-1 Severity: important build fails on many archs with: checking uname for singular... unknown configure: error: Unknown architecture: Check singuname.sh This is completly broken and against the test for features, not for systems. philosophy of autoconf. Looking at where the singuname result is used in configure.in, any generic modern linux system should be sufficent to fill the requirements... -- rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
