Hi Kevin,
I uploaded it. Please, consider migrating VCS on
alioth. Thanks for work.
Cheers,
Anton
2013/9/28 Kevin Bortis p...@bortis.ch:
I have packed the newest upstream version 0.9.14
It builds those binary packages:
musl - standard C library
musl-dev - standard C library
I have packed the newest upstream version 0.9.14
It builds those binary packages:
musl - standard C library
musl-dev - standard C library development files
musl-tools - standard C library tools
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
Hi
I have revorked the debian/copyright file according to the additional
comments given by Paul Richards Tagliamonte (FTP Master).
Work done:
* Incorporated all copyright info given from upstream in their copyright file
* grep over complete source tree for the term Copyright and
controlled
Ok, I uploaded it. Have done only minor change:
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 346bdf2..9e328e6 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
musl (0.9.13-3) unstable; urgency=low
- * Ready for Debian upload (Closes: #721839)
+ * Ready for
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I have updated the packages to adress the last lintian warning about
the missing manpage. Musl is a new standard C library, almost written
from scratch. It is small like uclibc, but is mostly glibc compatible.
For more information:
Hi Kevin,
thanks for working on the package. Generally it looks
good and almost ready for uploading. Some minor notes:
- Remove Readme.Debian, it is useless.
- Changelog should have just one note: Initial packaging, Closes
The package was not yet uploaded into Debian.
- The package number
Hi Anton
Thanks for your fast feedback. I have revorked the files according to
your comments. Answers are in the text. I have not uploaded a new
package to Debian mentors. But changes can be found under:
https://github.com/wermut/musl/tree/master/debian
If you have furter questions. I am ready
Hi Kevin,
Am Freitag, den 20.09.2013, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Kevin Bortis:
- Changelog should have just one note: Initial packaging, Closes
First debian/changelog entry closes ITP
Last debian/changelog closes RFS
OK like this?
No, RFS are not to be closed within the changelog. Your sponsor
Hi Kevin,
The package was not yet uploaded into Debian.
- The package number should be 0.9.13-1
Could I still keep the incrementation, because the earlier versions
are already tagged signed in the public git repository and also
already uploaded to a Ubuntu PPA? (ppa:bortis/musl) So
9 matches
Mail list logo
