Andrew Pollock, le Wed 11 Jan 2012 22:12:11 -0800, a écrit :
I'm expecting to have a face-to-face meeting with the ISC DHCP folks next
week,
and the Hurd situation is one of the topics of discussion. If the stakeholders
from debian-hurd want me to convey anything in particular, then now's the
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 23:45:24 +0100, a écrit :
Andrew Pollock, le Wed 11 Jan 2012 22:12:11 -0800, a écrit :
I'm expecting to have a face-to-face meeting with the ISC DHCP folks next
week,
and the Hurd situation is one of the topics of discussion. If the
stakeholders
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:42:06AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 23:45:24 +0100, a écrit :
Andrew Pollock, le Wed 11 Jan 2012 22:12:11 -0800, a écrit :
I'm expecting to have a face-to-face meeting with the ISC DHCP folks next
week,
and the Hurd
Andrew Pollock, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 15:57:50 -0800, a écrit :
- the PATH_MAX fix, which they _can_ check on GNU/Linux, since GNU/Linux
uses glibc.
One of the concerns with this patch was that it was conditional not on the
Hurd OS, but on glibc being in use. I think they'd rather see this be
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:12:15AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Andrew Pollock, le Sat 21 Jan 2012 15:57:50 -0800, a écrit :
- the PATH_MAX fix, which they _can_ check on GNU/Linux, since GNU/Linux
uses glibc.
One of the concerns with this patch was that it was conditional not on the
My comments prefixed with - below.
Same reply as before, strange behaviour indeed.
Forwarded Message
From: Cathy Almond via RT dhcp-b...@isc.org
Reply-to: dhcp-b...@isc.org
To: svante.sign...@telia.com
Cc: apoll...@debian.org, samuel.thiba...@gnu.org
Subject: [ISC-Bugs #25979]
On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 22:12 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:20:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
So far our (Debian's) communications with dhcpd upstream on this topic
seem to be lacking in this area. If you like I would be happy to
review your next submissiosn to
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Svante Signell writes ([Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp
patch in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]):
Dear Debian/Hurd, GNU/Hurd and Debian-devel people. This arrived today.
Any ideas on how to proceed
Svante Signell writes (Re: [Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp
patch in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]):
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Where can I find the detailed explanation of why this patch is
required and how it works to fix the problems
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:20 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Svante Signell writes (Re: [Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp
patch in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]):
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:15 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Where can I find the detailed explanation of why
Svante Signell writes (Re: [Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp
patch in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]):
[ stuff ]
It looks like I'm not expressing myself well enough. Or at any rate,
I'm not getting through. Perhaps someone else would like to try to
explain ?
I'll have
Svante Signell writes ([Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp patch
in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]):
Dear Debian/Hurd, GNU/Hurd and Debian-devel people. This arrived today.
Any ideas on how to proceed? Is it possible to create a Hurd-specific
fork of the latest ISC-DHCP
Dear Debian/Hurd, GNU/Hurd and Debian-devel people. This arrived today.
Any ideas on how to proceed? Is it possible to create a Hurd-specific
fork of the latest ISC-DHCP release? DHCP is an essential package in the
Debian Installer.
Is it possible to do something at Debian level? The text below
13 matches
Mail list logo
