Bug#707573: Future of ko.tex* packages
Hi Norbert, On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 05:15:15PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi Ricardo, I just found your bug report and I have two proposals: * first, the ko.tex-extra-hlfont should be orphaned, too That's easy because it's already done ;) → http://bugs.debian.org/707574 * second, I suggest *removing* this package as it is not required by anyone, and since my last upload of src:texlive-lang 2013.20131112-1, and uptodate (2013) version of ko-tex is included in texlive-lang-cjk. I see two options: * simple removal and I add a conflicts in texlive-lang-cjk to that the package is removed * I build in a addition a transitional package ko.tex etc etc (3-4 packages) from texlive-lang-cjk to force transition. I am not sure what the QA Team wants. THere is the problem that ko-tex has changed significantly since 2007, and maybe maybe old documents cannot be set anymore. But having the version of 2007 in the archive does not help anyone. My personal preference is: removal of the k.tex* package and I just only add a conflict against ko.tex*. What do you think? I believe your personal preference is the right thing to do, given your summary. Filed the removal bug → http://bugs.debian.org/730016 best regards, -- Ricardo Mones, on behalf of Debian QA/MIA team http://people.debian.org/~mones «Never send a human to do a machine's job.» ~ Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#707573: Future of ko.tex* packages
Hi Ricardo, thanks a lot for all the fixes. Greatly appreciated. Especially since I don't have to do anything for now ;-) Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#707573: Future of ko.tex* packages
Hi all Interesting! That will be an advantage for latex-cjk-korean too. BR -- Danai On 20 November 2013 18:06, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote: Hi Ricardo, thanks a lot for all the fixes. Greatly appreciated. Especially since I don't have to do anything for now ;-) Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-tex-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131120100601.ge23...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at
Bug#707573: Future of ko.tex* packages
Hi Ricardo, I just found your bug report and I have two proposals: * first, the ko.tex-extra-hlfont should be orphaned, too * second, I suggest *removing* this package as it is not required by anyone, and since my last upload of src:texlive-lang 2013.20131112-1, and uptodate (2013) version of ko-tex is included in texlive-lang-cjk. I see two options: * simple removal and I add a conflicts in texlive-lang-cjk to that the package is removed * I build in a addition a transitional package ko.tex etc etc (3-4 packages) from texlive-lang-cjk to force transition. I am not sure what the QA Team wants. THere is the problem that ko-tex has changed significantly since 2007, and maybe maybe old documents cannot be set anymore. But having the version of 2007 in the archive does not help anyone. My personal preference is: removal of the k.tex* package and I just only add a conflict against ko.tex*. What do you think? All the best Norbert PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
