Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:44:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I took a quick look at the current status:
[...]
> That leaves aspectj as the only blocker:
With the new aspectj in testing, this is no longer an issue. I added a removal
hint for
webkitgtk/2.4.11-4 eclipse/3.8.1-11
On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:34:55 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
> > I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
> > ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
> >
> > 1. src:bnd
> > You fixed that already.
> >
> > 2. bat
Markus Koschany:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [...]
>> I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
>> ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
>>
>> 1. src:bnd
>> You fixed that already.
>>
>> 2. batik -> maven -> guice -> libspring-java -> aspect
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:01:07 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:
[...]
> I tried to sort out what I could find as required for getting the
> ancient eclipse out of testing in [1]:
>
> 1. src:bnd
> You fixed that already.
>
> 2. batik -> maven -> guice -> libspring-java -> aspectj -> eclipse-platform
> Is t
Le 15/11/2017 à 17:56, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
> I suspect we build the aspectj eclipse plugin but don't even install it
> in the binary package. I'll see if this can be disabled.
Long story short, it can't. aspectj deeply depends on eclipse jdt. Also
upgrading to the latest version isn't possib
Le 15/11/2017 à 17:01, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> 2. batik -> maven -> guice -> libspring-java -> aspectj -> eclipse-platform
> Is there some good way to break this dependency chain?
I suspect we build the aspectj eclipse plugin but don't even install it
in the binary package. I'll see if this can b
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 12:08:10AM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>...
> We should definitely try to avoid this sort of dependency mess in the
> future by packaging important libraries like eclipse-rcp in a separate
> source package. That would be similar to what we are doing whith
> Netbeans and li
Am 09.11.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
[...]
> Have you considered dropping the libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni dependency
> from eclipse-rcp? Then the swt-gtk source package could stop building
> libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni and we could complete the webkitgtk removal
> from Debian Testing.
>
> Thanks,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 20.10.2017 um 18:43 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>>> Are there any objections to me requesting that the ftpmasters remove
>>> swt-gtk and eclipse from Debian Testing so that we can compl
Am 01.11.2017 um 22:04 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:23:32PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 01.11.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
> Never mind. I trie
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:23:32PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 01.11.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got mo
Am 01.11.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>>
>>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
>>> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
>>
>> Funny, I
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>
>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
>> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
>
> Funny, I never realized that src:eclipse was basically holdin
Le 21/10/2017 à 00:33, Markus Koschany a écrit :
> Please claim this bug or tell me when you start to work on something
> related to Eclipse or Tycho, so that we avoid double work.
For now I'm just working on swt4-gtk. I'll ping the list if I feel ready
for some tycho/eclipse action.
Am 21.10.2017 um 00:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
>
>> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
>> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
>
> Funny, I never realized that src:eclipse was basically holding most
Le 20/10/2017 à 23:52, Jeremy Bicha a écrit :
> Never mind. I tried doing the dak queries and I eventually got more
> than 500 reverse-depends before I gave up. (Attached)
Funny, I never realized that src:eclipse was basically holding most of
the Java packages. Maybe this package deserves some of
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 20.10.2017 um 18:43 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
>> Are there any objections to me requesting that the ftpmasters remove
>> swt-gtk and eclipse from Debian Testing so that we can complete the
>> webkitgtk removal from Testing?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
Control: severity -1 serious
I'm elevating this bug to RC then.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Hi,
Am 20.10.2017 um 18:43 schrieb Jeremy Bicha:
> I don't think Debian 10 "Buster" should include eclipse and swt-gtk if
> they haven't been upgraded past 3.8.
>
> I came across this bug report while trying to remove the unsecure
> webkitgtk from Debian. webkitgtk is ready for removal from Debia
I don't think Debian 10 "Buster" should include eclipse and swt-gtk if
they haven't been upgraded past 3.8.
I came across this bug report while trying to remove the unsecure
webkitgtk from Debian. webkitgtk is ready for removal from Debian
Testing in 3 days except…
libswt-webkit-gtk-3-jni has an
20 matches
Mail list logo