Daniel Schröter wrote:
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/thunderbird20.html#thunderbird2.0.0.21
More Security Bugs are fixed in 2.0.0.22:
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/thunderbird20.html#thunderbird2.0.0.22
Why we don't get an update for unstable?
Hi,
before there is a version 3.0 it would IMHO be better to have a version
2.0.0.21 fast to fix the security bugs mentioned here:
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/thunderbird20.html#thunderbird2.0.0.21
Later on your can unhurriedly build version 3.0.
Bye
Daniel
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:44:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
I'd prefer to see in sid 3.0 beta2, in the hopes that
having more testers during beta will improve the the
eventual release, while letting us get rid of xulrunner 1.8
codebase.
I'd prefer to see in sid 3.0 beta2, in the hopes that
having more testers during beta will improve the the
eventual release, while letting us get rid of xulrunner 1.8
codebase.
http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/3.0b2/
--
rm -rf only sounds scary if you don't have backups
--
Package: icedove
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
please upgrade to 2.0.0.21.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To
5 matches
Mail list logo
