On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:48:48AM +, peter green wrote:
I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product
manager, and she actually said end of February, although she wasn't a
betting woman.
So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. If no 4.2.4
El 7 de març de 2012 20:15, Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org ha escrit:
I just heard back that they're running behind schedule by about a month, so
I'll proceed with making a release with a stripped tarball to address
#645760
Please don't forget 643569.
--
Robert Millan
--
To
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:28:48PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
El 7 de març de 2012 20:15, Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org ha escrit:
I just heard back that they're running behind schedule by about a month, so
I'll proceed with making a release with a stripped tarball to address
#645760
I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product
manager, and she actually said end of February, although she wasn't a
betting woman.
So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. If no 4.2.4
upstream release has been made by March 1, I will check in with
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:48:48AM +, peter green wrote:
I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product
manager, and she actually said end of February, although she wasn't a
betting woman.
So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. If no 4.2.4
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 21:17:42 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I just reviewed the most recent email I exchanged with the ISC product
manager, and she actually said end of February, although she wasn't a
betting woman.
So let's wait until March 1 to take stock of the situation. If no 4.2.4
Zumbi: please call off the NMU. I'm now in dialog with the maintainer.
See my other email. Turns out I was grossly generalising, and they're
targeting around the end of the month.
Good to hear there is progress with upstream.
Personally I'd rather see a non-rc buggy version in testing before a
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 07:29:19PM +, peter green wrote:
Currently, the version of isc-dhcp-client in unstable suffers two rc
bugs, a FTBFS bug ( 643569 ) and a non-free IETF documents bug ( 645760
) both related to embedded bind source.
Furthermore isc-dhcp-client FTBFS in testing
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:22:27 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I have been working with upstream on addressing both of these issues, and I
am hopeful that the 4.2.4 release, which is due in the next couple of
months, to address these issues. I'm waiting to see how much better that
release
Hello,
I have been working with upstream on addressing both of these issues, and I
am hopeful that the 4.2.4 release, which is due in the next couple of
months, to address these issues. I'm waiting to see how much better that
release looks.
Speaking both as someone trying to get the armhf
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:22:27 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote:
I have been working with upstream on addressing both of these issues, and I
am hopeful that the 4.2.4 release, which is due in the next couple of
months, to
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 11:03:17PM +, peter green wrote:
Hello,
I have been working with upstream on addressing both of these issues, and I
am hopeful that the 4.2.4 release, which is due in the next couple of
months, to address these issues. I'm waiting to see how much better that
12 matches
Mail list logo
