Bug#606719: Normal kernel being before the Xen hypervisor in Squeeze

2010-12-30 Thread Łukasz Oleś
Hello, On Sunday 19 December 2010 12:47:15 Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:48:56AM +0100, Thomas Schmidt wrote: Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 14:18 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand: For me, it's a grave regression that can put a production environment into big troubles, and it

Bug#606719: Normal kernel being before the Xen hypervisor in Squeeze

2010-12-12 Thread Thomas Schmidt
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 14:18 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand: I'm saying this is not RC in my opinion, it's wishlist. The rest is up to the grub maintainers. Cheers, Julien For me, it's a grave regression that can put a production environment into big troubles, and it would

Bug#606719: Normal kernel being before the Xen hypervisor in Squeeze

2010-12-12 Thread Philipp Kern
Thomas, am Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:48:56AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: I also agree that this needs to be resolved before the release and in my opinion this bugs severity should be at least important, if not critical because it will break Xen dom0 functionality of existing systems

Bug#606719: Normal kernel being before the Xen hypervisor in Squeeze

2010-12-12 Thread Thomas Schmidt
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 13:10 +0100 schrieb Philipp Kern: are grub1 installations (which were the default for Lenny AFAIK) auto-upgraded to grub2 during the dist-upgrade? If not, it shouldn't break existing Xen dom0s? At some point during the release cycle on all my testing machines,

Bug#606719: Normal kernel being before the Xen hypervisor in Squeeze

2010-12-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/12/2010 01:03 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 16:51:03 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 05:40:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 00:19:34 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: I was tempted to write a RC bug report here. Please