Hi,
One simple solution would be to run the script under the symlink path
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/ppworker.py.
Then /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/ would be added (again) to sys.path,
which is harmless.
FWIW that would not help apparently since
pp already does that:
DEBUG4:
* Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com, 2013-01-22, 12:28:
One simple solution would be to run the script under the symlink path
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/ppworker.py.
Then /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/ would be added (again) to sys.path,
which is harmless.
FWIW that would not help
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com, 2013-01-22, 12:28:
One simple solution would be to run the script under the symlink
path /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/ppworker.py.
Then /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/ would be added (again) to
sys.path, which
* Yaroslav Halchenko deb...@onerussian.com, 2013-01-22, 13:04:
if __name__ == __main__:
# add the directory with ppworker.py to the path
-sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(__file__))
Removing this line would be still needed.
yeah -- although -- shouldn't it be benign since it just
if I do not hear from Sandro against it -- I will patch/test/upload
within few days
please don't upload, but i'd surely welcome a patch.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Sandro Tosi wrote:
if I do not hear from Sandro against it -- I will patch/test/upload
within few days
please don't upload, but i'd surely welcome a patch.
As you wish -- a complete debdiff patch is attached -- it would be great
to get it into wheezy, thus changelog
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
deb...@onerussian.com wrote:
As you wish -- a complete debdiff patch is attached -- it would be great
to get it into wheezy, thus changelog for unstable
Thanks! I don't know if RT would approve it - would you mind asking
for a future unblock?
7 matches
Mail list logo
