I got the same problem right now and was going to file a bug report. I think
that if it is distributed as an i386 package it should run on any i386
processor, unless there is a good reason not to. I agree with Torsten that if
it is too troublesome to keep both versions, priority should be given
Hi Chun,
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 12:11:07PM +0800, Chun Tian (binghe) wrote:
Why not build CMUCL by yourself, just not use Debian pre-compiled
package here?
If I want to build my software manually, I'd either use Gentoo or Linux
from Scratch. What's the point of a binary distribution if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Torsten,
I had hoped not to see an email like yours.
The issue is that cmucl with this new release will compile to two
different fasl formats: for x86 or for sse2.
I was going to fix the scripts to handle this correctly but then I
dawned on
Package: cmucl
Version: 19f-20090312-1
Severity: important
Hey there,
While trying the examples of my Practical Common Lisp book, I wanted to
install cmucl on my Debian system.
Unfortunately, it does not support my CPU as it seems:
pulsar:/home/torsten# apt-get install cmucl
Reading state
4 matches
Mail list logo
