Hi all,
On Sa 02 Jun 2012 20:53:10 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
We would have to import latest upstream on top of that
Well, unless we all agree to reset git repo, this is impossible to do. I
like to do it
+1 from me. However, as Fathi is ITP holder, he may have the last word.
I know.
Hi Osamu, hi all,
On Sa 02 Jun 2012 20:53:10 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:58:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Osamu,
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Osamu, hi all,
On Sa 02 Jun 2012 20:53:10 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:58:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Osamu,
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:58:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Osamu,
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
packaging folder)
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
packaging folder)
http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
This is one of them. Ubuntu package history is another one.
We would have to
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:57:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
packaging folder)
http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
This is one of
Hi all,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:57:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
packaging folder)
http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
Hi Osamu,
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
packaging folder)
http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
This is one of them. Ubuntu package history is another one.
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:36:12PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
old Fathi's version and made many improvements.
thanks for pinging us! I agree,
Hi,
On Do 31 Mai 2012 15:55:28 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:36:12PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
old Fathi's version and made
Dear Fathi Boudra
What they agree or not agree is not relevant, but the facts are relevant!
To give you a few real examples:
You won't be able to access the following image with your browsers,
because they use obsolete and illegal derivations of libjpeg:
For information, it looks like not all of libjpeg8 is actually
implemented in libjpeg-turbo, ref:
http://libjpeg-turbo.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libjpeg-turbo/trunk/README-turbo.txt
In particular:
libjpeg v7 and v8 Features:
---
Fully supported:
-- cjpeg: Separate
Hi Fathi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 06:06:07 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding gu...@jpegclub.org wrote:
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Everything is said in the README:
There are currently
Hi all,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Mike Gabriel
mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de wrote:
Hi Fathi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 06:06:07 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding gu...@jpegclub.org
wrote:
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:58:40AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Bill Allombert
bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr wrote:
I am surprised you do not count Debian as a major distro.
Does libjpeg-progs works correctly with LJT ?
That's my point. Debian is the
Hello Mathieu
I fully agree with Fathi, no political discussion via an Debian ITP in BTS.
Well the issues were about:
1. legal issues
2. ABI compatibility
You are right, these are more substantial than just political issues.
(1) If any part of the source code for this software is
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:09:12AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Fathi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 06:06:07 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding gu...@jpegclub.org wrote:
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Hi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 11:21:18 CEST Bill Allombert wrote:
I fully agree with Fathi, no political discussion via an Debian ITP in BTS.
Guido and me have been dragged in this bug log against our will. You
can hardly
blame us for answering.
Not blaming anyone...
Whether a package is
Hi,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:20:21PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 11:21:18 CEST Bill Allombert wrote:
...
Let's focus on topic: ITP = Intent_To_Package for libjpeg-turbo
Whether a package is correctly licensed is certainly relevant to an ITP.
libjpeg-turbo is
Hi Bill,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
Does libjpeg-turbo8 implement the full v8 API ? As far as I understand some
functions
are stub.
I'm not sure it's relevant anymore. All major distro have switched to LJT.
Ubuntu is using it by default and no issues were found
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
old Fathi's version and made many improvements.
thanks for pinging us! I agree, libjpeg-turbo has to be in Wheezy!!!
Fathi, please send us a notice what
Hi Fathi,
On Di 29 Mai 2012 18:36:12 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
Sounds like many people are interested. LJT is a good candidate for
collab-maint on git.debian.org :)
Good idea. Please relocate the packaging Git so that we can work
together on this.
Greets,
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike
Guido,
Sorry to make you jump in the middle of this thread. We are
discussing compatibilities issues in between LJT (lib JPEG Turbo) and
the official IJG distribution. The whole thread can be seen here:
http://bugs.debian.org/612341
Do you have any particular comments on LJT ? From a pure
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:27:35PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
Does libjpeg-turbo8 implement the full v8 API ? As far as I understand some
functions
are stub.
I'm not sure it's relevant anymore. All major distro have
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Everything is said in the README:
There are currently distributions in circulation containing the name
libjpeg which claim to be a derivative or fork of the original
libjpeg, but don't have the features
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Bill Allombert
bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr wrote:
I am surprised you do not count Debian as a major distro.
Does libjpeg-progs works correctly with LJT ?
That's my point. Debian is the only one that haven't switched yet :)
Yes, LJT works with
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding gu...@jpegclub.org wrote:
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Everything is said in the README:
There are currently distributions in circulation containing the name
libjpeg which claim to
Hi there,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi all,
On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 03:34:39AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi all,
On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January. Nothing
Hi,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:43:39AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
...
CCed: Bill who is libjpeg maintainer.
As far as I know libjpeg is not really concerned here. virtualgl only
links to libturbojpeg. So there really are two issues in a single
report:
1. optimized jpeg
Hi,
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/612341
In the meantime, Ubuntu package was updated to generate -dev etc.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo
libjpeg-turbo (1.1.90+svn733-0ubuntu4)
Hi all,
On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/612341
In the meantime, Ubuntu package was updated to generate -dev etc.
Hi,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi all,
On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/612341
In the meantime, Ubuntu package
33 matches
Mail list logo
